Thanks for that post.Originally Posted by Gautam
I would certainly put more stock in your first hand experience than in that review so for future reference I'm going to bookmark your post...you are now officially a reference source.
Your theory on why the newer revisions of the 5400ULs were inferior makes sense and if I was producing the two models I would be binning accordingly. They were probably binned the same way TCCD was...some chips were better suited for running DDR400 at 2-2-2-5 and some were better suited for running DDR600, but at more relaxed timings. The later 5400s were probably selected because they could run the tighter timings at the lower clocks and the 8000ULs could do the higher clocks, but with more relaxed timings.
Bookmarks