nice memory benches. about what i found to be true as well, though i looked at 333x9 at 1:1 with it enabled and 300x10 with it disabled, about the same
Originally Posted by
Tony
Its actually good if you are using the 250 ratio as it seems to drop you down a little below the 250 but above the 233. Benching a CPU at 200 to 240fsb is usually a lot easier on the CPU but you usually lose ram speed, this may give you an option to gain some back with an added upclock ratio.
yeah, i can see that now... though inbetween 250 and 233, shouldn't it be possible to just use 233 and use a 1/2 multi lower than what was set? while this won't apply to every case, it's a possibility.
however, i just did some math.. unless the ratios aren't what they should be (5:4 and 7:6 for 250 and 233), then there is never a time when there's more than 1 between memory divider set by the two respective ratios from a range of multipliers between 6x and 15x, including the 1/2 multi's.
the difference..
disabled
Code:
4/5 6/7 12/13 1
15 12 13 14 15
14.5 12 13 14 15
14 12 12 13 14
13.5 11 12 13 14
13 11 12 12 13
12.5 10 11 12 13
12 10 11 12 12
11.5 10 10 11 12
11 9 10 11 11
10.5 9 9 10 11
10 8 9 10 10
9.5 8 9 9 10
9 8 8 9 9
8.5 7 8 8 9
8 7 7 8 8
7.5 6 7 7 8
7 6 6 7 7
6.5 6 6 6 7
6 5 6 6 6
enabled
Code:
4/5 6/7 12/13 1
15 12 13 14 16
14.5 12 13 14 16
14 12 12 14 14
13.5 12 12 14 14
13 12 12 12 14
12.5 10 12 12 14
12 10 12 12 12
11.5 10 10 12 12
11 10 10 12 12
10.5 10 10 10 12
10 8 10 10 10
9.5 8 10 10 10
9 8 8 10 10
8.5 8 8 8 10
8 8 8 8 8
7.5 6 8 8 8
7 6 6 8 8
6.5 6 6 6 8
6 6 6 6 6
12:13 is for the 216mhz ratio, even though dfi claims it to be.... 10:11?
Bookmarks