MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 25

Thread: Has any concensus been reached about the accuracy of "CoreTemp?"

Threaded View

  1. #21
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    83
    yes , i also think Coretemp its the best way to see temps :


    with Opteron 165 = 32c >>>>>>>>> X1800XT = 35c

    With Intel 920 D >>>>>>>>>> X1800XT = 44c

    with Conroe E6400 >>>>>>>>> X1800XT = 42c


    CPU + VGA >> watercooled .


    so the only reason i find to X1800XT its + 7c hot with Conroe than with opty 165 its because the water from CPU to VGA came Hot (+7c) in Conroe that with Opteron 165 , so :


    If i have 32c in opty 165 the conroe should be +7c hot = 32c + 7c = 39c


    My temps E6400 :

    Speedfan > 26c

    Bios >> 26c

    Core Temp >> Core1 = 41c || Core2 = 40c

    Everest >> Core1 = 41c || Core2 = 40c


    so CoreTemp and everest seams to be more accurate with my previous temps calculations (32c +7c = 39c)



    and other thing , now that the days here are colder my E6400 last night with speedfan reads 15c what i think its impossible ( Core Temp read 30c):









    and today :









    sory for my bad english


    regards
    Last edited by mascarilha; 08-25-2006 at 04:35 AM.

    Core2 DUO E6400@ 3500mhz @ 1.50v // Gigabyte DS3 // Connect3D X1800XT 512Mb @ 700/800 @ Stock voltage//2x1Gb TeamGroup DDR2 PC2-5300
    >>>>> (ALL Watercooled by Aquacomputer)<<<<

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •