MMM
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 51 to 75 of 88

Thread: 90k done :)

  1. #51
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    1,184
    Thanks you all!

    Quote Originally Posted by k|ngp|n
    Nice job again kinc or both of you . The 05 should be smokin at those clocks.
    Yeah it should, but there is alot of bugs with X1950 and late catalysts, that holds back the performence But I've just bought back my -100C X1900 master card for some 05 action

  2. #52
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    87
    90K wall smashed finally!

    Great score Kinc, congratulations

  3. #53
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    4,714
    Insane score Kinc !

    congrats
    Where courage, motivation and ignorance meet, a persistent idiot awakens.

  4. #54
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    247
    finally you got it!!!


    congrats man!

    awesome score!

    Marco
    XtremeHardware.it
    Asrock Italian Official Support Forum, Enermax and Sapphire Support Forum

  5. #55
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    1000 Elysian Park Ave
    Posts
    2,669
    Awesome, how many FPS in CSS?
    i3-8100 | GTX 970
    Ryzen 5 1600 | RX 580
    Assume nothing; Question everything

  6. #56
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Mumbai, India
    Posts
    1,090
    Dat is a super kool run there, as usual.. all I do over here is show "Respect" to all those who have da edge.

  7. #57
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    2,018
    any 03/05/06 runs ?

  8. #58
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    1,184
    Quote Originally Posted by TaPaKaH
    any 03/05/06 runs ?
    I'm working on solwing the problem wehere Catalyst thinks the cards works at the max temp when is is actuall below 0C. This problem is not showing in Catalyst 6.3 and I think I first noticied it in Catalyst 6.7 or even 6.6, not sure. This problem needs to be solved for the performence to get back in 05 and 06. As it is now X1900 would be better then X1950 in 05.

  9. #59
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Saskatoon, SK
    Posts
    1,149
    congrats Kinc...you deserve it.
    • Intel Core i7 875K @ 3.86GHz 1.35v /w Intel Extreme Tower Heatsink
    • Intel Extreme DP55KG
    • 2x2GB Kingston HyperX PC3-10666
    • ATI HD5970 2GB @ 850/1,200
    • Lian-Li PC-7B
    • Corsair TX750 PSU

  10. #60
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    835
    all the time impressive results....congrats kinc

  11. #61
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    5,931
    grats kinc, would you say the score is held back by the cpu or gpu's?

    What i mean is, whats the biggest bottleneck in your opinion, do we need faster videocards or faster cpu's for 100k?

  12. #62
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    1,184
    Quote Originally Posted by Revv23
    grats kinc, would you say the score is held back by the cpu or gpu's?

    What i mean is, whats the biggest bottleneck in your opinion, do we need faster videocards or faster cpu's for 100k?
    Cpu, the only test not limited by cpu is nature. For 100k tough we will need more fps in nature as well since i doubt we will see c2d 3d stable over 5300 in the near future. Nv nature + ati system would be nice :-)

  13. #63
    Xtreme Owner Charles Wirth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    11,656
    Grats again on the 90K a huge milestone for sure.
    Intel 9990XE @ 5.1Ghz
    ASUS Rampage VI Extreme Omega
    GTX 2080 ti Galax Hall of Fame
    64GB Galax Hall of Fame
    Intel Optane
    Platimax 1245W

    Intel 3175X
    Asus Dominus Extreme
    GRX 1080ti Galax Hall of Fame
    96GB Patriot Steel
    Intel Optane 900P RAID

  14. #64
    Slovenian OC Master
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Slovenia
    Posts
    1,089
    Quote Originally Posted by Kinc
    I'm working on solwing the problem wehere Catalyst thinks the cards works at the max temp when is is actuall below 0C. This problem is not showing in Catalyst 6.3 and I think I first noticied it in Catalyst 6.7 or even 6.6, not sure. This problem needs to be solved for the performence to get back in 05 and 06. As it is now X1900 would be better then X1950 in 05.
    I was actualy amazed when i saw how not so good 1950 in 05 is, so that would be drivers issue?
    OC-Lab.si!!

  15. #65
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    1,184
    Quote Originally Posted by zbogorgon
    I was actualy amazed when i saw how not so good 1950 in 05 is, so that would be drivers issue?
    Part driver and part hardware, x1900 is better in 05. Im going to run x1900 in 05 soon to see if it fixes the problem.

  16. #66
    Slovenian OC Master
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Slovenia
    Posts
    1,089
    the best score in 05 i got with 1900xt 256mb , and I had 1900xtx and 1950xtx, you should try too
    OC-Lab.si!!

  17. #67
    Admin
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    North Texas
    Posts
    5,551
    Very nice overclocking Kinc - congrats to your hard work
    UNDER THE ICE .com
    Phase Change Cooling

    is the remedy

  18. #68
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    1,184
    Quote Originally Posted by zbogorgon
    the best score in 05 i got with 1900xt 256mb , and I had 1900xtx and 1950xtx, you should try too
    I just bought back my X1900 master that can handle -100+. Pared with my -100+ X1900XTX I hope to see great scores in 05.
    Last edited by Kinc; 10-10-2006 at 08:40 AM.

  19. #69
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    738
    Good luck my Friend!!

    Lets se a killer score soon!!
    Regards
    Overklokk

    First in world over 90k in 3D Mark 03 with 90400p
    http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=5160409


  20. #70
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,313
    Quote Originally Posted by charlie
    100k... wow that has me thinking.

    Probably with G80.
    Kinc = da man!

    Charlie, G80 or even G90 wont do much for 3D01 (if anything). Afterall, reason why C2D got so much higher than P4/Athlon64 is because 3D01 is so CPU limited.

    However, as you well know, G80 and company will do great things in 3DMark05 and especially 3DMark06.

    Kinc, any chance you can run a Quake3 timedemo (demo001)? I'm curious if Quake3 scales to 5 digits!!

    24/7: A64 3000+ (\_/) @2.4Ghz, 1.4V
    1 GB OCZ Gold (='.'=) 240 2-2-2-5
    Giga-byte NF3 (")_(") K8NSC-939
    XFX 6800 16/6 NV5 @420/936, 1.33V

  21. #71
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    1,184
    X1900 Crossfire fully vmodded rigged and ready to go. Mousepots all over.


  22. #72
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    137
    oo, that looks really nice, go get those WRs now!

  23. #73
    ¿
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    4,772
    That rig should pull off a hardcore set of numbers, good luck kinc.

  24. #74
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    5,931
    Quote Originally Posted by Kinc
    X1900 Crossfire fully vmodded rigged and ready to go. Mousepots all over.

    Haha! Nice work on that NB cooler!!!

    I almost forgot, good luck!

  25. #75
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    1,184
    Just ran the rigg and it is looking reall good. Figured I woud max out the cores on the 1900s with vmods and the results is jaw dropping. With 1.7V vcore/vddci and -100C 927/927MHz works great. With the cpu @ 4GHz that equaled 152fps in gt3 of 3dmark 05. I'm noticing serveral periods of the test that are cpu/mem limited so hopefully we will see up to 156fps in the end.

    The problem running the cards so cold with these pots is that the cold is transfered very easaly to the pcb. The second internal probe of the card in atitool shiwed a temp of -33C wich is by far the lowest temp Ive seen there.

    I had to shut the rig down before I could cool down the cpu bacuse the pwm area of the cards was deepfrozen.

    Better insulation tomorrow

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •