brisbane dual core 65nm

**~~DoubleZero~~** · 12-06-2006, 12:42 PM

Originally Posted by savantu

This is good enough for you ?

Looks like gossip wins this time ...

Wow... didn't know K8l was only going to be opterons.
Gossip wins? lol it's not even gossip, every other people know k8l will work on am2, so i fail to see where it wins.

**The Ghost** · 12-06-2006, 01:06 PM

Originally Posted by savantu

This is good enough for you ?

http://img64.imageshack.us/img64/115...uadcorexb6.jpg

Looks like gossip wins this time ...

and where does it say that it will not work in a am2 socket ?

**doompc** · 12-06-2006, 01:56 PM

And these CPUs already have support for DDR3 memory, they will work on AM3 boards.

**savantu** · 12-06-2006, 02:38 PM

We'll wait and see.

***Deimos*** · 12-07-2006, 08:35 PM

Originally Posted by Rickster_64

All I can say is if they are not hitting decently over 3ghz why switch. I mean, AMD had FX-55's on 130nm getting upto 3ghz back in what, 2003? Sure its single core, but really why get excited over that? The progression of hardware has all but stopped on the AMD side for now, so I would rather put my cash towards a DX10 card and leave my other stuff alone.

true .. true

Its been like how many years now since launch of dual-core?
Performance improvement in games from dual cores (to date) = virtually non-existant.

and then, reallity sinks in:
Overall benefit for average consumer to upgrade from existing P4/AthlonXP rig = nowhere to be found.

Now, I realize this is xtremesystems, and die-hard overlockers live here. But, vast majority of folks out there in the wild dont fold, or even know what it means. Look at top game sales and you see Sims, Lego Starwars and WOW right up there. Do you really need a 4Ghz LN2 C2D for that? Consiering many many of these poor lil people are running integrated graphics, and (also) have less than 512MB RAM, CPU horsepower is probably pretty low on the list of "whats wrong".
Yet, they still come in droves to buy newer versions of Windows, an newer versions of Office, and get new shiny PC with faster CPU, hopping that THIS time, it wont take minutes for all icons to load in system tray, or that somehow that horrible grinding sound accompanying applications loading, will go away. Sorry folks, but 90% + of your problems are plain simple system maintanace, and use of newer and more bloated then ever software.

Anybody try Win98 and Office97 on Core2Duo yet? I bet it takes <15sec to boot, and <2sec to start Word.

**halo112358** · 12-08-2006, 01:38 AM

Originally Posted by ***Deimos***

and then, reallity sinks in:
Overall benefit for average consumer to upgrade from existing P4/AthlonXP rig = nowhere to be found.

When a scheduled task kicks in it doesn't disrupt video playback or 3d gameplay, that's good enough for me

**Rickster_64** · 12-08-2006, 06:58 AM

So other than a screenshot of one, does anyone even HAVE one of these chips in hand? Seems pretty weak that no one in this entire forum has one yet. AMD must really ber slacking with them.

**MAS** · 12-08-2006, 10:33 AM

Originally Posted by Rickster_64

does anyone even HAVE one of these chips in hand?

maybe, but he's not in hurry to post his OC results
it's a fake

**vcas5** · 12-08-2006, 11:12 AM

3.5 ghz@ stock volts is good enough for me lol

**cky2k6** · 12-08-2006, 11:35 AM

Originally Posted by MAS

maybe, but he's not in hurry to post his OC results

if this is for real, holy

**Rickster_64** · 12-08-2006, 11:52 AM

Dude!!!!!!!!! Hopefully it's on water or a tuniq. Not phase. I woudl think that if yields where that good for air or close, AMD would be singing to the high heavens about it. We will see ;-) promising though!

**Aerou** · 12-08-2006, 02:22 PM

I agree it loooks sweat,
but I dont wanna get all excited and then be cry all the way ...
Im waiting for a full POST - pics, screenies and stuff, cuz the cpu-z voltage reading maybe bugged ... Who knows?

**biohead** · 12-08-2006, 02:34 PM

well I know someone who did 3.8 with a 5000+ 65nm piece on air. just boot stable probably, but would make that ^^ screenshot believable.

**~~Serge84~~** · 12-08-2006, 02:38 PM

Originally Posted by MAS

maybe, but he's not in hurry to post his OC results

Validation? Lets get some. >_>?

**Lightman** · 12-08-2006, 03:19 PM

When this happened??

I'm searching forums looking for something like this and suddenly

!
@MAS where did you found this pic??
@biohead do you have more details about this Brisbane?? ES sample or commercial one??

OK! Now it's time for

**freeloader** · 12-08-2006, 03:52 PM

Here's the article...

http://www.chilehardware.com/articulo_1686.html

Here's the forum thread for you to follow for those interested...

http://www.chilehardware.com/foro/co...md-t50333.html

Use you favourite online translation service (Spanish to whatever...)
to read it.

**Aerou** · 12-08-2006, 04:38 PM

I'm all shaking ... I want them @ retailers !

If 4GHz is doable, then AVE AMD !

**mzs_biteme** · 12-08-2006, 04:46 PM

Hardly a reason to celebrate....
Neither link (above) has anything to do with "their" review of Brisbane CPU...
Just their take on AMD's 65nm tech. Even if they had the CPU in question, they would provide far more details about it. Maybe actuall pics...

It's not like there is NDA on it as AMD's official release date was Dec 5th.
I say Vaporware....

**Lightman** · 12-08-2006, 04:56 PM

Originally Posted by MAS

maybe, but he's not in hurry to post his OC results

MAS why are you posting fake screen shot??

**~~terrace215~~** · 12-08-2006, 05:25 PM

Originally Posted by Lightman

MAS why are you posting fake screen shot??

He's AMD's biggest fanboy!

**nn_step** · 12-08-2006, 05:30 PM

Am2 4Ghz

**Asazman** · 12-08-2006, 06:13 PM

can't wait

**frankR** · 12-08-2006, 06:51 PM

I'm all for seeing a Brisbane running 3.5+ Ghz w/stock volts on air.

If it was availible for 939, I'd be even happier.

**~~Turtle 1~~** · 12-08-2006, 07:14 PM

Ed is uasually pretty right on here's what he has to say.

http://www.overclockers.com/tips01073/

Ed had a few other things to rant about.

http://www.overclockers.com/tips01074/

You must admit Ed has a few very good points.

**metro.cl** · 12-08-2006, 07:20 PM

those SS are fake i didnt post them, i only posted stock clocks stock volts

Thread: brisbane dual core 65nm

Thread Tools

Search Thread

Display

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions