MMM
Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 97

Thread: Intel's Response For Q3 '07: Yorkfield

  1. #1
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    U.S of freakin' A
    Posts
    1,931

    Cool Intel's Response For Q3 '07: Yorkfield

    This is what the K8L will face, according to VR-Zone:

    Yorkfield Extreme Edition based on the 45nm Penry core architecture will meet heads-on with AMD Altair based on the 65nm K8L core in Q3 2007. Both are quad core offerings but AMD touted theirs to be a native quad-core with dedicated 512KB L2 cache for each core and an additional 2MB L3 cache for the 4 cores to share. Intel has different plans for Yorkfield. Instead of sharing L2 cache for all the cores, the L2 cache size is further increased. Due to its advanced 45nm process technology, Yorkfield XE is able to pack a total of 12MB L2 cache (2 x 6MB L2) and still achieving a much smaller die size. The clock speed is significantly higher at 3.46-3.74GHz too.
    And Intel can pull it off too.. Their 45nm process will be top notch, and the Core architecture doesn't consume much power due to it's incredible efficiency.. It will also have SSE4, the most sigificant extension to Intel's SIMD since SSE2..

    I hope the K8L is a badass mofo, because it will be facing an uphill battle next year..

    Interesting times ahead folks....interesting times indeed!



    Source
    Last edited by perkam; 10-05-2006 at 03:19 AM.

  2. #2
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    U.S of freakin' A
    Posts
    1,931
    I hope the game developers get cracking on making new engines that can handle these quad core monsters.

    With all of this power, it would be a shame for any of it to go to waste.

    Lets hope Alan Wake is the first of many.
    Last edited by Carfax; 10-04-2006 at 02:36 PM.

  3. #3
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    3,012
    i wonder how this thing would oc i am abit dissapointed tho seeing that it won't share the l2 because if it did then i might buy conroe and wait for a shared l2 version of this
    CPU: Intel Core i7 3930K @ 4.5GHz
    Mobo: Asus Rampage IV Extreme
    RAM: 32GB (8x4GB) Patriot Viper EX @ 1866mhz
    GPU: EVGA GTX Titan (1087Boost/6700Mem)
    Physx: Evga GTX 560 2GB
    Sound: Creative XFI Titanium
    Case: Modded 700D
    PSU: Corsair 1200AX (Fully Sleeved)
    Storage: 2x120GB OCZ Vertex 3's in RAID 0 + WD 600GB V-Raptor + Seagate 1TB
    Cooling: XSPC Raystorm, 2x MCP 655's, FrozenQ Warp Drive, EX360+MCR240+EX120 Rad's

  4. #4
    YouTube Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Klaatu barada nikto
    Posts
    17,574
    yawn, more like a pocket monster...
    basic math is Increase FP performance and add Cache liberally...
    hmm almost expected.. Funny fact that most people miss is that K8 still beats Conroe in interger performance...
    Fast computers breed slow, lazy programmers
    The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost simplicity. It is a price which the very rich find most hard to pay.
    http://www.lighterra.com/papers/modernmicroprocessors/
    Modern Ram, makes an old overclocker miss BH-5 and the fun it was

  5. #5
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    U.S of freakin' A
    Posts
    1,931
    Quote Originally Posted by nn_step
    yawn, more like a pocket monster...
    basic math is Increase FP performance and add Cache liberally...
    hmm almost expected.. Funny fact that most people miss is that K8 still beats Conroe in interger performance...
    Are you kidding? Conroe slaughters the K8 in integer performance!

    The K8L might be better than Yorkfield clock for clock in FP, but due to Yorkfield's clockspeed advantage, I think Yorkfield may have the upper hand overall.

    i am abit dissapointed tho seeing that it won't share the l2
    The cache is still shared, just not between all four cores. The reason is probably because it's difficult to get four cores to share cache effectively at the same time.

  6. #6
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Gotham City, Sweden
    Posts
    367
    Seems like an act of desperation to me. Intel must know that the Kenty sucks badly (Hallo Prescott!) We are seeing the Pentium D rutin again on the new quads from Intel. The non native thing seems to have a bad effect on power consumption. When Intel adds cores the heat multplies with the number of cores added. When Amd adds cores it stays in the same Tdp value as before the core addition.

    And the k8L has some new advanced power feats. that will increase performance/w even more.


    And then Intel have that fsb 1333 to worry about (it sucks). Amd will win easy at least on the server plattform, due to memory and bandwidth performance.
    Last edited by Poodle; 10-04-2006 at 03:11 PM.
    AMD Phenom II 940BE | DFI LP DK790B-M2RS | Echo audio Layla 3G | 8GB Corsair C5 PC6400 | Sapphire HD3870 with HR-03+ | Genelec 8030A | Samsung 244T | Antec P182 gun metal | Thermal right Ultra120 | UPS: APC BACK-UPS RS 1500VA | Windows Vista Ultimate 64 | DAW: Ableton/Sonar | WAN: 100/10Mbit/s | OS on: WD Velocioraptor Storage: Rocket Raid 2300 PCI-E + 4*400GB Samsung T133 @Raid5. Firewall: Tyan Tomcat 945GM | Core Duo T2600 | 2*512MB ram | Nexus PM PSM-5000 | Picu PSU.


    "People who enjoy waving flags
    don't deserve to have one".

  7. #7
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    510
    Quote Originally Posted by Poodle
    Seems like an act of desperation to me. Intel must know that the Kenty sucks badly (Hallo Prescott!) We are seeing the Pentium D rutin again on the new quads from Intel. The non native thing seems to have a bad effect on power consumption. When Intel adds cores the heat multplies with the number of cores added. When Amd adds cores it stays in the same Tdp value as before the core addition.
    That's because Intel's TDP right now are much lower than AMD's. Even with the doubling, Kentsfield's power consumption is roughly the same as a FX-62.

  8. #8
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    793
    Quote Originally Posted by Carfax
    This is what the K8L will face, according to VR-Zone:



    And Intel can pull it off too.. Their 45nm process will be top notch, and the Core architecture doesn't consume much power due to it's incredible efficiency.. It will also have SSE4, the most sigificant extension to Intel's SIMD since SSE2..

    I hope the K8L is a badass mofo, because it will be facing an uphill battle next year..

    Interesting times ahead folks....interesting times indeed!

    Source
    You are a walking Intel advertisement. SSE4 does nothing and at 3.74 with a large heatdump I would like to see that on their stock cooler.
    Quote Originally Posted by IYP
    impecible reasoning....the jedi mind skills of the stupid people are overwhelming....but they shall not assimilate me!

  9. #9
    YouTube Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Klaatu barada nikto
    Posts
    17,574
    Quote Originally Posted by Carfax
    Are you kidding? Conroe slaughters the K8 in integer performance!

    The K8L might be better than Yorkfield clock for clock in FP, but due to Yorkfield's clockspeed advantage, I think Yorkfield may have the upper hand overall.
    funny considering that K8 beats conroe at the same clock speed in
    SM Cryptography ( 8.2% faster) and SM STREAM (4.3% faster) which If I remember correctly are both mainly integer programs that use lots and lots of memory
    Fast computers breed slow, lazy programmers
    The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost simplicity. It is a price which the very rich find most hard to pay.
    http://www.lighterra.com/papers/modernmicroprocessors/
    Modern Ram, makes an old overclocker miss BH-5 and the fun it was

  10. #10
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    510
    Quote Originally Posted by nn_step
    funny considering that K8 beats conroe at the same clock speed in
    SM Cryptography ( 8.2% faster) and SM STREAM (4.3% faster) which If I remember correctly are both mainly integer programs that use lots and lots of memory
    Funny considering a C2E scores 18.5 on the single-threaded SpecInt2006 benchmark while a 3GHz Opteron only scores 13.3. Cryptography is dependent on a few instructions and Stream is a memory test.

  11. #11
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    279
    I do not see yorkfield as an act of desperation. AMD is the company with their backs against the wall needing to prove something. K8L is getting delayed, and it will be interesting to see what makes it to the market first. Draft N wireless or K8L. Intel has stepped up their game and looks like they will be following their plans for a new architecture every two years.

    AMD needs to step it up or they will get steam rolled. AMD has woken a sleeping giant. I'm not a fan of Intel or AMD, I am a fan of performance. If K8L is the best thing since sliced bread when it comes out I will buy it. I just don't think they will be able to keep up like some of the fanboys believe.
    P182
    E6400 @ stock
    Asus P5B Deluxe
    8800 GTS 320 mb
    G.skill PC6400 2x2 gigs
    CL x-fi xtreme music
    PCP&C Silencer 750
    3 x 160 gb 16 mb cache WD r.e. hard drives (raid 0)
    Dual Layer burner
    Ultima 90
    Vista 32


    Coming soon: 4x4 or penryn, another 4 gb's of memory, and Vista 64


  12. #12
    YouTube Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Klaatu barada nikto
    Posts
    17,574
    Quote Originally Posted by accord99
    Funny considering a C2E scores 18.5 on the single-threaded SpecInt2006 benchmark while a 3GHz Opteron only scores 13.3. Cryptography is dependent on a few instructions and Stream is a memory test.
    rather unique since techinically conroe should be able to do 4 integer operations per cycle while AMD can only do 3...
    Funny, then again conroe has 1 complex integer unit and 3 simple and AMD just has 3 complex
    Fast computers breed slow, lazy programmers
    The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost simplicity. It is a price which the very rich find most hard to pay.
    http://www.lighterra.com/papers/modernmicroprocessors/
    Modern Ram, makes an old overclocker miss BH-5 and the fun it was

  13. #13
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    happy place
    Posts
    2,337
    too bad , cache dont' mean much for AMD architecture.
    --===== proud owner of new razor tarantula gaming keyboard =====--

  14. #14
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    U.S of freakin' A
    Posts
    1,931
    Quote Originally Posted by .sentinel
    You are a walking Intel advertisement. SSE4 does nothing and at 3.74 with a large heatdump I would like to see that on their stock cooler.
    Obviously you've never seen nor heard anything about SSE4.. I think I'll just let you remain ignorant and laugh at you

    Also, if this chip is real, it will be on 45nm, smaller process than what Core 2 is on now, so it will consume less energy and have less leakage.

  15. #15
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    U.S of freakin' A
    Posts
    1,931
    Quote Originally Posted by nn_step
    rather unique since techinically conroe should be able to do 4 integer operations per cycle while AMD can only do 3...
    Funny, then again conroe has 1 complex integer unit and 3 simple and AMD just has 3 complex
    NN_step, this is overtly biased even for you..

    Seriously, the P-M family and all it's derivatives are well known to be extremely strong in integer.

    Even Yonah rocks the K8 in integer, let alone Core 2..

  16. #16
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,696
    Quote Originally Posted by nn_step
    funny considering that K8 beats conroe at the same clock speed in
    SM Cryptography ( 8.2% faster) and SM STREAM (4.3% faster) which If I remember correctly are both mainly integer programs that use lots and lots of memory
    But the question is, does that have a noticable impact on the real world use?
    Workstation:
    3960X | 32GB G.Skill 2133 | Asus Rampage IV Extreme
    3*EVGA GTX580 HC2 3GB | 3*Dell U3011
    4*Crucial M4 256GB R0 | 6*3TB WD Green R6
    Areca 1680ix-24 + 4GB | 2*Pioneer BDR-205 | Enermax Plat 1500W
    Internal W/C | PC-P80 | G19 | G700 | G27
    Destop Audio:
    Squeezebox Duet | Beresford TC-7520 Caiman modded | NAD M3 | MA RX8 | HD650 | ATH-ES7
    Man Cave:
    PT-AT5000E | TXP65VT30 | PR-SC5509 | PA-MC5500 | MA GX300*2, GXFX*4, GXC350 | 2*BK Monolith+
    Gaming on the go:
    Alienware M18x
    i7 2920XM | 16GB DDR3 1600
    2*6990 | WLED 1080P
    2*Crucial M4 256GB | BD-RW
    BT 375 | Intel 6300 | 330W PSU

    2011 Audi R8 V10 Ibis White ABT Tuned - 600HP

  17. #17
    Live Long And Overclock
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    14,058
    nn, don't try to threadjack,

    Everyone else chill. There have been many sources of info on K8L but only 1 for Yorkfield.

    Perkam

  18. #18
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    1,933
    I like aggravate discussions wiiiiiiiii
    Last edited by perkam; 10-04-2006 at 03:50 PM.

  19. #19
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Philippines ^_^
    Posts
    1,618
    i'll wait for the real thing an let it fight in a bout..
    Asus P5W64 WS Professional , DFI Infinity 965P-S (testing)
    X6800 , E6750 es
    Micron Fatbodies , Micron D9gkx oem, Crucial 8000, Crucial Tracer 8500 (incomming)
    Ati FireGL V5100, Elsa FireGL V3100
    water cooling setup (EK 775 cpu block, swiftech NB Block, Swiftech pump, BI dual pass dual 120mm)
    Silverstone OP650
    raptors, baracuda

  20. #20
    YouTube Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Klaatu barada nikto
    Posts
    17,574
    Quote Originally Posted by erwinz
    i'll wait for the real thing an let it fight in a bout..
    a very valid statement. Honestly we have no idea how Intel's or AMD's monster will turn out but all we know is that the next few years are going to very interesting times for us
    Fast computers breed slow, lazy programmers
    The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost simplicity. It is a price which the very rich find most hard to pay.
    http://www.lighterra.com/papers/modernmicroprocessors/
    Modern Ram, makes an old overclocker miss BH-5 and the fun it was

  21. #21
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    175
    I'm wondering, what exactly are the advantages of reducing 90nm to 65nm and on to 45nm? Someone mentioned reduced power consumption.

  22. #22
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Chile
    Posts
    4,151
    Quote Originally Posted by nn_step
    funny considering that K8 beats conroe at the same clock speed in
    SM Cryptography ( 8.2% faster) and SM STREAM (4.3% faster) which If I remember correctly are both mainly integer programs that use lots and lots of memory
    that means nothing, maybe a crappy car can beat a ferrari at 20km/h but the ferrari at 300km/h beat it.

    not saying C2D is a ferrari nor amd is a crappy car.

    K8L will be good and also intel will have a good cpu this "new" cpu is just a conroe with some minor features added + the process shrink.

    After this one Intel will have a awsome chip with many new things

  23. #23
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Brownsburg, IN USA
    Posts
    414
    Quote Originally Posted by Carfax
    This is what the K8L will face, according to VR-Zone:



    And Intel can pull it off too.. Their 45nm process will be top notch, and the Core architecture doesn't consume much power due to it's incredible efficiency.. It will also have SSE4, the most sigificant extension to Intel's SIMD since SSE2..

    I hope the K8L is a badass mofo, because it will be facing an uphill battle next year..

    Interesting times ahead folks....interesting times indeed!

    Source

    OMG.... IT'S GOING TO TAKE OVER THE WORLD!!!


    Let's reserve judgment until the product is on the market shall we?
    en4cer's system!

    DFI LANPARTY DK 790FX-M2RS
    AMD Phenom 9850 BE @ 3.4Ghz 1.35v
    4GB Corsair Dominator @ 1066MHz 5-5-5 2.2v
    Visiontek ATI Radeon HD4870
    Creative X-Fi Xtreme Gamer
    2x Western Digital 320GB SATA-II
    Lian-Li PC-A17B Case
    Corsair 750TX 750W Power Supply
    Klipsch Promedia Ultra 5.1 Speakers
    Windows Vista Ultimate x64


    HEAT

  24. #24
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    U.S of freakin' A
    Posts
    1,931
    Quote Originally Posted by Theli
    I'm wondering, what exactly are the advantages of reducing 90nm to 65nm and on to 45nm? Someone mentioned reduced power consumption.
    Reduced power consumption, aswell as a higher transistor budget meaning they can add more features to the core, while not increasing the size.

    Also, they can make more processors at lower prices.

    All in all, process mastery is extremely important, and it's how Intel has managed to become such a giant in the semi-conductor industry.

  25. #25
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    3,012
    Quote Originally Posted by Carfax
    Are you kidding? Conroe slaughters the K8 in integer performance!

    The K8L might be better than Yorkfield clock for clock in FP, but due to Yorkfield's clockspeed advantage, I think Yorkfield may have the upper hand overall.



    The cache is still shared, just not between all four cores. The reason is probably because it's difficult to get four cores to share cache effectively at the same time.
    What i mant was that i wanted it to share it! look at conroe and how it benifits surely it would multiply with 4 cores!
    CPU: Intel Core i7 3930K @ 4.5GHz
    Mobo: Asus Rampage IV Extreme
    RAM: 32GB (8x4GB) Patriot Viper EX @ 1866mhz
    GPU: EVGA GTX Titan (1087Boost/6700Mem)
    Physx: Evga GTX 560 2GB
    Sound: Creative XFI Titanium
    Case: Modded 700D
    PSU: Corsair 1200AX (Fully Sleeved)
    Storage: 2x120GB OCZ Vertex 3's in RAID 0 + WD 600GB V-Raptor + Seagate 1TB
    Cooling: XSPC Raystorm, 2x MCP 655's, FrozenQ Warp Drive, EX360+MCR240+EX120 Rad's

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •