Intel Conroe-L CPU-Z Scanshow

[sxs112]

[zakelwe]

Nice, how does it overclock ?

Regards

Andy

[Rovtar]

hmm this will be one-core processor? with 1 mb of L2?

[Stuperman]

I believe so, yes.

[kemo]

That thing will at least pull up to 4 GHz on air with any low end p965 mobo
I like the idea of low bus and high multi
________
Focus WRC

[TaPaKaH]

any benches ?
validation ?

[nn_step]

Basically a defective Conroe

[sxs112]

hmm this will be one-core processor? with 1 mb of L2?

Conroe-L is Single-Core with 1MB L2 support Enhanced Memory 64 Technology(EM64T)and Execute Disable Bit(XD)

non support Virtualization(VT), HyperThreading(HT) and Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology(EIST)

[Mr. Popo]

Basically a defective Conroe

Basically, a really cheap CPU.

[mr_knowitall15]

basically, the celly D of core cpus. I bet these suckers will see 4 on air EASY!!! they might make a fun cheapy to run DICE or LN2 on, and annialate super pi.

[DTU_XaVier]

IMHO, they're a huge step back in technology, just like the Cellys have always been... There is only one single advantage for these chips compared to "genuine" Conroes.. The high multi... For me, everything else speaks against it.. Singlecore, low cache, low FSB-speed, and the fact that they're released half a year after their far supirior bigger brothers... Sure, they might be fun to play with, but for anybody who's serious about the performance of his/her system, they're a no-go...

Best Regards

[lowfat]

That thing will at least pull up to 4 GHz on air with any low end p965 mobo
I like the idea of low bus and high multi

I agree, i with there would be dual core's like this.

[Anonymous]

IMHO, they're a huge step back in technology, just like the Cellys have always been... There is only one single advantage for these chips compared to "genuine" Conroes.. The high multi... For me, everything else speaks against it.. Singlecore, low cache, low FSB-speed, and the fact that they're released half a year after their far supirior bigger brothers... Sure, they might be fun to play with, but for anybody who's serious about the performance of his/her system, they're a no-go...

Best Regards

Why? Out of N# of CPUs manufactured (this goes with anything that is mass produced) you are going to have a percentage that will have defects esp with multi core processors. You really expect them to throw away those CPUs still have a working core? This is the same concept behind Kentsfield, instead of producing native quadcores on a 65nm when 45nm is right around the corner why not glue 2 processors together to save costs? The possiblity for a wafer of 4 core chips to have a defect is greater hence why a smaller process will save money since you are able to harvest more non-defective dies.

This is exactly the problem with the Cell CPU yeilds. It has a huge die size on a 90nm process and any defect has a high probality of rendering a cpu with bad cores or lower clockspeeds.

[vitaminc]

Basically a defective Conroe

That would be Allendale.

[fhpchris]

These will be nice to see, there are alot of people who want core 2 duo cheaply, but do not need two cores.

This should be a nice option untill the other 200fsb dual core C2D stuff is out.

[DTU_XaVier]

Why? Out of N# of CPUs manufactured (this goes with anything that is mass produced) you are going to have a percentage that will have defects esp with multi core processors. You really expect them to throw away those CPUs still have a working core? This is the same concept behind Kentsfield, instead of producing native quadcores on a 65nm when 45nm is right around the corner why not glue 2 processors together to save costs? The possiblity for a wafer of 4 core chips to have a defect is greater hence why a smaller process will save money since you are able to harvest more non-defective dies.

This is exactly the problem with the Cell CPU yeilds. It has a huge die size on a 90nm process and any defect has a high probality of rendering a cpu with bad cores or lower clockspeeds.

I'm not saying it's not a good thing, by all means, the less waste, the better ... I just do not understand peoples' enthusiasm about such an inferior (compared to today's mid-highend hardware) product... And are you going to tell me that office-computers will need the power of 1/4 Conroe??

Best Regards

[nn_step]

That would be Allendale.

Fine, defective Allendales

[One_Hertz]

Fine, defective Allendales

or a super defective conroe

[red]

I prefer the term disabled

[nn_step]

don't talk about nn that way. it's not his fault.

says the boy wearing the Neon Pink helmet

[DTU_XaVier]

I prefer the term disabled

These are inanimate, mechanical objects... Not people
I'm pretty sure somebody using the term "defective person" would be kicked head-first out of any kind of forum

Best Regards

[red]

...
I'd rather have a disabled kid rather than a defective one
But seriously, are not most CPUs disabled down to certain specs, not just chosen because they were made that way

[R101]

This is going to battle it out with Semprons and you call it defective..

[nn_step]

Lets think, Semprons have 100% working cores, This probably does but maybe not 100% in 100% of them

[red]

This probably does but maybe not 100% in 100% of them