nice memory benches. about what i found to be true as well, though i looked at 333x9 at 1:1 with it enabled and 300x10 with it disabled, about the same
![Quote](images/misc/quote_icon.png)
Originally Posted by
Tony
Its actually good if you are using the 250 ratio as it seems to drop you down a little below the 250 but above the 233. Benching a CPU at 200 to 240fsb is usually a lot easier on the CPU but you usually lose ram speed, this may give you an option to gain some back with an added upclock ratio.
yeah, i can see that now... though inbetween 250 and 233, shouldn't it be possible to just use 233 and use a 1/2 multi lower than what was set? while this won't apply to every case, it's a possibility.
however, i just did some math.. unless the ratios aren't what they should be (5:4 and 7:6 for 250 and 233), then there is never a time when there's more than 1 between memory divider set by the two respective ratios from a range of multipliers between 6x and 15x, including the 1/2 multi's. ![Confused](http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/images/smilies/confused.gif)
the difference..
disabled
Code:
4/5 6/7 12/13 1
15 12 13 14 15
14.5 12 13 14 15
14 12 12 13 14
13.5 11 12 13 14
13 11 12 12 13
12.5 10 11 12 13
12 10 11 12 12
11.5 10 10 11 12
11 9 10 11 11
10.5 9 9 10 11
10 8 9 10 10
9.5 8 9 9 10
9 8 8 9 9
8.5 7 8 8 9
8 7 7 8 8
7.5 6 7 7 8
7 6 6 7 7
6.5 6 6 6 7
6 5 6 6 6
enabled
Code:
4/5 6/7 12/13 1
15 12 13 14 16
14.5 12 13 14 16
14 12 12 14 14
13.5 12 12 14 14
13 12 12 12 14
12.5 10 12 12 14
12 10 12 12 12
11.5 10 10 12 12
11 10 10 12 12
10.5 10 10 10 12
10 8 10 10 10
9.5 8 10 10 10
9 8 8 10 10
8.5 8 8 8 10
8 8 8 8 8
7.5 6 8 8 8
7 6 6 8 8
6.5 6 6 6 8
6 6 6 6 6
12:13 is for the 216mhz ratio, even though dfi claims it to be.... 10:11?
Bookmarks