Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 39

Thread: Intel E6650 E6750 E6850 and X38 chipsets

  1. #1
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Taipei,Taiwan
    Posts
    145

    Intel E6650 E6750 E6850 and X38 chipsets

    C2D
    E6650 (2.33G/4M/FSB1333)
    E6750 (2.66G/4M/FSB1333)
    E6800 (2.93G/4M/FSB1066)
    E6850 (3.00G/4M/FSB1333)

    another E6XXX (2.13G/2M/FSB1066 without VT)

    Bearlake-G named G33
    Bearlake-G+ G35
    Bearlake-P P35
    Bearlake-X X38 (replace i975X)

    matbe.com
    Last edited by oijkue; 10-17-2006 at 05:23 AM.

  2. #2
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    817
    If those aren't the most mediocre speed-increases I've seen for a long time..
    Is it simply an increase in FSB, or are there going to be some more optimizations done??

    Best Regards
    Silverstone RAVEN RV02|
    Core i5 2500K@4.4GHz, 1,300V|
    Corsair A70|ASUS P67 Sabertooth|Creative X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty|
    Corsair Dominator DDR1600 4x4096MB@DDR3-1600@1.65V|Sapphire HD7970 3GB 1075/1475MHz|
    Corsair Force F120 120GB SSD SATA-II, WD Caviar Black 2x1TB SATA-II 32mb, Hitatchi 320GB SATA-II 16mb|Silverstone DA750 750w PSU|

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Broomfield, CO
    Posts
    3,882
    E6800 (2.93G/4M/FSB1333)
    Not possible, typo? This is obviously a 1066 part....as in the X6800.

    I also expect that these will be B3 stepping Conroes.

  4. #4
    Xtreme 3D Team Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    small town in Indiana
    Posts
    2,285
    what does intel ?txt mean? only new batch has those checked?

  5. #5
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Taipei,Taiwan
    Posts
    145
    Quote Originally Posted by freecableguy
    Not possible, typo? This is obviously a 1066 part....as in the X6800.
    I also expect that these will be B3 stepping Conroes.
    Yes,it is FSB 1066
    I'm wrong

  6. #6
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Herbert's House in Family Guy
    Posts
    2,381
    better stepping, yay 4.3GHz conroe on air?? i'd take that over a 3.7GHz quad core for games. not just money wise but performance wise as well

    E6800 is what ill get b4 yorkfield or K8L

    yeah also is it confirmed that these are B3 stepping? cuz that will make a big difference.
    Last edited by theteamaqua; 10-17-2006 at 05:54 AM.
    E6600 @ 3.6
    IN9 32x MAX
    EVGA 8800Ultra
    750W

  7. #7
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Wales, UK
    Posts
    1,195
    The lower multi's mean tougher overclocking - the e6850 will have the same multi as a e6600 - so unless overclocks are significantly higher, I couldn't justify the increase in price.

    A range of 800fsb part would be far more interesting.

  8. #8
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    594
    C2D
    E6650 (2.33G/4M/FSB1333) 7x333
    E6750 (2.66G/4M/FSB1333) 8x333
    E6800 (2.93G/4M/FSB1066) 11x266
    E6850 (3.00G/4M/FSB1333) 9x333

    E6800 (2.93G/4M/FSB1066)
    This could be a nice overclocker, 11x multi , I wonder how expensive it will be.
    AMD Opteron 148 CABYE 0543 FPBW || DFI LanParty nF4 SLI-DR AD0
    2x 512MB OCZ PC3500 Limited Edition Winbond BH-5 || 2x 512MB Corsair PC3200LL V1.1 Winbond BH-5 || 1x 256MB Mushkin PC3500 LV2 Winbond BH-5
    SAPPHIRE X800GTO2 @ 16P 600/570, Voltmodded, GPU=1,7V/VDD/VDDQ=2,3V
    Zippy PSL-6720P(G1) GAMING ,POWER - I love it!

  9. #9
    Xtreme 3D Mark Team Staff
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Juneau Alaska
    Posts
    7,607
    hopefully these 1333 CPU's dont come on a neuterd motherboard, like the Badaxe is at 1333 strap.

    that would just suck.




    "The command and conquer model," said the EA CEO, "doesn't work. If you think you're going to buy a developer and put your name on the label... you're making a profound mistake."

  10. #10
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Croatia
    Posts
    2,542
    True,this is acctually bad news for overclocking; lower multies and all.
    Maybe they will sell them cheaper with Kentsfield just around the corner??

    I ask because I don't like the idea of a E6300/6400 (overclocked by Intel) and then sold to us for 300$-500$ as E6650/6750
    ________
    MASTURBATION :banana::banana::banana::banana::banana:
    Last edited by XS Janus; 05-12-2011 at 06:14 PM.

  11. #11
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Croatia
    Posts
    2,542
    Quote Originally Posted by onewingedangel
    The lower multi's mean tougher overclocking - the e6850 will have the same multi as a e6600 - so unless overclocks are significantly higher, I couldn't justify the increase in price.

    A range of 800fsb part would be far more interesting.

    Now THAT would be a real BANG for BUCK as far as overclocking goes

    9x200fsb 1.8 GHz sold at a price of current E6300, man that baby would overclock to 4GHz on air for sure (especialy if it would be B3)

    Who knows, maybe as future Celerons or some thing...
    ________
    LovelyWendie
    Last edited by XS Janus; 05-12-2011 at 06:14 PM.

  12. #12
    Xtreme News Addict
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
    Posts
    2,065
    More here


    DailyTech has stumbled across Intel’s latest roadmap that reveals the naming scheme for its upcoming Bearlake chipsets. Bearlake is Intel’s upcoming replacement for the current Broadwater 96x series of chipsets and expected to arrive in 2007. Six variants of Bearlake are expected in the form of Bearlake-Q, Bearlake-QF, Bearlake-X, Bearlake-P, Bearlake-G+ and Bearlake-G. Intel’s upcoming Bearlake series has been named the “3 Series.” On the vPro side of things, Bearlake-Q and Bearlake-QF have been named Intel Q35 and Q33 Express respectively. Consumer high end chipsets Bearlake-X and Bearlake-P will receive the Intel X38 and P35 Express names respectively while mainstream Bearlake-G+ and Bearlake-G receive the Intel G35 and G33 names.

    Intel’s upcoming X38 Express chipset is expected to replace the current Intel 975X Express chipset. The X38 Express brings new features such as PCI Express 2.0 compatibility as well as two full speed PCI Express x16 slots. DDR3 1333 will be the memory standard of choice. On the premium and mainstream side of things is Intel’s G33, G35 and P35 Express chipsets. Intel’s upcoming G33 Express chipset will feature a graphics core that features Intel Clear Video Technology. Memory support on G33 Express will be limited to DDR3-1066 or DDR2-800. Front-side bus speeds of 1333 MHz are supported with the mainstream G33 Express. Stepping up a notch is the G35 Express which features a DirectX 10 compatible graphics core. G35 Express will fully support high definition content playback with HDCP protection. DDR3-1066, DDR2-800 and a 1333 MHz front-side bus are also supported. Intel’s P35 Express will be similar to G35 Express except with the integrated graphics core removed. Intel’s X38, G33, G35 and P35 will be paired with upcoming ICH9, ICH9R and ICH9DH south bridges.

    Moving into 2007 are new platforms as well. The current Averill vPro professional platform will be replaced by the upcoming Weybridge Pro platform. Weybridge Pro is expected to arrive in Q3’07 and based around Intel’s Q35 Express chipset. New features to Weybridge Pro include Intel’s AMT Pro and Intel Trusted Execution Technology (TXT). Intel’s Trusted Execution Technology is new and is designed to protect sensitive information from software attacks. This is performed without compromising usability. Weybridge Pro will also support Intel’s upcoming 1333 MHz front-side bus processors as well.

    Catered towards business users that don’t need advanced management capabilities is the Weybridge Fundamental platform which is expected to arrive the same time as Weybridge Pro. Weybridge Fundamental is based around Intel’s upcoming Q33 Express chipset and adds support for Intel’s AMT technology—a feature only available on Intel’s vPro platform. In addition to Intel AMT, Weybridge Fundamental will be upgraded to support 1066 MHz front-side bus processors. While there’s no platform naming, Intel will also position its 946GZ chipset with Pentium D and Pentium E1000 series processors towards the budget business user.

    On the desktop side of things, Intel’s enthusiast platform retains the Extreme Platform moniker, albeit the Intel X38 Express chipset replaces the current 975X Express chipset in Q3’07. Two premium/mainstream platforms will be available this time around in the form of Salt Creek and Santa Rosa Desktop. Salt Creek is based around Intel’s upcoming Core 2 Quad Q6600 processor and existing Core 2 Duo processors. Premium Salt Creek platforms will feature Intel’s P35, G35 and X38 chipsets while mainstream platforms will feature Intel’s G33 Express chipset. Santa Rosa Desktop systems will feature Core 2 Duo T7000 series processors coupled with Intel’s GM965 or PM965 Express chipsets and essentially be a mobile on desktop platform. Intel Extreme Platform, Salt Creek and Santa Rosa Desktop platforms are all part of Intel’s Viiv multimedia platform. At the value end of things is Intel’s 946GZ Express chipset paired with Intel Pentium E1000 and Celeron 400 series processors.

    Lastly is Intel’s single processor workstation platform. Current Wyloway single processor platform based around Intel’s 975X Express chipset will be replaced by the upcoming Garlow WS platform. Garlow WS is expected to arrive Q3’07 and feature Intel’s upcoming X38 chipset with support for dual and quad-core processors.


    http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=4588

  13. #13
    Admin
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Posts
    12,338
    Quote Originally Posted by Kunaak
    hopefully these 1333 CPU's dont come on a neuterd motherboard, like the Badaxe is at 1333 strap.

    that would just suck.
    They probably will....but I'd also bet that BIOSs will start featuring strap control as boardmakers realize it's causing headaches....and memory manus are requesting it since it's making their products look bad in reviews.

  14. #14
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Chile
    Posts
    4,151
    with how bad motherboard fsb overclock i odnt like the idea of lower multi

    only great thing is b3 stepping this should fly

  15. #15
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Croatia
    Posts
    2,542
    If one could extrapolate form this "Three refreshed models will debut with the upcoming Bearlake 3 series chipsets" and this "The upcoming Core 2 Duo E6800 will arrive clocked at 2.93 GHz?similar to Intel?s Core 2 Extreme X6800. The processor is expected to be Intel?s flagship processor for mainstream segments. Aside from the locked multiplier, the Core 2 Duo E6800 is identical to the Core 2 Extreme X6800."

    One could conclude that they should be at least a bit cheaper than the ones we have now (MHz per $ at least)
    ________
    Fix ps3
    Last edited by XS Janus; 05-12-2011 at 06:15 PM.

  16. #16
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Wales, UK
    Posts
    1,195
    Quote Originally Posted by XS Janus
    9x200fsb 1.8 GHz sold at a price of current E6300, man that baby would overclock to 4GHz on air for sure (especialy if it would be B3)

    Who knows, maybe as future Celerons or some thing...
    Well the 1.8ghz 800fsb allendale is coming in january, as part of the 4xxx series, 9x200, 2m cache, but with vt disabled. I was hoping for a whole range, including 4m cache parts all the way up to the x14 multi that I believe the conroe design tops out at.

  17. #17
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Athens, Greece
    Posts
    3,656
    OC'ing should be a pain in the a** with these 333mhz fsp cpu's.
    From the prescott super high multiplier days we come to the super high fsb days.
    Can't intel just pick the sweet spot?

    Like we've got used to 266mhz fsb...
    Project ZEUS II

    Asus Rampage II Extreme
    Intel I7 920 D0 3930A @ 4.50GHz (21 X 214mhz)
    3 x 2GB G.Skill Trident 1600 @ 1716MHz (6-8-6-20-1N)
    2 x Asus HD 6870 CrossFire @ 1000/1100MHz
    OCZ Vertex 2 60GB | Intel X25-M 120GB | WD Velociraptor 150GB | Seagate FreeAgent XTreme 1.5TB esata
    Asus Xonar DX | Logitech Z-5500 | LG W2600HP 26" S-IPS LCD

    Watercooling setup:
    1st loop -> Radiator: 2 x ThermoChill PA120.3 | Pump: Laing DDC-3.25 with Alphacool HF 38 top | CPU: Swiftech Apogee XT | Chipset: Swiftech MCW-NBMAX | Tubing: Masterkleer 1/2" UV
    2nd loop -> Radiator: ThermoChill PA120.3 | Pump: Laing DDC-3.2 with Alphacool HF 38 top | GPU: 2 x EK FC-6870 | Tubing: Masterkleer 1/2" UV


    Assembled in Mountain Mods Ascension Trinity
    Powered by Corsair Professional Series Gold AX1200

  18. #18
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Sugar Land, TX
    Posts
    1,418
    Who knows. Maybe the new chipset will go up to 800Mhz FSB and the memory ratios might actually work

  19. #19
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Philippines ^_^
    Posts
    1,618
    I like to see the E4+++ series.. any ES around???
    Asus P5W64 WS Professional , DFI Infinity 965P-S (testing)
    X6800 , E6750 es
    Micron Fatbodies , Micron D9gkx oem, Crucial 8000, Crucial Tracer 8500 (incomming)
    Ati FireGL V5100, Elsa FireGL V3100
    water cooling setup (EK 775 cpu block, swiftech NB Block, Swiftech pump, BI dual pass dual 120mm)
    Silverstone OP650
    raptors, baracuda

  20. #20
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    896
    Perhaps these will be relegated to the 'mainstream' segment that E6300/E6400 occupies? I've heard Wolfdale ES in April, shipping Oct/Nov

  21. #21
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Philippines ^_^
    Posts
    1,618
    nice..
    Asus P5W64 WS Professional , DFI Infinity 965P-S (testing)
    X6800 , E6750 es
    Micron Fatbodies , Micron D9gkx oem, Crucial 8000, Crucial Tracer 8500 (incomming)
    Ati FireGL V5100, Elsa FireGL V3100
    water cooling setup (EK 775 cpu block, swiftech NB Block, Swiftech pump, BI dual pass dual 120mm)
    Silverstone OP650
    raptors, baracuda

  22. #22
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Chile
    Posts
    4,151
    that bearlake info is so old news, i wrote specs od desktop bearlake like 1 month ago (24th of september)

    here is the info:

    High End:

    Bearlake-X Q3 2007(reemplazaria a bad axe 975)
    FSB1333
    PCI-Express 16x (2)
    Soporte DDR2 800 y DDR3 1333


    Mainstream:

    Bearlake-P Q2 2007(reemplazaria a P965)
    FSB1333
    PCI-Express 16x
    Soporte DDR2 800 y DDR3 1066


    Integrada:

    Bearlake-G Q2 2007 (reemplazaria a G965)
    FSB1066
    PCI-Express 16x
    Soporte DDR2 800


    Bearlake-G+ Q3 2007 (reemplazaria a G965)
    FSB1333
    PCI-Express 16x
    Soporte DDR2 800 y DDR3 1066

    Source Chilehardware

  23. #23
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Slovenia
    Posts
    775
    looks nice
    Core Quad Q9300
    ASUS P5Q-PRO
    4GB RAM
    Ati Radeon 4890
    Enermax Liberty 620w

  24. #24
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Slovenia, EU
    Posts
    30
    Too bad that I already have a E6600 CPU.

    Why kill the 975X chipset that soon?
    Last edited by GMK; 10-18-2006 at 02:37 AM.

  25. #25
    OC Jedi (on stand-by)
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,576
    Would a E6600 at 9*333 be exactly as fast as a E6850 at stock?
    If thats the case, I dont think there will be much of a performance boost over 266FSB CPUs.
    Though it might be interesting if they come with B3 stepping.
    But I would still prefer the 200*9 Allendale over any new Conroes
    オタク
    "Perfection is a state you should always try to attain, yet one you can never reach." - me =)

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •