A nice comparison, good work Coolaler.
His FX-60 PI time is weird though, My Venice @ 2.85GHz is faster.
i7-960@4.2GHz/Rampage III Gene/3GB KHX14400/HD5670
Ddr2 ??
nice work
Mojo
Family
Biostar TP55 XE - Core i7 860(ES) @ 4.2ghz - CNPS10X Extreme - G.SKILL 1600 - Galaxy GTX275 - Velociraptor 300GB x 2 - Zippy TypeR 600w
Criminal
Biostar Tpower X58A - 920~Gulf - G.SKILL2000CL8 - GTX580 - Intel 520 120GB - Antec HCP 1200w
Biostar TP67XE/TZ77XE4 2500k~3770K - G.SKILL 2800 - GTX480 - OCZ Vertex2 50GB - Corsair AX1200
Biostar Tpower X79 i7 3820 ~ E5 2680 - G.SKILL 2400C11 - GTX560Ti - Intel 520 120GB - AX1200i
Kids
P4GD1 - Pentium M 780 - XMS Xpert400 - GTX460 - Raptor 36GB - Aopen 560w
The Super PI time seems right to me, if you check this thread by OPP where he is testing a FX62. You can see he is getting 25.203s @ 3.25GHz
Nice compare Coolaler
intel Core 2 Duo E6600 @ 8x400MHz
Asus P5E X38 bios 1201
Corsair TWIN2X2048-6400 x2 4GB in total
eVGA Geforece 9800GTX+ || Creative Audigy 2 ZS
Adaptec AAR1430SA 4port Raid card
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 160GB 8MB SATA2 x2 (RAID0, OS drive) on Adaptec
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 250GB 8MB SATA2 x2
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB 32MB SATA2
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1000GB 32MB SATA2
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1500GB 32MB SATA2 x4
Coolermaster CM 690 || Corsair CMPSU-520HX
Windows 7 Ultimate RTM x64
Philips 200WB7ES 20" WS 1680x1050
MacBook Pro 15" June 2009
iPhone 3GS 16GB
So are the 3DMark05 and 06 scores showing that both systems are GPU bound? Is that 7900 GTX SLI or just one card?
I can't understand how Conroe would be faster in 3DMark01 and 03, yet about the same in 05 and 06....
Originally Posted by Durzel
So are the 3DMark05 and 06 scores showing that both systems are GPU bound? Is that 7900 GTX SLI or just one card?
I can't understand how Conroe would be faster in 3DMark01 and 03, yet about the same in 05 and 06....
Cause 3dmark 05 and 06 are primarily GPU based tests, 01 is alot of memory speed / timings and CPU overclock. Overclocking a CPU in 05 and 06 doesnt affect the overall score more than a few points.
i7-2600k @ 4.8Ghz 1.38v L044A892
ASUS P8P67 LGA
16GB G.Skill Rip Jaws DDR3 1600Mhz Memory
1/2" ID Masterkleer, Swiftech MCP-655, Thermochill PA120.3 Rad, XSPC Rasa, MCW-60
Cooler Master UCP 1100 Watt PSU
GTX 680 1300/7000
Lian Li PC V-2000
Fair compare? A $1000 CPU overclocked against a ~$600 CPU at stock speed?
//* AMDboy troll *//
But it wasn't on AM2 with DDR2 memory.. Intel is cheating.. It's unfair...
______
Good job Coolaler.. Can't wait to get mine (23 July is too far...)
Is it under clocked to 2.4 in some of the tests?
What the world needs is more geniuses with humility, there are so few of us left.
DS3 | E6400 - 3.2GHz | OCZ PLat. PC6400 | 6800GT | Zippy 460W
I thought fx-62 would only be am2. fx-60 would be both.
Current 24/7 settings
Delidded L628B e6400@ 3.6ghz 1.38v
3.9ghz 1.56v dual prime, 4ghz dual 32m pi stable on water and P5B Deluxe
Patriot 667 LLK @ 970 mhz 4-4-4-4 2.3v
x1900xt 690/780
Well Intel finally stepped up to bat with Conroe/Mernom. If its that good @ stock, what happens with the cascade setups and some serious clockage? I haven't bought Intel since my P3-800 that did 1.2ghz but this is gonna be total ownage and I will be switching this winter.
Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 4ghz
2GB PC2-6400 @ 445/890 4, 4, 4, 12
ATI HD4850 @ stock
Gigabyte P35-DS3L
El Cheapo 500w PSU with dual 12v rails
16X DVD+/- R/W
Why is the FSB at 1.2 GHz as opposed to 1066 MHz? And what's up with it being at 2.4 GHz
How overclockable are the conroe chips? Might be good to compare a maxxed out conroe vs a maxxed out FX-62
Hahaha...LMAO
This is the joke of the day...
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...=101190&page=6
dude you missed a few threads
Q6600 | P35 DQ6 | 4x1GB Ballistix8500 | 8800GT 512 | PC P & P 750w | WC Mcp655, D-tek Fuzion, Maze 4, Bip3 |
E6600 | Abit AB9 QuadGT | 3x1GB D9GMH | 7900GTO | Silverstone Zeus 850W | Aircooled |
E2160 | Giga 965 Ds3 | 3x1GB D9HNL | 7600GS Silent |Seasonic s12 600w | Aircooled |
3.7 to 3.9GHz on AIR is it good?.....
INTEL PWA FOR EVER
Dr. Who my arss...
.........
i think he was answering this question :you mean 2.7
>> "How overclockable are the conroe chips?"
Cause X2 seem to be a bit better at multithreads - and the shared cache is also an issue when it comes to single core versus dualcore percentage performance increase..So are the 3DMark05 and 06 scores showing that both systems are GPU bound? Is that 7900 GTX SLI or just one card?
I can't understand how Conroe would be faster in 3DMark01 and 03, yet about the same in 05 and 06....
Competition ranking;
2005; Netbyte, Karise/Denmark #1 @ PiFast
2008; AOCM II, Minfeld/Germany #2 @ 01SE/AM3/8M (w. Oliver)
2009; AMD-OC, Viborg/Denmark #2 @ max freq Gigabyte TweaKING, Paris/France #4 @ 32M/01SE (w. Vanovich)
2010: Gigabyte P55, Hamburg/Germany #6 @ wprime 1024/SPI 1M (w. THC) AOCM III, Minfeld/Germany #6 @ 01SE/AM3/1M/8M (w. NeoForce)
Spectating;
2010; GOOC 2010 Many thanks to Gigabyte!
superpi does seem slow
http://forums.extremeoverclocking.co...3&d=1131635799
my 4400+ at 2.94 ghz is low 28s
i7 6700K @4.8 ghz
XSPC RayStorm (very nice block)
Z170 Sabertooh ,, 32GB- Gskill (15-15-15-36 @3600 mhz) 1:1
XFX-7970 with Swiftech Komodo nickel block
Water Cooling - MO-RA3 Pro with 4 Silverstone 180mm @ 700 rpm, Twin Vario mcp-655 pumps
Samsung 850-1TB SSD,, OCZ ZX-1250W (powerfull and silent)
Crossfire 30" decent monitor for IPS too bad SED tech died
Docsis2.0
Docsis3.0
-- People who reject the idea that "government has a responsibility to reduce income inequality" give an average of four times more than people who accept that proposition.
No I mean 3.7 - 3.9GHz ON AIR as for the Conroe CPU......AMD about 3 - 3.15GHz....you mean 2.7
INTEL PWA FOR EVER
Dr. Who my arss...
.........
Because the FX62 is at 3GHz and the Conroe at 2.67GHz.... 01 and 03 benefit more from the efficient architecture. Conroe needs to be a bit higher before overtaking.......So are the 3DMark05 and 06 scores showing that both systems are GPU bound? Is that 7900 GTX SLI or just one card?
I can't understand how Conroe would be faster in 3DMark01 and 03, yet about the same in 05 and 06....
AMD 3800 X2, DFI NF4 SLI-DR, 2 Leadtek 6800GT, OCZ 3200 Platinum LE, OCZ 600.
No I mean 3.7 - 3.9GHz ON AIR as for the Conroe CPU......AMD about 3 - 3.15GHz....
i saw the 6700 at 3.7 and the 6800 at 3.8 who did the 3.9 ??
i7 6700K @4.8 ghz
XSPC RayStorm (very nice block)
Z170 Sabertooh ,, 32GB- Gskill (15-15-15-36 @3600 mhz) 1:1
XFX-7970 with Swiftech Komodo nickel block
Water Cooling - MO-RA3 Pro with 4 Silverstone 180mm @ 700 rpm, Twin Vario mcp-655 pumps
Samsung 850-1TB SSD,, OCZ ZX-1250W (powerfull and silent)
Crossfire 30" decent monitor for IPS too bad SED tech died
-- People who reject the idea that "government has a responsibility to reduce income inequality" give an average of four times more than people who accept that proposition.
slaughter
1. slaugh.ter \'slo.t-*r\ n [ME, of Scand origin; akin to ON sla-tra to
slaughter; akin to OE s]leaht slaughter, sle-an to slay - more at SLAY 1:
the act of killing; specif : the butchering of livestock for mar ket 2:
destruction of human lives in battle : CARNAGE
2. slaughter \-*r-*r\ vt 1: to kill (animals) for food : BUTCHER 2a: to
kill in a bloody or violent manner : SLAY 2b: to kill in large numbers :
MASSACRE - slaugh.ter.er n
rape
NOUN: 1. The crime of forcing another person to submit to silicon acts, especially silicon intercourse. 2. The act of seizing and carrying off by force; abduction. 3. Abusive or improper treatment; violation: a rape of justice.
TRANSITIVE VERB: Inflected forms: raped, rap·ing, rapes
1. To force (another person) to submit to silicon acts, especially silicon intercourse; commit rape on. 2. To seize and carry off by force. 3. To plunder or pillage.
ETYMOLOGY: Middle English, from rapen, to rape, from Old French raper, to abduct, from Latin rapere, to seize. See rep- in Appendix I.
OTHER FORMS: raper —NOUN
AMD will be ahead once 65nm A64 is launched, but... I actually think penryn will hit stores VERY close to AMD 65nm,... And 65nm vs. 45nm, back to the current stage.yeah and what's not normal about this?
i hope you see the difference between 65nm tech and 90nm tech
intel would not reach it without going 65nm...
amd wil launch 3.4/3.ghz boxed air cooled cpu soon, why? 65nm
being realistic as a fan doesn't hurt
Competition ranking;
2005; Netbyte, Karise/Denmark #1 @ PiFast
2008; AOCM II, Minfeld/Germany #2 @ 01SE/AM3/8M (w. Oliver)
2009; AMD-OC, Viborg/Denmark #2 @ max freq Gigabyte TweaKING, Paris/France #4 @ 32M/01SE (w. Vanovich)
2010: Gigabyte P55, Hamburg/Germany #6 @ wprime 1024/SPI 1M (w. THC) AOCM III, Minfeld/Germany #6 @ 01SE/AM3/1M/8M (w. NeoForce)
Spectating;
2010; GOOC 2010 Many thanks to Gigabyte!
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks