Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 33

Thread: Asus P5W64 PRO

  1. #1
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    178

    Asus P5W64 PRO

    Ok so i just spend 260 euros on the Asus P5W64 pro.
    No wonder they call it the wall street quartet! U need to take a mortage to buy this puppy

    Now after having had the P5WDH, and being frustrated by the vdrops im now being frustrated by the overvolting that this motheboard does.Besides that im running 10C warmer, on this board according to probe compared to the P5WDH.

    e.g. I set 1.4v in the bios, probe and cpuz reads 1.45 lol

    Which basically leaves me very confused, the temperature reading coming from this mobo and CPU differ a lot compared to my old P5WDH setup.
    I know there might not be so many owners for this board yet, but if u happen to be reading this then feel free to shed some light on this.
    E6600 L629B
    Asus Striker Extreme testing. I hope DFI can make my dreams come true!
    CELL SHOCK PC6400
    Tuniq tower 120
    MSI 7900GTO
    OCZ 600W

  2. #2
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    465
    Have you tried seeing what the CoreTemp program reports?

    Get it here...

    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=103638

  3. #3
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    178
    @timko, now thats really ironic, Now Core temp reports lower temperatures than my probe. What can i conclude from this.......

    e.g. now @ 1.5v core temp reads 71C and probe 75C go figure
    E6600 L629B
    Asus Striker Extreme testing. I hope DFI can make my dreams come true!
    CELL SHOCK PC6400
    Tuniq tower 120
    MSI 7900GTO
    OCZ 600W

  4. #4
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    465
    Did you run coretemp on your previous P5WDH setup at all and see what difference there was between coretemp and Probe on that?

  5. #5
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    178
    Yes i did, i looked up my notes and core temp is running about the same temps as on my previous setup and now probe is what seems to be reporting
    10C more. Long live asus!!! bah why cant they deliver a single steady mobo! If its not this..then its that....
    E6600 L629B
    Asus Striker Extreme testing. I hope DFI can make my dreams come true!
    CELL SHOCK PC6400
    Tuniq tower 120
    MSI 7900GTO
    OCZ 600W

  6. #6
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    579
    I can also confirm that CoreTemp usually reads LOWER than PC Probe on my P5W64, whereas on the P5WDH it was the opposite.

    Ibinco: Can you test your max FSB for me please?

  7. #7
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    178
    @Durzel, m8 ill try and see how far it takes me, only thing im worried aobut @ the moment since im on air are the temperatures. Ill see how far i can push my CPU. Do you want stability or just being able to load into windows?
    E6600 L629B
    Asus Striker Extreme testing. I hope DFI can make my dreams come true!
    CELL SHOCK PC6400
    Tuniq tower 120
    MSI 7900GTO
    OCZ 600W

  8. #8
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    579
    Well, don't do anything you're not comfortable doing

    I was basically trying to work out what the max FSB is on the board. Try lowering your multiplier using CrystalCPUID and putting the FSB up with Clockgen (ICS 954123 is the IC for the board I think).

    If you're not sure what any of this means don't worry.
    Last edited by Durzel; 09-14-2006 at 02:26 AM.

  9. #9
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    178
    @ durzel well im loading up now @ 440FSB all auto. My CPU is burning up though. I can super PI 1M stable.
    E6600 L629B
    Asus Striker Extreme testing. I hope DFI can make my dreams come true!
    CELL SHOCK PC6400
    Tuniq tower 120
    MSI 7900GTO
    OCZ 600W

  10. #10
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    579
    Was that 440 set in the BIOS? Memory 1:1?

  11. #11
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    465
    Quote Originally Posted by Durzel
    (ICS 954123 is the IC for the board I think).
    Easy way to tell is to look for a chip on the mobo that has the letters ICS printed on it (you'll probably find it around the northbridge). Also on the chip will be the number you need to select in clockgen. It should be the one you mentioned but you can use this method to check on other mobos

  12. #12
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    579
    Quote Originally Posted by [timko]
    Easy way to tell is to look for a chip on the mobo that has the letters ICS printed on it (you'll probably find it around the northbridge). Also on the chip will be the number you need to select in clockgen. It should be the one you mentioned but you can use this method to check on other mobos
    Thanks - that's useful to know I just assumed it was IC 954123 because thats what it is on the P5W-DH, plus it detected my clocks and let me use the sliders so I figured it must be right

  13. #13
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    178
    @Durzel

    yip im running 1:1
    E6600 L629B
    Asus Striker Extreme testing. I hope DFI can make my dreams come true!
    CELL SHOCK PC6400
    Tuniq tower 120
    MSI 7900GTO
    OCZ 600W

  14. #14
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    579
    Hmm interesting...

    So just for clarity... you set 440 FSB in the BIOS, 1:1 memory and all voltages on AUTO?

  15. #15
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    700
    The overvolting thing really sucks, my P5WDG2 WS Pro does the same thing and I hate it.

    From what I've read, the P5W DH might just be a better board for overclocking. It allows lower voltages and runs cooler (at least the CPU does)

    I'm tempted to try a P5W-DH

    What's ironic is that the P5W DH is the 1st board I bought but I never even opened it.

    I tried a DQ6, A Badaxe and now the P5WDG2 WS Pro!

    Antec P180 SILVER
    Asus P8P67 Deluxe Bios 1602
    Intel Core I7 2600K @ 4.8ghz 1.295V Manual 24/7
    Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme
    OCZ 700W PSU
    4X2GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600mhz
    Seagate 1TB Samsung 1TB (X3)
    MSI Radeon HD 5850
    WINDOWS 7 PRO X64

  16. #16
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    579
    P5W-DH is a great board I think, and the fact there seem to be so many BIOS coming out for it recently (there's even a downward multi BIOS now, but its a bit buggy apparently) shows that Asus regard it as their "main" consumer board.

    It just sucks that there's already two revisions of it out and - in the UK certainly - there doesn't seem to be a way of guaranteeing that you'll get the better version.

    Plus, getting over 400FSB seems to be a bit of a crapshoot.

    I had hoped that the P5W64 would guarantee me an easy 450+ FSB 1:1 but at the moment it's almost as bad as my original P5W-DH was. Early days though I guess.

    Only thing really going for it is the quad PCIe part - could add an Areca card later on if I wanted (so could you with the P5WDG2 WS Pro) and get insane RAID speeds.

  17. #17
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Philippines ^_^
    Posts
    1,618
    wow high temps you got there.. mm.. i think you should be much better using other heatsink.. just my 2 cents..

    btw nice clocks.. most cpu's cant reach 440 fsb on a 975x chips..
    Asus P5W64 WS Professional , DFI Infinity 965P-S (testing)
    X6800 , E6750 es
    Micron Fatbodies , Micron D9gkx oem, Crucial 8000, Crucial Tracer 8500 (incomming)
    Ati FireGL V5100, Elsa FireGL V3100
    water cooling setup (EK 775 cpu block, swiftech NB Block, Swiftech pump, BI dual pass dual 120mm)
    Silverstone OP650
    raptors, baracuda

  18. #18
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    579
    Quote Originally Posted by mykeos
    Nb is the same as on p5w dh deluxe.better cooling is what makes a diiference regarding FSB.
    If that were true, how is it that Hexus and AndreYang both posted reviews saying that they got 500FSB and 470FSB with no mods at all? Presumably "no mods" also means no changes to the cooling system (other than maybe changing TIM)

  19. #19
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    178
    Quote Originally Posted by Durzel
    Hmm interesting...

    So just for clarity... you set 440 FSB in the BIOS, 1:1 memory and all voltages on AUTO?
    yes m8 thats what im telling ya...had to raise the vcore for the CPU after a 1m of super pi my cpu was burnin.
    E6600 L629B
    Asus Striker Extreme testing. I hope DFI can make my dreams come true!
    CELL SHOCK PC6400
    Tuniq tower 120
    MSI 7900GTO
    OCZ 600W

  20. #20
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    579
    Ok I've made a bit of progress with this board, sortof...



    Setting memory to 3:2 meant I could ClockGen up to 460 before having problems (I know screenshot shows 450, but I got higher after it). Setting it to 470 locked the machine.

    This is with vDimm 2.1v, vMCH 1.7, everything else AUTO (except vCore but that's irrelevant I think?). Manual memory setting in BIOS, then everything other than the 4-4-4-12 changed to match SPD.

    Does this mean my G.Skill memory is not capable of running over ~410FSB 1:1? If so, how come I can boot into Windows and run Prime when its running 500Mhz? (not on 1:1)

  21. #21
    Hardware Junkie
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Okinawa, Japan
    Posts
    917
    Quote Originally Posted by Durzel
    Ok I've made a bit of progress with this board, sortof...



    Setting memory to 3:2 meant I could ClockGen up to 460 before having problems (I know screenshot shows 450, but I got higher after it). Setting it to 470 locked the machine.

    This is with vDimm 2.1v, vMCH 1.7, everything else AUTO (except vCore but that's irrelevant I think?). Manual memory setting in BIOS, then everything other than the 4-4-4-12 changed to match SPD.

    Does this mean my G.Skill memory is not capable of running over ~410FSB 1:1? If so, how come I can boot into Windows and run Prime when its running 500Mhz? (not on 1:1)
    Try upping the vdimm to at least 2.3v
    "You'll find happiness once you accept the inevitable or at least you won't be too pissed off" -- Me

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  22. #22
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    5,931
    yeah you can either up the vdimm a bit or loosen timings a bit.

  23. #23
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    579
    But this isn't at 1:1 like I said. If you look at the Clockgen screen you'll see that the memory is running at 337Mhz, well below its rated speed of 400.

    If I could get it to 450 1:1 I would be very happy.

  24. #24
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    481
    Quote Originally Posted by orion23
    The overvolting thing really sucks, my P5WDG2 WS Pro does the same thing and I hate it.

    From what I've read, the P5W DH might just be a better board for overclocking. It allows lower voltages and runs cooler (at least the CPU does)
    Isn't the above bolded text an oxymoron???

    I loved the overvolting feature of the P5WDG2 WS Pro, the only problem was that it seemed to undervolt when you set vCore any higher than 1.6v in BIOS. Albeit, that's using hardware monitor to measure not a DMM, but i think it's close to reality because I could get the same overclocks at 1.6v BIOS (1.64v reading - overvolt) as I could at 1.7v BIOS (1.64v reading - undervolt)

    What really sucks is it only allows 1.7vCore and 2.4vdimm
    Last edited by SLi_dog; 09-14-2006 at 05:53 AM.

  25. #25
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    579
    Quote Originally Posted by SLi_dog
    Isn't the above bolded text an oxymoron???

    I loved the overvolting feature of the P5WDG2 WS Pro, the only problem was that it seemed to undervolt when you set vCore any higher than 1.6v in BIOS. Albeit, that's using hardware monitor to measure not a DMM, but i think it's close to reality because I could get the same overclocks at 1.6v BIOS (1.64v reading - overvolt) as I could at 1.7v BIOS (1.64v reading - undervolt)

    What really sucks is it only allows 1.7vCore and 2.4vdimm
    I think he meant "higher voltages", but you're right.

    Also, do any of us know what vCore Conroes die at yet? Has anyone actually killed one? All I know is that they're something like 1.3v stock, less for ES chips... and people are cranking them up to 1.6v and 1.7v already. P4 Northwoods basically died very quickly above 1.85v regardless of cooling.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •