it is suppose to be for freqs 4500+, not low freqs
it is suppose to be for freqs 4500+, not low freqs
OC-Lab.si!!
Remember guys, this does not have to be about cheating.
Do not take this as an accusation of cheating.....people are looking for explanation as to why and how, with sufficient evidence that the results were produced with publicly available materials along with the skills of the individual.
That is my 2 cents.
Yup so If OPB can beat a ratio got at 2.4-3.6G with his 1M WR... there is a problem no?Originally Posted by zbogorgon
I want a vid...
I love XS
![]()
Road to CompTIA A+ (601, 602) and Network+ (N10-003) Certifications
I want a Penryn 3.33G 12MB & quad sli Nvidia G92
as it was stated, spi times with freqs doesnt scale linearly, when in 3GHz range, below 50000 is not a problem, in 4.5GHz it's really hard in 5.5GHz it is imposible, just read the 1st topic pleaseOriginally Posted by cpulloverclock
OC-Lab.si!!
so u confirm what I say, sayin thatOriginally Posted by zbogorgon
I love XS
![]()
Road to CompTIA A+ (601, 602) and Network+ (N10-003) Certifications
I want a Penryn 3.33G 12MB & quad sli Nvidia G92
heh, so sorry, I misunderstood your postOriginally Posted by cpulloverclock
![]()
OC-Lab.si!!
This happens because the Ram speed in MHz remains tha same (ex. 460MHz rams at 3600MHz cpu and AGAIN 460MHz rams at 5500MHz cpu)...It's impossible to be the same.....Originally Posted by zbogorgon
When our CPU goes up, ram frequencies on the other hand can't go any higher so we ONLY gain from CPU's frequency/bandwidth/latency at higher frequencies....
IF we could upper ram's frequency with Cpu's frequency TOGETHER, the scores and the linearity whould be almost the same as of the lower frequencies.......By this I mean we whould have had a 25000 bandwidth and below 25ns Latency.....![]()
ONE question though.......The guys - in general - with the good times in Super-Pi and High frequencies (above 5GHz), at what frequencies they had run 3D benchmarks?......DON'T tell me that they benched Super-Pi at 5400MHz and 3D at 5000MHz coz there is NO way.....A guy that Super-Pi's at 5400MHz, IS CAPABLE of 3D at 5300MHz AT LEAST not to say more.....![]()
INTEL PWA FOR EVER
Dr. Who my arss...![]()
.........
When you say 3D stable you mean 2001SE single tests or a full run of 2005 or 2006 or so?Originally Posted by hipro5
Me and ojdr2001 with our old CPU that did Pi 1M at 5132Mhzs were having a hard time running 3D mark above 4950Mhzs, our new CPU does Pi 1M at 5400Mhzs but still no 3D tests.
Btw this thread is worthless without OPB and/or coolaler posting. I know you guys got good arguments but we need to give them a chance to explain their results and I don't doubt or believe them but as someone said before they could have found a tweak like RickY found the multiprocessor sometime ago, anyway if there's a tweak like that I need it :P Can't get lower than 9.44seconds at 5385Mhzs :S
PS - Don't mix OCX and XS fight in this thread please, nothing to do with this topic (and it's a kinda stupid fight....)
Bookmarks