MMM
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 71

Thread: what is holding Conroe and Merom back?

  1. #1
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    USA /okla
    Posts
    2,103

    what is holding Conroe and Merom back?

    So far both CPUs seem to be kicking tail.

    but why are OCs so low ???


    3.2 on air is great but why is it taking DI and LN2 to reach 3.3-3.6 ghz???


    whats holding back these CPUs ???
    voltage ???
    FSB wall ??
    poor mobo oc features??
    low Multi ??


    Yes, they are fast but an AMD can hit 4ghz with a coldbug shouldn't the Conroe hit 4-5 ghz without problems due to being based on a colder moble design & no IMC.


    3.2ghz =air , 3.27ghz= water , 3.3ghz= Dry ice sure seems like a wall and an aburpt one too.
    i7 6700K @4.8 ghz
    XSPC RayStorm (very nice block)
    Z170 Sabertooh ,, 32GB- Gskill (15-15-15-36 @3600 mhz) 1:1
    XFX-7970 with Swiftech Komodo nickel block
    Water Cooling - MO-RA3 Pro with 4 Silverstone 180mm @ 700 rpm, Twin Vario mcp-655 pumps
    Samsung 850-1TB SSD,, OCZ ZX-1250W (powerfull and silent)
    Crossfire 30" decent monitor for IPS too bad SED tech died

    Docsis2.0 Docsis3.0

    -- People who reject the idea that "government has a responsibility to reduce income inequality" give an average of four times more than people who accept that proposition.

  2. #2
    YouTube Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Klaatu barada nikto
    Posts
    17,574
    It is because of the trade off in the design between Speed and IPC
    Fast computers breed slow, lazy programmers
    The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost simplicity. It is a price which the very rich find most hard to pay.
    http://www.lighterra.com/papers/modernmicroprocessors/
    Modern Ram, makes an old overclocker miss BH-5 and the fun it was

  3. #3
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    518
    For atleast the Cornoe, their have not been really any good mobos which alow for nice OC or vcore options etc. Like coolaler oced that conroe on stock volts. 2.13 to 3.2 Ghz on stock Vcore, if thats not a good OC than I dont know what is...
    ***Main System ***
    Intel Core 2 Duo E6400 2.13 Ghz @ 3.6 Ghz
    Abit IP35-E
    4GB DDR2 RAM
    XFX HD 5770
    3x 120 GB HD
    2x 160 GB HD
    Antec Trueblue 2.0 480 Watt

  4. #4
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Croatia
    Posts
    2,542
    maybe it would go higher IF this revision of the MBs with 975x had voltage control... (which is a sad thing if you come to think of)
    Then it would go over the 1600 FSB which is the limit of 975x if I remember correctly reading that.
    Higher multies could probably help, I'm sure we will see that verified soon.

    My hopes are that the Conroe specific 965 chipsets, will have slightly newer and higher fsb clock, so that we wont need a high multi or XE to get a over 60% overclock
    ________
    Tiny tits
    Last edited by XS Janus; 05-12-2011 at 05:35 PM.

  5. #5
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    286
    I hope we'll see some good mobos
    based on universal tact generator chip (maybe it can increase max FBS due to better sync. e c.t.),
    BTW I suppose most of 965 mb will use this as well as new 975 (like DFI...)

  6. #6
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,472
    You are kidding right?

    The motherboard selection is very limited.

    The CPU's are engineering samples

    We havent even seen conroe EE ES yet


    you will see 4ghz intel conroe with 1500mhz fsb. Just wait until they launch some products. Plus, look at how well they scale in terms of performance as you raise the freq. They are very well designed chips.


    Consider everything you see now just a PREVIEW of what is to come. I dont know how you can compare how two totally different CPU's. Its like saying, Intel 9xx series can scale to 7ghz under ln2, why cant current conroe?

    Plus, look at motherboards for 9xx and amd skt 939. Very mature platforms.


    Conroe right now is just getting warmed up


    Quote Originally Posted by iboomalot
    So far both CPUs seem to be kicking tail.

    but why are OCs so low ???


    3.2 on air is great but why is it taking DI and LN2 to reach 3.3-3.6 ghz???


    whats holding back these CPUs ???
    voltage ???
    FSB wall ??
    poor mobo oc features??
    low Multi ??


    Yes, they are fast but an AMD can hit 4ghz with a coldbug shouldn't the Conroe hit 4-5 ghz without problems due to being based on a colder moble design & no IMC.


    3.2ghz =air , 3.27ghz= water , 3.3ghz= Dry ice sure seems like a wall and an aburpt one too.
    CPU: Intel CORE 2 Duo E6550 @ 3.6GHz w/ 1.29vcore (517*7)
    Motherboard:
    Gigabyte P35-DQ6
    Memory:
    Crucial 8500's
    Video:
    Nvidia 8800GTX
    PSU:
    Zippy 700W (fan modded of course)

  7. #7
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Brooklyn, New York
    Posts
    1,990
    Quote Originally Posted by irev210
    You are kidding right?

    The motherboard selection is very limited.

    The CPU's are engineering samples

    We havent even seen conroe EE ES yet


    you will see 4ghz intel conroe with 1500mhz fsb. Just wait until they launch some products. Plus, look at how well they scale in terms of performance as you raise the freq. They are very well designed chips.


    Consider everything you see now just a PREVIEW of what is to come. I dont know how you can compare how two totally different CPU's. Its like saying, Intel 9xx series can scale to 7ghz under ln2, why cant current conroe?

    Plus, look at motherboards for 9xx and amd skt 939. Very mature platforms.


    Conroe right now is just getting warmed up
    QFT. These are ES mobos with NO voltage options. Honestly, read the threads where coolaler posts his results, he said a million times that he cannot change the voltage from stock. The only Merom mobo has an FSB wall, what do you expect?
    Heatware: 50-0-0
    Quote Originally Posted by Charile
    I believe that GWB, who may NOT be the best overclocking CPU in the tray...
    Quote Originally Posted by -thc-(cZ) View Post
    oh c'mon, maxxx, kick that cat of that monitor and have it poop for you

  8. #8
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    115
    i didnt know 4ghz amd chips were so common.

  9. #9
    Skulltrail Addict - XIP
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    France
    Posts
    910
    for conroe, it's mainly due to the lack of good m/bs, we only saw some results on Intel BadAxe an Msi 975X, none of them is known for its xtrem o/c ability

    for merom, we already have 3.6+ cpus, and 14s Pi, with a 2.16G pre-release cpu, I don't find that so bad :d

  10. #10
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    132
    Quote Originally Posted by ProphetX
    i didnt know 4ghz amd chips were so common.
    Sure ill go buy FX60 and clock it to 4Ghz air

    I have only seen one AMD @ 4Ghz I think with a three stage cascade system.

    Conroe is being tested way before release and is allready alot faster to whats out. Then new steppings will also come out too

    These motherboards touch slightly on OC options. It doesnt even have Vcore settings

  11. #11
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    San Diego, California
    Posts
    3,166
    Quote Originally Posted by ORCBEAST
    Sure ill go buy FX60 and clock it to 4Ghz air

    I have only seen one AMD @ 4Ghz I think with a three stage cascade system.

    Conroe is being tested way before release and is allready alot faster to whats out. Then new steppings will also come out too

    These motherboards touch slightly on OC options. It doesnt even have Vcore settings
    A few AMDs made it to 4 Ghz but they're all FX57s and Opty 154
    Intel Rig
    2500K @ 4.8 Ghz 1.304v | ASRock Z68 Extreme3 Gen3| 2x4Gb Ripjaws DDR3-2133 | Radeon 7970 @ 1250/1800 | Corsair HX850 PSU
    Custom Water of course

  12. #12
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    132
    Quote Originally Posted by Absolute_0
    A few AMDs made it to 4 Ghz but they're all FX57s and Opty 154
    Oh i was just making a point

    The hardware you need to be able to do it and along with all the mods. Even if someone says dry ice,ln2 or what ever. Thats not 24/7.

  13. #13
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Broomfield, CO
    Posts
    3,882
    A lot of people have hit right on the mark. Conroe is extremely fast and scales incredible well. My 2.13Ghz ES CPU has no problems overclocking to about 2.9Ghz on stock volts. The 2.4Ghz ES Conroe CPUs will go to about 3.2 on stock volts. I'm sure we'll see 3.4 to 3.5Ghz with the B0 stepping 2.66Ghz Conroe ES processors....

    The extra cooling above and beyond air cooling is simply allowing for slightly better silicon efficiency and is buying so very little when it comes to overclocking right now....this is actually GOOD news. It means that the CPU doesn't necessarily need extremely cold temperatures to overclocking well.

    What we need right now is the ability to crank about 1.5-1.6v through these CPUs. Extreme cooling on a CPU at this voltage will surely skyrocket the speeds into the 4.5Ghz+ range.

    I still stand by my original announcement, Conroe WILL get to 4Ghz on aircooling.

    FCG

  14. #14
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    1,756
    Quote Originally Posted by freecableguy
    What we need right now is the ability to crank about 1.5-1.6v through these CPUs. Extreme cooling on a CPU at this voltage will surely skyrocket the speeds into the 4.5Ghz+ range.

    I still stand by my original announcement, Conroe WILL get to 4Ghz on aircooling.

    FCG

    Coolaler did it and was still far from 4Ghz

    Quote Originally Posted by coolaler
    Vcore:1.47~1.5V
    The results are impressive still.

  15. #15
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Broomfield, CO
    Posts
    3,882
    Quote Originally Posted by LowRun
    Coolaler did it on LN2 and was still far from 4Ghz



    The results are impressive still.
    holy #^*$%, did you not read a word I typed? Wait for the XE.

  16. #16
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    1,756
    Quote Originally Posted by freecableguy
    holy #^*$%, did you not read a word I typed? Wait for the XE.
    I'm not pretending anything but seeing that was on LN2 too, please explain why there will be such a difference in OC. Yours was supposed to do 4Ghz on air, any clue why it didn't as of yet?

  17. #17
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    286
    Quote Originally Posted by freecableguy
    I still stand by my original announcement, Conroe WILL get to 4Ghz on aircooling.
    FCG
    FCG, I hope you have Conroe XE ES chip under NDA
    to be sure it will do 4Ghz on air.

    To be honest, 200% max overclock with TOP 965 Presler makes
    4Ghz Conroe a bit closer to reality in my mind...... But Who knows how simple Conroe (not best cores like XE) will go?

    AnyWay

  18. #18
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    East Coast USA
    Posts
    768
    Lowrun can you not read. these are early es samples, they will only get better.

  19. #19
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Brooklyn, New York
    Posts
    1,990
    Quote Originally Posted by LowRun
    Coolaler did it and was still far from 4Ghz



    The results are impressive still.
    That was on merom NOT conroe. The mobo had an fsb wall. Conroe remained at stock volts for coolalers entire test.
    Heatware: 50-0-0
    Quote Originally Posted by Charile
    I believe that GWB, who may NOT be the best overclocking CPU in the tray...
    Quote Originally Posted by -thc-(cZ) View Post
    oh c'mon, maxxx, kick that cat of that monitor and have it poop for you

  20. #20
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    519
    Quote Originally Posted by LowRun
    I'm not pretending anything but seeing that was on LN2 too, please explain why there will be such a difference in OC. Yours was supposed to do 4Ghz on air, any clue why it didn't as of yet?
    Coolaler had a Merom - Core mobile (Yonah and now Merom) cpus have a FSB wall, that's why it can't go further.

  21. #21
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    132
    Quote Originally Posted by LowRun
    I'm not pretending anything but seeing that was on LN2 too, please explain why there will be such a difference in OC. Yours was supposed to do 4Ghz on air, any clue why it didn't as of yet?
    It doesnt matter what cooling u have if u cant give VCORE = voltage.

    Lets say my cpu runs at 30c and i cannot up the vcore, moving to LN2 or any other cooling wont improve my OC because you cannot give extra volts.

    Coolaler could have gone higher with AIR. He never said his chip was running 90c and its holding him back.

    Remember Intel will be releasing 3.3Ghz and to go to 4Ghz would be easy. Thats my opinion and we will just have to wait and see.

  22. #22
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    San Diego, California
    Posts
    3,166
    Quote Originally Posted by LowRun
    I'm not pretending anything but seeing that was on LN2 too, please explain why there will be such a difference in OC. Yours was supposed to do 4Ghz on air, any clue why it didn't as of yet?
    Seriously read FCG's post. It's hard to clock to 4 Ghz when you're on a beta board with no voltage control

    As FCG said the Conroes here are an early revision and the upcoming conroes will be a newer revision good for more Mhz

    Yep Orcbeast, 3.33 Ghz Intel model. Which means it will run there on the stock aircooling. We have some definite headroom with Conroe.
    Intel Rig
    2500K @ 4.8 Ghz 1.304v | ASRock Z68 Extreme3 Gen3| 2x4Gb Ripjaws DDR3-2133 | Radeon 7970 @ 1250/1800 | Corsair HX850 PSU
    Custom Water of course

  23. #23
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Canada, BC
    Posts
    539
    Wait for new MB to come out... Im sure will get some good ASUS and DFI boards soon. Then we'll see some better OCs. I think its just the boards that limit the OC.

    Id wait for a few months when everyone will get the conroe then well start getting somethin...

    Its just waitin now

  24. #24
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    1,756
    Quote Originally Posted by cronic
    Lowrun can you not read. these are early es samples, they will only get better.
    I can read for what i know, that's how i learned from FCC that his ES was supposed to do 4Ghz on air, does it mean that at some point his proc will turn into something else on his own?

    I like other people am surprised how well conroe/merom OC on stock volts but seem to not scale that much with volts and i know this is all preliminary, just curious here.

  25. #25
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Stockholm, Sweden
    Posts
    265
    I'm with FCG, new steppings should help alot.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •