MMM
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 48

Thread: Woodcrest 3 Ghz aka Xeon 5160

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    56

    Woodcrest 3 Ghz aka Xeon 5160

    Here is my dual Woodcrest 3.0 Ghz , 4 GB FBdimm 667Mhz , Supermicro X7DAE mobo








    Let me know what benchmarks u wanna see
    Last edited by wtfdc; 06-23-2006 at 01:43 PM.

  2. #2
    the jedi master
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Manchester uk/Sunnyvale CA
    Posts
    3,884
    Ohh man choose somewhere else to host the files....some real ugly woman show up on the left of the pics when you click the links you posted...seems some not so ugly ones also..LOL...still i would look to another hoster
    Got a problem with your OCZ product....?
    Have a look over here
    Tony AKA BigToe


    Tuning PC's for speed...Run whats fast, not what you think is fast

  3. #3
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    56
    Quote Originally Posted by Tony
    Ohh man choose somewhere else to host the files....some real ugly woman show up on the left of the pics when you click the links you posted...seems some not so ugly ones also..LOL...still i would look to another hoster
    Any suggestion for a fast pic hoster ? Sorry I am new to this

  4. #4
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Houston Texas
    Posts
    247

  5. #5
    The Blue Dolphin
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    2,816
    Blue Dolphin Reviews & Guides

    Blue Reviews:
    Gigabyte G-Power PRO CPU cooler
    Vantec Nexstar 3.5" external HDD enclosure
    Gigabyte Poseidon 310 case


    Blue Guides:
    Fixing a GFX BIOS checksum yourself


    98% of the internet population has a Myspace. If you're part of the 2% that isn't an emo bastard, copy and paste this into your sig.

  6. #6
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    56
    Quote Originally Posted by SoulGG
    Thanks bro,

    Some more shots on the mobo and CPU



    Last edited by wtfdc; 06-23-2006 at 01:49 PM.

  7. #7
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Houston Texas
    Posts
    247
    Can you leave them at default size instead of letting it resize them?

  8. #8
    Xtreme CCIE
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    3,842
    Quote Originally Posted by wtfdc
    Here is my dual Woodcrest 3.0 Ghz , 4 GB FBdimm 667Mhz , Supermicro X7DAE mobo...

    Let me know what benchmarks u wanna see
    I'd like to see PCMark05 myself.

    On a slight tangent, I've been heavily considering getting a setup somewhat like that myself and am wondering if you can let me know what motherboards you looked at and why you chose that particular one? I'm still in the looking at my possibilities phase and just wondering what your experiences/suggestions were.

    Serra
    Dual CCIE (Route\Switch and Security) at your disposal. Have a Cisco-related or other network question? My PM box is always open.

    Xtreme Network:
    - Cisco 3560X-24P PoE Switch
    - Cisco ASA 5505 Firewall
    - Cisco 4402 Wireless LAN Controller
    - Cisco 3502i Access Point

  9. #9
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    56
    Quote Originally Posted by Serra
    I'd like to see PCMark05 myself.

    On a slight tangent, I've been heavily considering getting a setup somewhat like that myself and am wondering if you can let me know what motherboards you looked at and why you chose that particular one? I'm still in the looking at my possibilities phase and just wondering what your experiences/suggestions were.

    Serra
    Well, the Supermicro board is Greencreek chipset, it has a PCIe x16 for my Nvidia QuadroFX4400 , 1 PCIe x4 , 3 PCI-X 133Mhz, 1 PCI , 8 FBdimm Slots, Dual Intel Gigabit LOM with IOAT , Dual SCSI/SAS U320 , 2 SATA with Intel Matrix RAID

    Overall pretty stable looking workstation
    Last edited by wtfdc; 06-22-2006 at 06:20 PM.

  10. #10
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    56
    Quote Originally Posted by SoulGG
    Can you leave them at default size instead of letting it resize them?
    Here ya go



    LGA 771
    Last edited by wtfdc; 06-22-2006 at 09:51 PM.

  11. #11
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    632
    run some 3D benches, or do u have a good card? if not run a cinebench or a rosetta bench
    DFI LANPARTY UT nF4 Ultra-D [6/23 BIOS]
    AMD Opteron 148 [CAB2E 0546GPMW] [257x11.0 @ v1.500] & Zalman CNPS7000B-CU
    OCZ EL Platinum Rev. 2 2x512[207FSB @ 2-3-3-6 @ v2.80 1T]
    DFI Ultra-D [6/23 BIOS]
    eVGA 7800GT [470 / 1100]
    Western Digital Caviar SE 250GB Serial ATA
    Antec SmartPower 2.0 SP-500 ATX12V 500W Power Supply

  12. #12
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    56
    Quote Originally Posted by cMw
    run some 3D benches, or do u have a good card? if not run a cinebench or a rosetta bench
    Is a Nvidia Quadro FX4400 good enough card ?
    Can u send me a link for Rosetta Bench?
    Downloading Cinebench now

  13. #13
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    3,012
    i want to see what the beats pulls in pcmark 05! and if you had a gaming card some 3d benchies.
    CPU: Intel Core i7 3930K @ 4.5GHz
    Mobo: Asus Rampage IV Extreme
    RAM: 32GB (8x4GB) Patriot Viper EX @ 1866mhz
    GPU: EVGA GTX Titan (1087Boost/6700Mem)
    Physx: Evga GTX 560 2GB
    Sound: Creative XFI Titanium
    Case: Modded 700D
    PSU: Corsair 1200AX (Fully Sleeved)
    Storage: 2x120GB OCZ Vertex 3's in RAID 0 + WD 600GB V-Raptor + Seagate 1TB
    Cooling: XSPC Raystorm, 2x MCP 655's, FrozenQ Warp Drive, EX360+MCR240+EX120 Rad's

  14. #14
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    56
    Put in a power meter for this workstation :
    Idle : 200 watt , Running Cinebench : 210 watts

    A far cry from a Netburst based Xeon consuming 350+ watts

  15. #15
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Vancouver, Canada
    Posts
    3,858
    Cinebench with 4 cores loaded 100% is 210 watts?
    i5 750 4.20GHz @ NH-D14 | 8GB | P7P55DLE | 8800U | Indilinx SSD + Samsung F3 | HAF922 + CM750W
    Past: Q6600 @ 3.60 E6400 @ 3.60 | E6300 @ 3.40 | O165 @ 2.90 | X2 4400+ @ 2.80 | X2 3800+ @ 2.70 | VE 3200+ @ 2.80 | WI 3200+ @ 2.75 | WI 3000+ no IHS @ 2.72 | TBB 1700+ @ 2.60 | XP-M 2500+ @ 2.63 | NC 2800+ @ 2.40 | AB 1.60GHz @ 2.60
    Quote Originally Posted by CompGeek
    The US is the only country that doesn't use [nuclear weapons] to terrorize other countries. The US is based on Christian values, unlike any other country in the world. Granted we are straying from our Christian heritage, but we still have a freedom aimed diplomatic stance.

  16. #16
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    56
    Quote Originally Posted by IvanAndreevich
    Cinebench with 4 cores loaded 100% is 210 watts?
    Yes , 2 DC Woodcrest 3.0 Ghz , 4 GB FBDIMMs, 1 SATA 120 GB drive and 1 Supermicro mobo
    Last edited by wtfdc; 06-22-2006 at 08:37 PM.

  17. #17
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    18
    Hi wtfdc,

    congrats on this sweer-looking rig. One thing I've been waiting for is some form of comparison between Conroes and Woodcrests for different tasks (encoding, gaming, etc) because I haven't made up my mind yet as to which one i'll buy. I guess I will go with the Woodcrests only if the performance over the Conroe is enough to justify the difference in price (mobo, RAM, etc).

    So, is there any way you could bench some of the Conroe benches that have been posted on this forum so we can get an idea of the performance difference between the two?

    Thanks in advance.

  18. #18
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    56
    PCMark 05 :8028

    Last edited by wtfdc; 06-23-2006 at 02:06 PM.

  19. #19
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    56
    Cinebench 9.5 : 14 s



    Last edited by wtfdc; 06-22-2006 at 09:57 PM.

  20. #20
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    56
    Temp : 36 - 38 C


    Last edited by wtfdc; 06-22-2006 at 09:56 PM.

  21. #21
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    At work
    Posts
    1,369
    Interesting how the Cinebench performance of the Woodcrest system is identical to that of the Kentsfield...maybe the 266MHz FSB of Kentsfield isn't all the restriction people had feared.

    Of maybe Cinebench doesn't stress the bus sufficiently to saturate it.

    I'd be very interested to know what a dual Clovertown system pulls in Cinebench...
    Server: HP Proliant ML370 G6, 2x Xeon X5690, 144GB ECC Registered, 8x OCZ Vertex 3 MAX IOPS 240GB on LSi 9265-8i (RAID 0), 12x Seagate Constellation ES.2 3TB SAS on LSi 9280-24i4e (RAID 6) and dual 1200W redundant power supplies.
    Gamer: Intel Core i7 6950X@4.2GHz, Rampage Edition 10, 128GB (8x16GB) Corsair Dominator Platinum 2800MHz, 2x NVidia Titan X (Pascal), Corsair H110i, Vengeance C70 w/Corsair AX1500i, Intel P3700 2TB (boot), Samsung SM961 1TB (Games), 2x Samsung PM1725 6.4TB (11.64TB usable) Windows Software RAID 0 (local storage).
    Beater: Xeon E5-1680 V3, NCase M1, ASRock X99-iTX/ac, 2x32GB Crucial 2400MHz RDIMMs, eVGA Titan X (Maxwell), Samsung 950 Pro 512GB, Corsair SF600, Asetek 92mm AIO water cooler.
    Server/workstation: 2x Xeon E5-2687W V2, Asus Z9PE-D8, 256GB 1866MHz Samsung LRDIMMs (8x32GB), eVGA Titan X (Maxwell), 2x Intel S3610 1.6TB SSD, Corsair AX1500i, Chenbro SR10769, Intel P3700 2TB.

    Thanks for the help (or lack thereof) in resolving my P3700 issue, FUGGER...

  22. #22
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    895
    looks Intel wasnt full of it when they said much lower power consumption than AMD for sever task. Then again intel asked amd exactly how they would prefer they benchmark the woodcrest power consumption.

  23. #23
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,730
    Quote Originally Posted by lutjens

    I'd be very interested to know what a dual Clovertown system pulls in Cinebench...
    2x Cloverton 2GHz scores 1723 ( 362/core , scaling 4.76x ) while an Opteron 8x854 ( 8x2.8GHz ) pulls 2154 ( 448/core scaling 4.8 ).

    Cinebench sucks in scaling past 4 threads.A 16 core Opteron barely gets 2500.

  24. #24
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,730
    Please run Stream benchmark , it tests sustainable memory bandwidth .

    You can download it link for exe or compile it yourself source code

    If you know how to compile Fortran source code you can also try Stream 2

    Link for site http://www.cs.virginia.edu/stream/

    You enter command promt and type stream freq and iterations.
    Last edited by savantu; 06-22-2006 at 11:46 PM.

  25. #25
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Herbert's House in Family Guy
    Posts
    2,381
    first how did u get Xein 5160?? links??

    2nd, 3d mark 01 to 06, pc mark ,sis sandra, and some gaems of ur choice

    thank u
    E6600 @ 3.6
    IN9 32x MAX
    EVGA 8800Ultra
    750W

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •