Conroe E6700 3.7G@XP 64bit OS

[coolaler]

Conroe E6700 3.7G@XP 64bit OS
Platform
M/B ：MSI 975X Platinum 2.b
MEM ：Corsair DDRII 8000UL 512x2 Dual Channel
HDD ：Maxtor 300g SATAII 16Mb Cache
VGA CARD ：NV MSI 7900GTX
POWER: Enhance 650W
OS ：WIN XP64 SP1 & WIN XP32 pro SP2
CPU COOLER：Tower 120
CPU ：Intel Core 2 Duo Conroe's family E6700

Win XP64@cinebench 64



compare with Win XP32@Cinebench 2003



Win XP64@Cinebench 64
1CPU 759pts
XCPU 1401pts
single CPU 34.7s
mulitiple CPU18.8s


Win XP32@Cinebench 2003
1CPU 642pts
XCPU 1190pts
single CPU 41.0s
mulitiple CPU22.1s


Win XP64@3DMark01



compare with Win XP32@3DMark01



Win XP64@Superpi1M & CPUmark99



compare with Win XP32



Win XP 64@sisoft 2007-CPU Dhr ALU+Whe iSSE3



compare with Win XP32@sisoft



Win XP 64@sisoft 2007-CPU Int iSSE2+ Flot iSSE4



compare with Win XP32@sisoft



Win XP 64@sisoft 2007 Ram bandwidth



compare with Win XP32@sisoft



Win XP 64@sisoft 2007 Memery Latency random



compare with Win XP32@sisoft



Win XP 64@sisoft 2007 Memery Latency Linear



compare with Win XP32@sisoft



Win XP 64@sisoft 2007 L2 Cache



compare with Win XP32@sisoft

[M.Beier]

Nice, but sad it doesnt benefit from 64bit
This might give A64 AM2 a chance... Hmm..

[coolaler]

Win XP64@Performance 3.0 test



compare with Win XP32@Performance 3.0 test

[Vincentvega18]

Nice tests, so cinebench is the only program tested that improves on a 64bit os, i assume thats because its the 64bit program?

[ZX7891]

damn 64 bit blows

[dogsx2]

64 bit was the reason I jumped on a 754 AMD when they first came out. Almost three years later and 64 bit still hasn't the drivers it should and is not much help.

[vapb400]

Nice, but sad it doesnt benefit from 64bit
This might give A64 AM2 a chance... Hmm..

its more of the suckiness of xp64 and current 64 bit coding.

[Banko]

I just hope I wasn't the only one that saw the 200k CPU MultiMedia scores...

[vapb400]

I just hope I wasn't the only one that saw the 200k CPU MultiMedia scores...

O M F G

[coolaler]

Win XP64@Superpi32M



compare with Win XP32(sever 2003)

[vapb400]

YAY thanks for the xp64/2003 comparo

LOL you must spend SOOOOO much time in MSPaint coolaler

thanks alot man!

[THX1138]

That answers a few questions I had. Thanks for you time Coolaler

[end3rkid]

YAY thanks for the xp64/2003 comparo

LOL you must spend SOOOOO much time in MSPaint coolaler

thanks alot man!

If he does, he should try WinSnap

[Getttosmurf]

I just hope I wasn't the only one that saw the 200k CPU MultiMedia scores...

Daymn read it but didnt even react , nice score there
Really hope vista x64 will give atleast som gain from x32

[Hystrix^]

Is that with a single 7900GTX ?

[krampak]

Thanks for your time coolaler

Winrar or 7-zip would be also apreciated !

[coolaler]

Thanks for your time coolaler

Winrar or 7-zip would be also apreciated !

ok,let us getting X6800 ,maybe tomorow

[TarTheDark]

Congrats Coolaler, u r the man!

One question: what's with the 2x4MB L3 cache in the Sandra screenies?

[Cranox]

Thx for the 32 vs 64bit compare m8 !

[SoF]

wow that are maaaany screenies - and damn I enjoyed them
very good comparison coolaler

[Konflikt]

How do you got this cpu?

[IFB04]

-post removed for flamebaiting.

[RimRam]

Nice results, thanks for sharing.
But for some reason the numbers dont ad up.
The christalcpu show 147% overclock of 2.66ghz that equals to 3.91ghz.
why 3.7ghz then?
Also howcome christal cpu shows merom but cpuz show as conroe?
2 different cpu's?

[LiQU!D]

But for some reason the numbers dont ad up.

They do, check what the program thinks the original clock speed is.

The christalcpu show 147% overclock of 2.66ghz that equals to 3.91ghz.

Actually the overclock is by 147%, and not 147% of the original(what the program thinks is the original) clock speed. Thus, 1.47 x 1.5 = 2.205, 2.205 + 1.5 = 3.705GHz.

[afireinside]

-quote removed.


coolaler thanks for the comparison! Disappointing though. Was hoping x64 would be a bit faster for pi as it is on A64. This is much slower