I believe Intel would rather not send free samples to AMD or any of its personnel.Originally Posted by agenda2005
I believe Intel would rather not send free samples to AMD or any of its personnel.Originally Posted by agenda2005
There might be some elements of 'truth' in that. I remember when the ScienceMark writers were alleged to have written the program to show the power of Athlon back in the days of AXP and Northwoord. They seems to have changed now, but that allegation might still hurt them.Originally Posted by incurable
That looks like a speculation at the moment.Originally Posted by StyM
When Conroe is compiled with SSE/SSE2/SSE3/SSE4 optimizations, then we shall know the real truth.
The guy have no clue that the ScienceMark benchmark was running on plane Jane x87 which does no good to current days CPUs.
SPEC score will clear up those gray areas. There are more than 20 benchmark suit in SPEC and each of them uses > 100MB of memory.
Last edited by agenda2005; 04-12-2006 at 10:17 AM.
Core 2 Duo E6600 [L625A] 3330MHz 1.375Vcore 24/7
Core 2 Duo E6600 [L640F] 3330MHz 1.475Vcore
Crucial 10th Anv 2 x 1GB DDR2-667 @ 463MHz 4-4-4-12
ASUS P5B Dlx
FOTRON BLUE STORM 500W
TT BT with stock Fan
Gigabyte Nvidia 7600GSw/ Silent Pipe
WD Cavier 250GB
Antec P160
The truth is that Tim Wilkens, the guy who programmed the apps this benchmark is based on (for his PhD research, IIRC), scored a job w/ AMD after getting his degree.Originally Posted by agenda2005
Now don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that Tim (I don't even know if he's still actively involved in the project.) or Alex or the others who are part of ScienceMark group are writing their software in a way to show one competitor scoring higher than the other. But instead of sending the ScienceMark guys pre-release hardware, Intel could just mail it to Hector himself.![]()
Bookmarks