Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 48 of 48

Thread: Slowest SuperPi scores ever

  1. #26
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    397
    Toshiba Satellite pro 4600
    900mhz p3-m
    128mb ram
    20gb
    windows XP Pro

    17 minute 1m

    don't even ask how long for a 32m.

  2. #27
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    468
    Who will be the first one to do a week (168 hours) for 32M

    What happens if Prime & SuperPi are ran together? Would be much much much slower.


  3. #28
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    10
    Quote Originally Posted by SMa
    Who will be the first one to do a week (168 hours) for 32M

    What happens if Prime & SuperPi are ran together? Would be much much much slower.

    No, no, no.

    Thats not allowed to slow down the computer with other program loading.

    That way with an endless cicle I can get much much worse score with my 486SX.

    Please play this fairly. It cannot checked so this depends on the player's conscience.

    In my test results no other program running background that artifically slow down the system for worse results.

    As I said: the 1M on this shlt can take up to five days, i don't really wanna run it.

    Please use 16K test in this slow area to determine a score. You don't really want to wait that time till 1M completed on a computer like this.

  4. #29
    My own little world
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    The Septic Isle
    Posts
    699
    Agreed, to a point.

    don't run any proggies to slow it down. just a Basic OS install will do (Win95 on an 8MB 386? Suppose that's pushing the envelope a bit. I'll lookee for a Linux install, see if I can get my head round it).

    16K to show some numbers, anything longer at your own discretion
    But I'm still up for running 32M...

    organising getting my 386 back. Fires up still
    The Apricot 286 does too!
    Quote Originally Posted by JF-AMD View Post
    Dual proc client systems are like sex in high school. Everyone talks about it but nobody is really doing it.

  5. #30
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Tallinn, Estonia
    Posts
    468
    Quote Originally Posted by dchard
    As I said: the 1M on this shlt can take up to five days, i don't really wanna run it.
    as you have the same cpu as mine was, it should take 2 days max.. and linux version will complete it even faster..

  6. #31
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    311
    Welcome to Xtremesystems.org everyone!
    Any machine here can smoke the fastest guy working on it by hand.
    Last edited by PkG.1337; 06-20-2006 at 11:04 PM.

  7. #32
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Taiwan
    Posts
    25
    darn...that beats my nehemiah.



    o/c'ed to 1Ghz


  8. #33
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    [EU] Latvia, Jelgava
    Posts
    1,689
    I have Cyrix 100Mhz lappy, but spi are not running, just errors.
    I got P133, and OC friendly s7 board, with 256MB ram. Will buy 200/233Mhz MMX pentium for this machine Oldscool, here i come.

  9. #34
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Sugar Land, TX
    Posts
    1,418
    Time to break out the P133 laptop I have.

  10. #35
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    10
    Quote Originally Posted by ewitte
    Time to break out the P133 laptop I have.
    I have one too, I'll run a test on it.

    Dchard

    Oh by the way: OK, I'm in game: first I run the 1M on SX, than 32M, an d also on a 133MHz P1 laptop with 32M ram, and win98 on it but on this just an 1M.

  11. #36
    Champion
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Hungary
    Posts
    1,189
    Welcome on XS my friend's Wait 1M and 32M
    "We are competing, competing to win. And the main motivation is to compete for victory" - Ayrton Senna

  12. #37
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    10
    I done with the 1M superpi test on a P1 133MHz laptop with 32MB RAM, and no L2 cache, Win98

    1M Calcualtion time: 53min 03sec

    Validation picture here

    For the test 1M and 32M on 486SX I need to borrow an UPS

    The game is on.

    Dchard

    MOD: for users who get errors on old machines with win95/98: use the original superpi:

    ftp://pi.super-computing.org/pub/exe...s/super_pi.zip
    Last edited by dchard; 06-24-2006 at 04:37 AM.

  13. #38
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    [EU] Latvia, Jelgava
    Posts
    1,689
    I ran 16K on Cyrix lappy, 75Mhz actually and 24Mb ram, w95. 16K time 7.26m
    I ran spi on s7 rig too (P133 256MB SD-RAM w2k) underclocked to 75Mhz(50FSBx1.5), 16K 13.059sec, and overclocked to 188Mhz(62x3) 16k 6.059sec. I really dunno why Cyrix lappy are too slow. I started to run 1m now, but i will not finish today

  14. #39
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    10
    It seems, that an old 386 33MHz AMD computer with almost 4MB of RAM should come not far, so the 1M and 32M tests on 486 SX will be delayed.

    This is a borad integrated one

    I think the 32M on this it takes more than two weeks, far more

    With the 486SX the 32M with precise calculations from 16K results: it takes ~ 1/3 month.

    Dchard

  15. #40
    HVAC/R student
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Em City
    Posts
    519
    What would be nice to see is how slow a modern machine can go, due to crappy software. My mothers laptop which has a 1,7GHz Pentium M and 256MB ram, uses like 2.5min on 1M.
    ...is no longer working as an assistant HVAC/R-installer...
    But, is still blasting 20000 songs of real Rap

  16. #41
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    [EU] Latvia, Jelgava
    Posts
    1,689
    OK, who wants SLOOWW times, use w95. 16k on w95 7.26m, 16k on w98SE 52sec. Same config.

  17. #42
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    10
    Hi!

    386 40MHz AMD cpu, 3712KB simm ram, 200MB HDD, VGA with 512KB ram (ISA), Win95 Floppy Edition(!).

    Original SuperPi 16K running.

    Why Floppy Edition? Because the CD version crashes with "Memory control error" before it can start the file copying stage in setup. The CD is fine (I setup systems with it).

    Dchard

  18. #43
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    296
    A 486sx doesnt even have a maths coprocessor so its a bit unfair.

    We had an 086 till recently, it was a full system & I used it to print documents off. I actually sold it on ebay for £40

    8.66mhz I think it was, I used to go make tea and a sandwich while it started so cant remember now. We even had a couple games, tetris 3d and double dragon! 512k was its total memory or maybe half that, but is that even enough to run superpi? Only had a 5.25" FDD too but I think I would have used a nullmodem cable and zcopy to transfer the program.


    The oldest machine Ive used was a Wang machine (1970's?). Maybe it was called that because of the 1 foot long floppy disks it used

  19. #44
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    10
    "is that even enough to run superpi?"

    No. Not because SuperPi, but you cannot run a proper OS to run Pi (win, or linux).

    And I'am in trouble too: SuperPi can be started, but hangs immediately, after I start the 16K calculation. Interesting, because win95 is running quiet well. I think I need a little ram. I can buy 5-6 pieces for just 0,5$

    Next week I will do this, and will try again.

    Dchard

  20. #45
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    274
    My 486sx/25 can be set to 7MHz in the BIOS, I don't bother running Superpi with that
    Waiting for Crysis

  21. #46
    X.I.P
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    1,964
    Quote Originally Posted by Kasparz
    I have Cyrix 100Mhz lappy, but spi are not running, just errors.
    I got P133, and OC friendly s7 board, with 256MB ram. Will buy 200/233Mhz MMX pentium for this machine Oldscool, here i come.
    u overclock too much lol

  22. #47
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    99
    Hey does anyone know how to mod a graphing calculator to make it calculate past 10 decimals? I think the 4mhz 8bit z80 in the Ti-83 and 84 will take the crown as the slowest calculation. I'm worried that the batteries won't last the days to calculate even 16K.

  23. #48
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Surat, India.
    Posts
    1,309
    LOL.. its like we are all back in old times. when P series was going to be launched. God Dammit those were the times.
    Sound: Asus Essense ST | Wharfedale Diamond 9.1 | Norge 2060 Stereo amp | Wharfedale SW150 sub (coming soon)
    Camera Gear: Canon 6D | Canon 500D | Canon 17-40L | Canon 24-105L | Canon 50mm f1.4 | Canon 85mm f1.8 | Rokinon 14mm f2.8 | Sigma 10-20EX HSM | Benro A3580F + Vanguard SBH250 | Bag full of filters and stuff

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •