Results 1 to 25 of 540

Thread: Onepagebook, coolaler and Superpi

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Slovenian OC Master
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Slovenia
    Posts
    1,089
    it is suppose to be for freqs 4500+, not low freqs
    OC-Lab.si!!

  2. #2
    SSD faster than your HDD
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Kalamazoo, MI
    Posts
    2,627
    Remember guys, this does not have to be about cheating.

    Do not take this as an accusation of cheating.....people are looking for explanation as to why and how, with sufficient evidence that the results were produced with publicly available materials along with the skills of the individual.

    That is my 2 cents.

  3. #3
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    North America
    Posts
    2,038
    Quote Originally Posted by zbogorgon
    it is suppose to be for freqs 4500+, not low freqs
    Yup so If OPB can beat a ratio got at 2.4-3.6G with his 1M WR... there is a problem no?

    I want a vid...
    I love XS

    Road to CompTIA A+ (601, 602) and Network+ (N10-003) Certifications

    I want a Penryn 3.33G 12MB & quad sli Nvidia G92

  4. #4
    Slovenian OC Master
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Slovenia
    Posts
    1,089
    Quote Originally Posted by cpulloverclock
    Yup so If OPB can beat a ratio got at 2.4-3.6G with his 1M WR... there is a problem no?

    I want a vid...
    as it was stated, spi times with freqs doesnt scale linearly, when in 3GHz range, below 50000 is not a problem, in 4.5GHz it's really hard in 5.5GHz it is imposible, just read the 1st topic please
    OC-Lab.si!!

  5. #5
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    North America
    Posts
    2,038
    Quote Originally Posted by zbogorgon
    as it was stated, spi times with freqs doesnt scale linearly, when in 3GHz range, below 50000 is not a problem, in 4.5GHz it's really hard in 5.5GHz it is imposible, just read the 1st topic please
    so u confirm what I say, sayin that
    I love XS

    Road to CompTIA A+ (601, 602) and Network+ (N10-003) Certifications

    I want a Penryn 3.33G 12MB & quad sli Nvidia G92

  6. #6
    Slovenian OC Master
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Slovenia
    Posts
    1,089
    Quote Originally Posted by cpulloverclock
    so u confirm what I say, sayin that
    heh, so sorry, I misunderstood your post
    OC-Lab.si!!

  7. #7
    k|ngp|n/Sham my brothers
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Athens---Hellas
    Posts
    5,693
    Quote Originally Posted by zbogorgon
    as it was stated, spi times with freqs doesnt scale linearly, when in 3GHz range, below 50000 is not a problem, in 4.5GHz it's really hard in 5.5GHz it is imposible, just read the 1st topic please
    This happens because the Ram speed in MHz remains tha same (ex. 460MHz rams at 3600MHz cpu and AGAIN 460MHz rams at 5500MHz cpu)...It's impossible to be the same.....
    When our CPU goes up, ram frequencies on the other hand can't go any higher so we ONLY gain from CPU's frequency/bandwidth/latency at higher frequencies....
    IF we could upper ram's frequency with Cpu's frequency TOGETHER, the scores and the linearity whould be almost the same as of the lower frequencies.......By this I mean we whould have had a 25000 bandwidth and below 25ns Latency.....


    ONE question though.......The guys - in general - with the good times in Super-Pi and High frequencies (above 5GHz), at what frequencies they had run 3D benchmarks?......DON'T tell me that they benched Super-Pi at 5400MHz and 3D at 5000MHz coz there is NO way.....A guy that Super-Pi's at 5400MHz, IS CAPABLE of 3D at 5300MHz AT LEAST not to say more.....
    INTEL PWA FOR EVER

    Dr. Who my arss...

    .........



  8. #8
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    265
    Quote Originally Posted by hipro5
    This happens because the Ram speed in MHz remains tha same (ex. 460MHz rams at 3600MHz cpu and AGAIN 460MHz rams at 5500MHz cpu)...It's impossible to be the same.....
    When our CPU goes up, ram frequencies on the other hand can't go any higher so we ONLY gain from CPU's frequency/bandwidth/latency at higher frequencies....
    IF we could upper ram's frequency with Cpu's frequency TOGETHER, the scores and the linearity whould be almost the same as of the lower frequencies.......By this I mean we whould have had a 25000 bandwidth and below 25ns Latency.....


    ONE question though.......The guys - in general - with the good times in Super-Pi and High frequencies (above 5GHz), at what frequencies they had run 3D benchmarks?......DON'T tell me that they benched Super-Pi at 5400MHz and 3D at 5000MHz coz there is NO way.....A guy that Super-Pi's at 5400MHz, IS CAPABLE of 3D at 5300MHz AT LEAST not to say more.....
    When you say 3D stable you mean 2001SE single tests or a full run of 2005 or 2006 or so?
    Me and ojdr2001 with our old CPU that did Pi 1M at 5132Mhzs were having a hard time running 3D mark above 4950Mhzs, our new CPU does Pi 1M at 5400Mhzs but still no 3D tests.

    Btw this thread is worthless without OPB and/or coolaler posting. I know you guys got good arguments but we need to give them a chance to explain their results and I don't doubt or believe them but as someone said before they could have found a tweak like RickY found the multiprocessor sometime ago, anyway if there's a tweak like that I need it :P Can't get lower than 9.44seconds at 5385Mhzs :S

    PS - Don't mix OCX and XS fight in this thread please, nothing to do with this topic (and it's a kinda stupid fight....)
    Last edited by [_Silence_]; 12-14-2006 at 03:08 AM.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •