Onepagebook, coolaler and Superpi

[massman]

in light of TaPaKaH's recent admittance of faking everything

Where does he say that, in his own words ?

If it's indeed all fake, hwbot will take further actions and delete his scores.

[RyderOCZ]

Where does he say that, in his own words ?

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=126554

[massman]

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=126554

His results are blocked at hwbot, I'm waiting on Rich' call for further actions.

[zbogorgon]

Where does he say that, in his own words ?

If it's indeed all fake, hwbot will take further actions and delete his scores.

probably over PM, he is Banned on XS

[cadaveca]

Where does he say that, in his own words ?

If it's indeed all fake, hwbot will take further actions and delete his scores.

here ya go:

Can you please ban me?

Reasons:
I`m a big faker
none of my results are true
I have never used any of xtreme cooling (DI/LN2)
sitting @ my PII-233 box
I hate XS
the member they talk about here http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...=117280&page=3 is me

ATM I report that` I`m not mad at someone, not drunk, wasn`t hit on the street by the brick

That`s just my will.
I do not want to be an XS member anymore...

Thanks
Sam

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&highlight=ban



BTW...TaPaKaH = HaKa PaT = Hacker Pat.

[zbogorgon]

the only thing i can think about explaining OPB run is the systems stability at that point.

I think everyone can produce the same output ,

bench at max cpu speed, let it error, bench again little less, bench again at max cpu speed, again less.

There should be noticable changes no ?

the only thing i came accross is you Spi time is way longer, i had at ~4000GHz C2D spi 1m ~22s, never noticed insanelly fast time due to instability

[Jort]

that's what i mean, the point where instability somehow is stable..

Who else hasn't got the same experience,

you got run 2970mhz superpi al day long, 3GHZ would error, but after idling and pushing it again somehow it manages to work just that once, and give you that little nice extra. i have multiple times on A64...

juts brainstorming eh before you guys ramp me over lol :p

Yes i had this couple times on A64 too.

Never could get the same time again on the same settings, so is that score invalid? or cheating? No

[SLi_dog]

This is a piss poor way to go about asking for an explanation (aka whats your tweak). As I stated earlier, this should have and could have been handled in a more appropriate manor. I am very disappointed that this sort of questioning is aired in public. I expect more of this community.

I tend to agree with cronic here. Though it may not have been the intention of the original post to call OPB and Coolaler cheats, it could be interperated that way, particularly if english is not your primary language
In particular, this line cannot be taken any other way, no matter what language you speak.

Anyway, something's up with the orange and red results....they're just not legit.

The thread title itself seemingly sets the tone that something not-qute-right has been discovered.

Again, whether it was the intention or not, the thread has seemingly continued to take on this tone.

the only answer now is a statistical reply that can be replicated and shown to be true.

In other words, prove it or you're a cheat.

I think they feel disrespected this way. Especially when I know for a fact that the results are genuine, that's all I can say. Respect to OPB.

well it's just been done..

But I guess I'm not trusted enough here?

This is a very bold statement raju. I respect you and OPB but can you please post some scores to add to this claim

also , there's not anything about tweaks , if you notice the CPUZ WR is OPB's 5700Mhz , unless anyone says this is not legit too..... , that chip is capable of run the 5500 1M at very comfortable way , with more room to do it , he got worst time with more Mhz , so what can be deduced here? pretty simple , the CPU performs better in his best spot of the highest frecuency and stability , also , the less vcore the best performance at the same speed


the rest of the 5500+ scores , as i see it probably those CPUs are not stable enough and maybe affecting raw performance

Though definately an amazing accomplishment Predator, which involved killing numerous motherboards in the attemp, iirc OPB had to disable one core to get to 5.7Ghz so stability would indeed seem to be a factor in this debate.

that's what i mean, the point where instability somehow is stable..

Who else hasn't got the same experience,

I've got a 38sec 8M time due to an error on the 680i. SuperPi errored out on the 4th loop and just repeated the 38sec for the remaining loops. It gave a checksum value but no screen capture was possible because the system had psuedo-crashed.



I'm not sure what should happen with these scores. Indeed it would be good to see them replicated and their accuracy verified but it seems that more and more, Xtremesystems is becoming a place of XtremeEgos that often clash together and take away from what I see as a possitive online community.


Just my 2 cents

[mrlobber]

BTW...TaPaKaH = HaKa PaT = Hacker Pat.

Just to point out, TaPaKaH = Tarakan (if Russian letters are converted to Latin alphabet), and Tarakan in Russian means (C)ockroach in English.

[Raja@ASUS]

this thread has no concrete proof. I can say that OPB is one of the most honest people I know and does not hide his settings or tweaks from anyone...

In fact he'd prolly invite you round to his place to repeat those scores...

Bad thread, should be deleted..

sorry to see this sort of stuff here, what a shame.

[zakelwe]

this thread has no concrete proof. I can say that OPB is one of the most honest people I know and does not hide his settings or tweaks from anyone...

In fact he'd prolly invite you round to his place to repeat those scores...

Bad thread, should be deleted..

sorry to see this sort of stuff here, what a shame.

No concrete proof ? Sorry, there are some graphs on the first page that took a lot of time and effort that show an abnomality.

Regards

Andy