Page 3 of 22 FirstFirst 12345613 ... LastLast
Results 51 to 75 of 540

Thread: Onepagebook, coolaler and Superpi

  1. #51
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1,835
    Quote Originally Posted by Gautam
    No one accused anyone of cheating. All that was called for was an explanation.

    Personally, I don't feel that anyone is above question. The deviation shown on the graphs is large enough that some questions certainly are warranted.
    Did I say you accused them of cheating?
    If so please show me where.
    Intel FTW!

    Beanna

  2. #52
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    4,764
    Quote Originally Posted by NiCKE^
    So this is actually a desperate attempt to either get coolaler and opb marked as cheaters or getting tweaks that you guys ain't aware of that they don't want to share with you?
    Do you really think they will share stuff with you when you do like this?

    So OPB's score isn't valid? Well the validation check says it's.

    So when someone is a better tweaker then avarage joe it has to be some bad stuff involved?
    OPB has been sharing tweaks and helped your members here at XS since he first came here. Now you treat him like he is a bad guy. Oh yeah XS staff we know you don't like OPB and OCX, but this smells like jealousy.
    I was wondering when the OCX v XS would raise it's head.

    The problem is that these tweaks, if they are tweaks, have been discovered only in Taiwan and yet the combined might of the rest of the world, including Japan, has not discovered them. Is that reasonable?

    If it is then they should say the secret like in 3dmark where Pedro and Ricky gave a clue to Macci and then the rest of the benching community benefitted Oh no, you cry, they do not have to give the secret away.

    VERY TRUE

    But then I say to you no matter how those benches were acheived they are not VALID to a lot of people here because they do not follow the mathematical statistics and therefore are bogus without explanation.

    End of story.

    Regards
    Andy
    Last edited by zakelwe; 12-13-2006 at 02:08 PM.

  3. #53
    SSD faster than your HDD
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Kalamazoo, MI
    Posts
    2,627
    Remember guys, this does not have to be about cheating.

    Do not take this as an accusation of cheating.....people are looking for explanation as to why and how, with sufficient evidence that the results were produced with publicly available materials along with the skills of the individual.

    That is my 2 cents.

  4. #54
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    4,764
    Quote Originally Posted by boblemagnifique
    That make just 1 year which one speaks that scores are impossible on be half of OPB, but good I passed for a idiot here, That give pleasure that some reflect a little instead of believing somebody who benefits from the scores has reasons professional .....

    http://www.biwa.ne.jp/~yok/28GP/28GP.htm

    Benchs and overlocker are a passion, one should not mixed work and the pleasure
    No longer an idiot. Thanks for posting

    Regards

    Andy

  5. #55
    Admin
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Hillsboro, OR
    Posts
    5,225
    Quote Originally Posted by tiborrr
    LOL, thats weird fellas, i ran E6600 aircooled @ 3951, reached time of 12.750s on P5B-dlx...

    3951*12.75 = 50375

    ... and i'm not a superpi expert. So does that make me a cheater? I think you should move your boundary of what very well tweaked is a bit lower. This was just apps-closed-down 24/7 system, nothing special about it.

    Guys, once again, the analysis only applies to scores well above 4 GHz. (The lowest included in this set of data was at 4251MHz)

    This was only done to show a wide amount of data points. Only high speeds are relevant here as we're talking about 5.5GHz+ speeds anyways.

  6. #56
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    2,741
    this is akin to a witch hunt, they float thery're witches, they drown they're not witches, fat chance of getting out of that kind of jury alive.

    regards
    Raja

  7. #57
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    East Coast USA
    Posts
    768
    Quote Originally Posted by Gautam
    No one accused anyone of cheating. All that was called for was an explanation.

    Personally, I don't feel that anyone is above question. The deviation shown on the graphs is large enough that some questions certainly are warranted.

    This is a piss poor way to go about asking for an explanation (aka whats your tweak). As I stated earlier, this should have and could have been handled in a more appropriate manor. I am very disappointed that this sort of questioning is aired in public. I expect more of this community.
    Last edited by cronic; 12-13-2006 at 02:05 PM.

  8. #58
    Admin
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Hillsboro, OR
    Posts
    5,225
    Quote Originally Posted by cronic
    This is a piss poor way to go about asking for an explanation. As I stated earlier, this should have and could have been handled in a more appropriate manor. I am very disappointed that this sort of questioning is aired in public. I expect more of this community.
    I don't see anything inappropriate about it. I see numbers and graphs clearly laid out.

    No one's on trial here either. Some data is laid out, some questions are being asked. Nothing more, nothing less.

  9. #59
    Aussie God
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Copenhagen, Denmark
    Posts
    4,596
    Quote Originally Posted by Gautam
    I don't see anything inappropriate about it. I see numbers and graphs clearly laid out.

    No one's on trial here either. Some data is laid out, some questions are being asked. Nothing more, nothing less.
    Now thats not true

    But except that, I really find that 2800mhz run VERY odd!
    Competition ranking;
    2005; Netbyte, Karise/Denmark #1 @ PiFast
    2008; AOCM II, Minfeld/Germany #2 @ 01SE/AM3/8M (w. Oliver)
    2009; AMD-OC, Viborg/Denmark #2 @ max freq Gigabyte TweaKING, Paris/France #4 @ 32M/01SE (w. Vanovich)
    2010: Gigabyte P55, Hamburg/Germany #6 @ wprime 1024/SPI 1M (w. THC) AOCM III, Minfeld/Germany #6 @ 01SE/AM3/1M/8M (w. NeoForce)

    Spectating;
    2010; GOOC 2010 Many thanks to Gigabyte!


  10. #60
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1,835
    Haha am I crying? Nope

    Come on Andy I know there's no secret that XS and OCX is like AMD and Intel

    You think Ferrari and Renault told eachother how they tweaked their cars to run better then others?
    Tweaks only discovered in Taiwan, from what I know Kevin lives in the states?
    Yeah both coolaler and opb is Taiwanese and can it maybe have something todo with that both know the tweak? Maybe they're friends and tell eachother tweaks and such in order to improve. Like when two guys are exchanging ideas to get a better result?
    Is it a written rule that Japan must be the best country when it comes to SuperPi?

    Well just because OPB and Coolaler got better scores then avarage joe gets doesn't mean they need to do something dirty.
    Maybe they just know how to tweak windows very well? Maybe they have the right services disabled?
    Most in the world can be calculated with math but there's some stuff that can't and maybe this is one of those things?
    We better make a call to Charlie from Numb3rs, he gotta know a thing or two don't you think so?
    Intel FTW!

    Beanna

  11. #61
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    North America
    Posts
    2,038
    Quote Originally Posted by zbogorgon
    it is suppose to be for freqs 4500+, not low freqs
    Yup so If OPB can beat a ratio got at 2.4-3.6G with his 1M WR... there is a problem no?

    I want a vid...
    I love XS

    Road to CompTIA A+ (601, 602) and Network+ (N10-003) Certifications

    I want a Penryn 3.33G 12MB & quad sli Nvidia G92

  12. #62
    Slovenian OC Master
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Slovenia
    Posts
    1,089
    Quote Originally Posted by NiCKE^
    Haha am I crying? Nope

    Come on Andy I know there's no secret that XS and OCX is like AMD and Intel

    You think Ferrari and Renault told eachother how they tweaked their cars to run better then others?
    Tweaks only discovered in Taiwan, from what I know Kevin lives in the states?
    Yeah both coolaler and opb is Taiwanese and can it maybe have something todo with that both know the tweak? Maybe they're friends and tell eachother tweaks and such in order to improve. Like when two guys are exchanging ideas to get a better result?
    Is it a written rule that Japan must be the best country when it comes to SuperPi?

    Well just because OPB and Coolaler got better scores then avarage joe gets doesn't mean they need to do something dirty.
    Maybe they just know how to tweak windows very well? Maybe they have the right services disabled?
    Most in the world can be calculated with math but there's some stuff that can't and maybe this is one of those things?
    We better make a call to Charlie from Numb3rs, he gotta know a thing or two don't you think so?
    You so one-sided at your statements, that it is just silly, If you don't have any arguments about this matter, I suggest you to just don't say anythig
    1. You didn't even try to read the 1. post
    2. You clearly have no experience in Spi benchig with 5GHz C2Ds
    3. ~0.2s in 9s run is not little beter, it is H U G E
    OC-Lab.si!!

  13. #63
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    France
    Posts
    1,368
    Quote Originally Posted by zakelwe
    No longer an idiot. Thanks for posting

    Regards

    Andy


    Sorry for my English

    04/01/2006

    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...t=85069&page=3

    17/10/2006

    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=147
    Last edited by boblemagnifique; 12-13-2006 at 02:15 PM.
    OCM Member / IXTREMTEK Admin !!



    DDR1 2*256 BH5 Adata @324.7Mhz 1.5/2/2/5 1T at 4v @318.6Mhz Benchs
    DDR2 1*512 Kingston Pc8500 @702Mhz 5/5/5/18 at 2.42v réel
    DDR2 2*1024 Cell Shock Pc8000c4 @534Mhz 3/3/3/8 at 3.5v réel

    Cooling : XP90C , Big Typhoon , waterchiller R507 , LN2 ....

  14. #64
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    2,741
    there are a few tweaks that we don't all know about, they ain't gonna be made public in threads like this that's for sure.

    That's all I can say...

    regards
    Raja

  15. #65
    Slovenian OC Master
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Slovenia
    Posts
    1,089
    Quote Originally Posted by cpulloverclock
    Yup so If OPB can beat a ratio got at 2.4-3.6G with his 1M WR... there is a problem no?

    I want a vid...
    as it was stated, spi times with freqs doesnt scale linearly, when in 3GHz range, below 50000 is not a problem, in 4.5GHz it's really hard in 5.5GHz it is imposible, just read the 1st topic please
    OC-Lab.si!!

  16. #66
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1,835
    Quote Originally Posted by zbogorgon
    You so one-sided at your statements, that it is just silly, If you don't have any arguments about this matter, I suggest you to just don't say anythig
    1. You didn't even try to read the 1. post
    2. You clearly have no experience in Spi benchig with 5GHz C2Ds
    3. ~0.2s in 9s run is not little beter, it is H U G E
    First I read the post, then I responded, then I answered on Andy's quote.
    I write from my POV and what I think.
    Intel FTW!

    Beanna

  17. #67
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    122
    Wow interesting, if OPB/etc can proove it again, with the tweaks then its all good.


    But those stats are VERY VERY interesting.


    Come on OPB show us...

  18. #68
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    4,764
    Quote Originally Posted by cronic
    I am very disappointed that this sort of questioning is aired in public.
    How do you air something if it is not in public? Or do you just feel uncomfortable with the findings ?

    This has been aired on the moderators forum for a while here. I am not an expert in 2d benching but I have had a lot of experience of 3d benching and we have been lucky for a lot of years in that we have had experienced benchers who have been able to do human policing of the results as well as futuremark. People like macci, Oppainter etc.

    Here you seem to be lacking this. No questioning at all and when it is finally brought out into the open with graphs you stick your head in the sand and don't want the status quo to be questioned it seems.

    All we want is a possible explanation to why those results are better than average that we can think about. Nobody yet has given an answer that is reasonable or is worth chewing over.

    Regards

    Andy

  19. #69
    Slovenian OC Master
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Slovenia
    Posts
    1,089
    Quote Originally Posted by NiCKE^
    First I read the post, then I responded, then I answered on Andy's quote.
    I write from my POV and what I think.
    the only thing you said repetedly in direct meaning: "OPB is not a liar, he is the best superpi bencher, he has the ultimate tweak, you are all idiots"

    with no argument what so ever
    OC-Lab.si!!

  20. #70
    X.I.P
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    1,964
    before - 5000 x 10.06 = 50300 Lookie here...look at that RAM speed!

    btw.... check his FSB...... not good!

    if he used 400*12 boot then pull up, i think his score will break 49999

  21. #71
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Bedford, England
    Posts
    317
    Speaking from a totally impartial point of view, I don't really know OPB or have a special loyalty to XS...

    I can completely understand why some people would find the sudden decrease in SPi times to be a little suspect, but as has been debated time and again it is possible to fake pretty much anything... So, all we can rely on to give any kind of authenticity is reputation and integrity and personal run-ins aside as far as I've been able to tell OPB has always been straight up in that regard.

    My suspicion is that they have a new tweak and to force them to reveal it would be unfair to them. If they've put the work in to find a tweak then fair play to them, let them have their glory for now and when the time is right they'll let everyone else in on the secret as they always have in the past.
    Q6600 G0 L720B058 @ 3.8GHz | Asus Maximus Formula (Rampage 0403 Modded) | 4x2Gb GSkill PC8000 PQ @ 1015MHz | XFX 9800GX2 XXX @ 680/2080 | 2 x WD Raptors RAID0 | 1 x WD5000KS | Samsung S203B DVDR/W | Samsung SM245B + Panasonic TX37LZD80
    D-Tek Fuzion | PA120.3 + Shroud + Nexus Fans | MCW30 | Laing DDC w/ Petra's DDCT-01s Top Combo | Tygon 1/2" Tubing | T-Line

  22. #72
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    4,764
    Quote Originally Posted by NiCKE^
    Haha am I crying? Nope

    Come on Andy I know there's no secret that XS and OCX is like AMD and Intel

    You think Ferrari and Renault told eachother how they tweaked their cars to run better then others?
    Tweaks only discovered in Taiwan, from what I know Kevin lives in the states?
    Yeah both coolaler and opb is Taiwanese and can it maybe have something todo with that both know the tweak? Maybe they're friends and tell eachother tweaks and such in order to improve. Like when two guys are exchanging ideas to get a better result?
    Is it a written rule that Japan must be the best country when it comes to SuperPi?

    Well just because OPB and Coolaler got better scores then avarage joe gets doesn't mean they need to do something dirty.
    Maybe they just know how to tweak windows very well? Maybe they have the right services disabled?
    Most in the world can be calculated with math but there's some stuff that can't and maybe this is one of those things?
    We better make a call to Charlie from Numb3rs, he gotta know a thing or two don't you think so?
    DO YOU THINK THE GRAPHS RESULTS ARE WORTH TRYING TO INVESTIGATE OR NOT ?

    Yes or no ?

    Regards

    Andy

  23. #73
    Bulletproof
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Shun low, K?
    Posts
    2,553
    Quote Originally Posted by raju
    there are a few tweaks that we don't all know about, they ain't gonna be made public in threads like this that's for sure.

    That's all I can say...

    regards
    Raja

    I have secret tweaks that provide massive boosts in an aspect of processor performance that is highly unaffected by tweaks. But you can't see them. Spoooooooooooooky.

    http://thegeekzine.com/images/featur...man_encirc.gif

    Could it be?

    Inquiring minds want to know.
    Only the stupidest humans believe that the dogma of relative filth is a defense.

  24. #74
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1,835
    Quote Originally Posted by zbogorgon
    the only thing you said repetedly in direct meaning: "OPB is not a liar, he is the best superpi bencher, he has the ultimate tweak, you are all idiots"

    with no argument what so ever
    What I tried to say is that OPB is a good superpi bencher, he uses most likely the best tweaks, people want to know but he don't want to share, people try to get the tweak from him by not directly calling him a cheater but making the community reacting like "If you don't tell us you're a cheater".

    I don't think everyone are idiots since I've not meet a single guy from here, juding by internet behaviour ain't fair really.

    This thread just confirms that coolaler and opb is superior when it comes to superpi. As it's stated by moderators, they don't blame them for cheating they just says it's something that makes them better then others.
    Intel FTW!

    Beanna

  25. #75
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    East Coast USA
    Posts
    768
    Quote Originally Posted by zakelwe
    How do you air something if it is not in public? Or do you just feel uncomfortable with the findings ?

    This has been aired on the moderators forum for a while here. I am not an expert in 2d benching but I have had a lot of experience of 3d benching and we have been lucky for a lot of years in that we have had experienced benchers who have been able to do human policing of the results as well as futuremark. People like macci, Oppainter etc.

    Here you seem to be lacking this. No questioning at all and when it is finally brought out into the open with graphs you stick your head in the sand and don't want the status quo to be questioned it seems.

    All we want is a possible explanation to why those results are better than average that we can think about. Nobody yet has given an answer that is reasonable or is worth chewing over.

    Regards

    Andy

    Did anyone contact these people and ask the question why are your scores so good before posting this thread? If so what was the response? Just because someone put info into a graph or chart does not make it fact. And if there responses are, we are better than you at tweaking do you label them cheaters, as you have clearly already stated that there results are not legit in the original post. My problem is the way this questioning is being handled, period.
    Last edited by cronic; 12-13-2006 at 02:27 PM.

Page 3 of 22 FirstFirst 12345613 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •