now correct me if i am wrong here. but it looks liek it took the Conroe to run at 3.4 to run almost even, in 3dmark atleast, with the FX-60 @ 3.4
that sound about right ?

why does this seem not right ?

or does the FX just scale that good ? considering the bus and ram speed of the conroe wouldnt one want to believe that the conroe would be just kicking the crap out of the FX-60 ?