so far i have had 3 4.97's finish fine and 1 fail.
so far i have had 3 4.97's finish fine and 1 fail.
My rig;
-amd athlon 64 3200+ @ 2.7 ghz from 2 ghz
-1024mb of pc 3200 @ 445mhz 2-2-2-0 in dual channel
-dfi lanparty ut nf4-d
-nvidia 7800 gt @ 460 mhz core and 1.2 ghz mem
-two 7200 hdd's with pagefile spread over both @ total of 2048mb
1 that could have shown the cows respect.Originally Posted by Jarrod1937
![]()
I'm trying one out, 68% no fail, but i'm shaking after 8 down.
If this one fails, i'm going to shoot those cows without any work done.
~Opinion about Dogs~~~~~~~Hug~~~~~~~~
~~~~
________________________________________________
Maybe it's a secret DPC plot to load XS team members with bad WU's...
EDIT: The last few WU's I completed were 4.97 HBLR's and they gave me the usual credit.
If you still have some 4.83 WUs to crunch then maybe setting your 'Target CPU run time' AS HIGH AS POSSIBLE would be a good idea right now - that way each good WU you have will run for 24hrs and by the time you run out they will have, hopefully, sorted out the mess...![]()
WUs have been failing constantly for the last 3 hours and I have Absolutely no idea what is going on..
Fast computers breed slow, lazy programmers
The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost simplicity. It is a price which the very rich find most hard to pay.
http://www.lighterra.com/papers/modernmicroprocessors/
Modern Ram, makes an old overclocker miss BH-5 and the fun it was
I'm not showing any problems here at all. I'm still on 4.83 with another 20-30 queued till it hit's 4.97..
Thanks for the heads up, will watch for this..
I have to add this: Don't let this hiccup get you down. The goal is to be way ahead of the DPC by the end of April. That's ALL I want to see and if I have to keep an eye on the machines over the weekend thats not so big a deal. I know if you have remote units thats impossible to do.
I guess what I'm trying to say is look at the bigger picture and don't let this get you down.
Last edited by Movieman; 04-08-2006 at 12:14 PM.
Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
The XS WCG team needs your support.
A good project with good goals.
Come join us,get that warm fuzzy feeling that you've done something good for mankind.
98% done FAILED that's nr 10
Another 4 hours work gone.
I can't find words AAAARRRRGGGGGGGHHHHHHH
Ahh that helped.
~Opinion about Dogs~~~~~~~Hug~~~~~~~~
~~~~
________________________________________________
I just started last evening and had all WU's fail!I'm going to abort all units and wait for the fix!
i5 760 @ 3.80Ghz (200x19) 1.25v | Asus P7P55D-E Pro
2x EVGA 460GTX 1G | G.Skill 8G CL9 1600 @ 1600 8-8-8-24-1 1.60v
2x WD 160G Raid 0 | Hitachi 750G | WD 1TB
Antec Quattro 850w | CNPS 10X Performa
Antec Twelve Hundred Case
Wow, sorry to hear that... super bad timing to join into the projectOriginally Posted by 426hemi
![]()
Hopefully this won't be too discouraging.
Looks like my rigs have started into 4.97. Far too many to watch, so I'll just wait for dips in output... We were on course to do about 56,000 today, too.![]()
If anyone wonder why i wrote 4 hours.
They are up on 4 hours with the 4.97, funny enough to prevent errors.
HAhahhhaaahhhahhaaahahhahahahaaha That's not funny
~Opinion about Dogs~~~~~~~Hug~~~~~~~~
~~~~
________________________________________________
You can go into your preferences and change back to 2 hours which under the circumstances might be a good idea.Originally Posted by Frisch
Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
The XS WCG team needs your support.
A good project with good goals.
Come join us,get that warm fuzzy feeling that you've done something good for mankind.
has anyone tried changing it to 8 hours or somethin higher to see if that removes the erroring? if they went to 4 to alleviate errors, going higher may actually do so.
Good idea, but i have to say that it's the last try before i wait for an update on this project.Originally Posted by Movieman
~Opinion about Dogs~~~~~~~Hug~~~~~~~~
~~~~
________________________________________________
I wouldn't dare, i mean imagine 98% on that one, and failing ouchOriginally Posted by Bloody_Sorcerer
~Opinion about Dogs~~~~~~~Hug~~~~~~~~
~~~~
________________________________________________
I'm still baffled by the incredibly bad timing of releasing a new version. Why would they do something so stupid?
A) it was before a weekend.
B) it was on a weekend that David Baker was going on a family outing.
Were they that confident in this obvious massive failure of a release? I was perfectly happy with 4.83 myself.
I'm nearly at my wit's end with this project.
Well, i have set it to 1 hour.
~Opinion about Dogs~~~~~~~Hug~~~~~~~~
~~~~
________________________________________________
I understand your frustration. Beleive me when I tell you that this pisses me off more than you can beleive. I've spent the last 3 weeks trying to bring in new members and to see this happen when the guys are coming in gets my Irish temper boiling!Originally Posted by Frisch
All I can ask is to stick with this and hopefully it will fix by Monday afternoon.
Just saw this: gpcola had a great idea! Anyone with 4.83 units left, change your preferences to 10 or more hours. That will maximise the points you get on them and make them last the weekend.![]()
Last edited by Movieman; 04-08-2006 at 12:55 PM.
Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
The XS WCG team needs your support.
A good project with good goals.
Come join us,get that warm fuzzy feeling that you've done something good for mankind.
I'm going to try to ride this problem out..
Even if I only complete ONE WU.. it is one more WU to help the group...
Fast computers breed slow, lazy programmers
The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost simplicity. It is a price which the very rich find most hard to pay.
http://www.lighterra.com/papers/modernmicroprocessors/
Modern Ram, makes an old overclocker miss BH-5 and the fun it was
I have a bottle of red wine next to me, it is nearly empty at the half time i use to drink. (maybe i have set the timer down on that one too)Originally Posted by Movieman
~Opinion about Dogs~~~~~~~Hug~~~~~~~~
~~~~
________________________________________________
The only thing that wonders me is why the heck is the new version not 4.84...
Btw in case that matters, I havent had a single wu stuck or fail on linux from what I can tell...
The next wu I am calcualting is a new one, so hopefully it works.
オタク
"Perfection is a state you should always try to attain, yet one you can never reach." - me =)
Freak, set your time down to 1 hour with the first 4.97, the failure rate is big.Originally Posted by Fr3ak
~Opinion about Dogs~~~~~~~Hug~~~~~~~~
~~~~
________________________________________________
I have read at the Rosetta site that the linux users don't appear to be having the same problem.
i5 760 @ 3.80Ghz (200x19) 1.25v | Asus P7P55D-E Pro
2x EVGA 460GTX 1G | G.Skill 8G CL9 1600 @ 1600 8-8-8-24-1 1.60v
2x WD 160G Raid 0 | Hitachi 750G | WD 1TB
Antec Quattro 850w | CNPS 10X Performa
Antec Twelve Hundred Case
I've set it to 4 hours and I am still getting a failure..Originally Posted by Frisch
Died in the last 7 minutes
![]()
Fast computers breed slow, lazy programmers
The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost simplicity. It is a price which the very rich find most hard to pay.
http://www.lighterra.com/papers/modernmicroprocessors/
Modern Ram, makes an old overclocker miss BH-5 and the fun it was
Poor youOriginally Posted by nn_step
![]()
![]()
The 4.97 are 4 hours default, set it to one, i'm almost finished with an one hour, and that's my first error free for almost a day (except 2)
PS
I died on a 98% 4 hours too. ouuuuucchhh.
~Opinion about Dogs~~~~~~~Hug~~~~~~~~
~~~~
________________________________________________
Anyone here of a fix yet?
i5 760 @ 3.80Ghz (200x19) 1.25v | Asus P7P55D-E Pro
2x EVGA 460GTX 1G | G.Skill 8G CL9 1600 @ 1600 8-8-8-24-1 1.60v
2x WD 160G Raid 0 | Hitachi 750G | WD 1TB
Antec Quattro 850w | CNPS 10X Performa
Antec Twelve Hundred Case
Bookmarks