Results 1 to 25 of 34

Thread: New Beetle's Celeron M420 SPi Results

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Shanghai, P.R.China
    Posts
    1,648
    Quote Originally Posted by PRTeamJapan
    Haven't you ever wondered why Tyrou's Pi & perhaps yours were so slow?
    New Beetle is the King of the Kings with respect to Pi.
    Besides, we, @Team Japan, posted how we run Pi here in XS so many times...

    A bit of surprise to see such comments from XIP like you

    FYI, 1M Ranking, 8M Ranking, 32M Ranking

    Cheers

    fredyama
    mine T2400 @ 282_11 pi_32m=17min15sec, meanwhile pi_1m=19.08sec


    I tried 284_11 pi_1m=18.9sec, meanwhile pi_32m may be arround 16min55~17min05

    so... how can a CM420 pi_1m = 18.5sec runs pi_32m=15min34sec?
    that's what i'm wondering.

    i'm just a little bird and wanna to figure out why .
    system optimize ?
    win2003 helps ?
    close some threads in taskmanager ?
    set pi running with real-time prio ?
    set affinity ?
    or someother ways ?

    hope to learn
    Uni Hardware:
    http://www.unihw.com

    Team China

  2. #2
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    393
    Quote Originally Posted by VictorWang
    so... how can a CM420 pi_1m = 18.5sec runs pi_32m=15min34sec?
    that's what i'm wondering.

    i'm just a little bird and wanna to figure out why .
    system optimize ?
    win2003 helps ?
    close some threads in taskmanager ?
    set pi running with real-time prio ?
    set affinity ?
    or someother ways ?

    hope to learn
    I have had the same thought in my mind!

    Is celeron M indeed faster than yohan core duo?!

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •