With a parallelizable program so CPU-dependent, I bet he's really looking forward to affordable quad-core.
You must've loved working on that project and seeing it further developed on all the platforms as the hardware just gets better and cheaper.
With a parallelizable program so CPU-dependent, I bet he's really looking forward to affordable quad-core.
You must've loved working on that project and seeing it further developed on all the platforms as the hardware just gets better and cheaper.
Something like:
might be rewritten by a smart compiler into:Code:for (i = 0; i < 10000; i++) a[i] = b[i] * c[i];
broken into two simultaneous threads. Kewl, eh?Code:for (i = 5000; i < 10000; i++) a[i] = b[i] * c[i]; for (iprime = 0; iprime < 5000; iprime++) a[iprime] = b[iprime] * c[iprime];
http://www.pgroup.com/
http://www.pathscale.com/
But bring lotsa $$$, esp. for a sitewide license.
This is the reason I went and got this thread guys go with it and lets talk about it as Enthusiast
I believe this guy was right.He just missed by a couple of Generatons'
Lets everyone on this subject forget about Intel Vs. AMD .
This belongs in this thread . If you read up on Elbrus tech . You will understand the implacations of whats this is all about in relationship to the thread title.
http://techknowledger.blogspot.com/2...r_archive.html![]()
Bookmarks