MMM
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 62

Thread: TCCD DDR600 2.5-3-3-7 twenty four seven: The ultimate settings

  1. #1
    Bandwidth Freak
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    967

    TCCD DDR600 2.5-3-3-7 twenty four seven: The ultimate settings

    Kakaroto has done some more research for you because according to the poll I posted a short time ago in the TCCD DDR600+ guide, it seems DDR600 2.5-3-3-7 is still interesting among the people active in XS and off course the whole world of overclocking. Now 2GB is becoming mainstream for most gamers, TCCD still gives nice overclock adventures. In this guide I will discuss some of the optimization settings you can find in the BIOS. The guide will not be very huge like the previous one, but will only be focused on the BIOS settings to get your TCCD stable at DDR600 2.5-3-3-7. And stable is at least a SPI32M run and some hours of Prime.
    Some of the important terms of DQS strobe timing, drive/data strength and DRAM refresh rate (tREF) will be discussed.

    As you al know DDR600 2.5-3-3-7 is not an easy task. TCCD does not like tRP 3 at that high speed. DDR600 2.5-4-4-x and 2.5-4-3-x is more reasonable. Even though the performance difference between tRP 4 and 3 is very small, tRP at 3 looks much better. You never can tell if your memory can run DDR600 2.5-3-3-7, so you will have to test step by step and see how your memory reacts when adding some more juice.
    What I already can tell you is that what you must have is a TCCD kit which have potential to reach the ultimate DDR600 2.5-3-3-7. I had enough situations where DDR600 2.5-3-3-7 was an impossible task to do, so this guide does not guarantee you a 100% success. If your memory already craps out at 280MHz no matter what voltage and settings, is it not worth to try.

    For this guide I used a memory kit of G.Skill PC4400 1GB LE (275MHz 2.5-3-3-7) with TCCD 507 chips. This is a kit that will do at least DDR600 2.5-3-3-7, but needs to be tuned. The week code of the TCCD is quite important. The old 431/437/440 chips are better overclockers then the new 507/517/525. Sad to say, but there is one positive news and that is they love higher voltages more then the old revisions. I remember my old 431 only worked properly at 2.7v!

    The system combination you use is very important too! A crappy mainboard won’t bring you to the satisfied results. So make sure you use a descent overclock mainboard. I used a:

    - DFI NF4 Ultra-D (BIOS 623)
    - Crappy Asus 450Watts PSU (24pins) (~3,21v, 4.91v and 11,64v under load)
    - AMD Athlon 64 3000+ Venice 0517 with TTBT cooler
    - Samsung 40GB 5400rpm

    I will not use Memtest86++ because it sucks big time when tuning for a 24/7 setup, windows is what matters so programs as SuperPI32M for initial test are going to be used and for long term stability SP2004 (RAM Stress).

    STEP 1

    The memory is plugged in the orange banks for the most optimal results.

    First an initial SuperPI32M @ 275MHz 2.5-3-3-7 2.62v run with optimized settings:

    Tcl: 2.5
    Trc: 7
    Trfc: 14
    Trcd: 3
    Trrd: 2
    Tras: 7
    Trp: 3
    Twr: 2
    Twtr: 2
    Trtw: 3
    Tref: 133MHz 1.95us (4196)
    Twcl: 1

    DQS Skew mode: off
    DQS Skew: 0

    R/W Bypass: 16x
    Bypass Max: 7x
    Max. Async. Lat.: 8ns
    Read Preamble: 5ns
    Idle Cycle Limit: 0
    Drive strength: 7
    Data strength: 2

    Vddr: 2.62v




    I passed a full SPI32M run, duh its PC4400!

    STEP 2

    Let's increase the MHz a little bit to 290MHz with still the same settings:



    This gives me an instant error when trying SuperPI32M...

    STEP 3

    What I do now is increasing the voltage to 2.72v (BIOS = 2.7v +0.03v). If you want a long happy TCCD life then 2.72~2.83v is the max. So always try your memory at these voltages and see what happens.

    Tcl: 2.5
    Trc: 7
    Trfc: 14
    Trcd: 3
    Trrd: 2
    Tras: 7
    Trp: 3
    Twr: 2
    Twtr: 2
    Trtw: 3
    Tref: 133MHz 1.95us (4196)
    Twcl: 1

    DQS Skew mode: off
    DQS Skew: 0

    R/W Bypass: 16x
    Bypass Max: 7x
    Max. Async. Lat.: 8ns
    Read Preamble: 5ns
    Idle Cycle Limit: 0
    Drive strength: 7
    Data strength: 2

    Vddr: 2.72v




    As you can see, SuperPI32M is passed after upping the Vddr to 2.72v.

    If your memory is not stable try this:

    + DRAM Refresh rate to 200MHz 15.6us (3120)
    + Max. Asyn. Lat to 9ns
    + Idle Cycle Limit to 128~256
    + Drive strength 8
    + Data strength 2


    STEP 4

    If Step 3 is successfully passed, you can try setting your HTT to 300MHz 2.5-3-3-7. In the screenshot below I set the memory speed to 300MHz with ClockGen. I leaved the other settings the same. Unfortunately it failed.



    There are two things you can do now; tweak the settings or increase the Vddr.


    + The optimization settings in STEP 3


    Let's try the second option first

    STEP 5

    I increased the voltage to 2.83V in BIOS that is ~2.8v in windows. I leaved every other setting the same.

    Tcl: 2.5
    Trc: 7
    Trfc: 14
    Trcd: 3
    Trrd: 2
    Tras: 7
    Trp: 3
    Twr: 2
    Twtr: 2
    Trtw: 3
    Tref: 133MHz 1.95us (4196)
    Twcl: 1

    DQS Skew mode: off
    DQS Skew: 0

    R/W Bypass: 16x
    Bypass Max: 7x
    Max. Async. Lat.: 8ns
    Read Preamble: 5ns
    Idle Cycle Limit: 0
    Drive strength: 7
    Data strength: 2

    Vddr: 2.80v




    Unfortunately it fails again, bloody hell I give up! As you can see it's a little more stable but not enough. If your memory is stable after increasing to 2.8v, you can leave it at 2.8v or decrease it a little bit so you can tweak the settings.

    But there is more to do!

    STEP 6 - If STEP 5 is not stable

    I tried some optimization with the settings, I took some looser timings. Still I leaved the DQS strobe settings and drive/data strength untouched. I also increased the voltage with 0.03v.

    Tcl: 2.5
    Trc: 7
    Trfc: 14
    Trcd: 3
    Trrd: 2
    Tras: 7
    Trp: 3
    Twr: 2
    Twtr: 2
    Trtw: 3
    Tref: 200MHz 15.6us (3120)
    Twcl: 1

    DQS Skew mode: off
    DQS Skew: 0

    R/W Bypass: 16x
    Bypass Max: 7x
    Max. Async. Lat.: 9ns
    Read Preamble: 5ns
    Idle Cycle Limit: 256
    Drive strength: 8
    Data strength: 3

    Vddr: 2.83v




    Now SPI32M passed!! Switching banks really helped here. So much difference as you can see.


    + Switch the strongest memory module to the bank close to the memory controller


    What I find out is that if you increased the drive strength and voltage the max. async. Lat. cannot be so high. If 9ns does not work so well, try 8ns.

    Setting the Idle Cycle Limit to 256 always helps to get more stability. If you have memory is more unstable after setting to 256, leave it at 0 ~ 32.

    If your memory is still unstable try this:


    + Set DQS strobe timing to enable with value=128~255 in the BIOS. This will give you more stability but very little. Sometimes this only increases instability on some systems.
    + Try 2.86v and lower the Drive strength to 7 and data strength to 2.
    + Lower the Max. Async. Lat. ~8ns
    + If Idle Cycle limit at 256 does not work properly, set back to 16


    STEP 7 - Final testing

    Now to prove these ultimate settings work a nice SP2004 Large FTT one hour shot. Some important things about stressing with SP2004; your memory will get hot and your CPU will be 100%. I can recommend a fan or something else that generates some airflow. My SP2004 Large FTT crapped out after some time without a fan. In my previous test I didn't used a fan.
    Now with an 80mm fan aimed to the memory:



    With a better PSU I could achieve some more, but this PSU from Asus is really the bottom of all. I hoped these settings really helped on other people. I appreciate all comments, tips, results. Enjoy!

    Next guides will be DDR2 Conroe platform and AM2!
    Last edited by kakaroto; 02-16-2006 at 03:43 AM.

  2. #2
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Chile
    Posts
    322
    Nice Guide!

    i will try it right now
    L627A107

  3. #3
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    137
    I'll try it once I get my FF replacements

  4. #4
    X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Hellas-->Athens
    Posts
    1,298
    Well done....

    Sticky by me...

  5. #5
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    526
    Well.. really intersting.. my settings are close to what you have use.. only some are different,
    Tref 4708 (166,1.95) - max async + read preamble: 8 - 6..
    but for test the OC of my Opty i have like more stay at higher timings (2.5-4-4-7) for the moment.. i keep your guide in a link, and will try all of this soon.. great guides.
    Last edited by Lane-k; 02-15-2006 at 04:11 PM.

  6. #6
    Bandwidth Freak
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    967
    Quote Originally Posted by Lane-k
    Well.. really intersting.. my settings are close to what you have use.. only some are different,
    Tref 4708 (166,1.95) - max async + read preamble: 8 - 6..
    but for test the OC of my Opty i have like more stay at higher timings (2.5-4-4-7) for the moment.. i keep your guide in a link, and will try all of this soon.. great guides.
    Yes, everyone that has tested his TCCD's might have tested these settings. And again, it is very hard to find a kit that have the capability after tuning to run DDR600 2.5-3-3-7. Running 2.5-4-3-7 is easy, almost all TCCD will do that. So I guess that this will help few people with "good" TCCD, but it may bring closer to the DDR600 if not stable.

    I also have a feeling that this only applies on newer TCCD's which operate better with a higher voltage.
    Last edited by kakaroto; 02-15-2006 at 04:16 PM.

  7. #7
    Memory Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    11,651
    it is true finding TCCD to do 300mhz 2.5-3-3-x is bloody hard still haven't found a pair to do that repeatably stable in benchies best i can do for my 2x 512MB PC4400LE TCCD 431 is 295mhz 2.5-3-3-x and 300mhz 2.5-4-3-x



    and PC4800FF TCCD 516 @306-310mhz 2.5-4-3-6

    ---

  8. #8
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Chile
    Posts
    4,151
    great i'll try this on my le's

  9. #9
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    17,242
    good one....some interesting comments on relation between MAL and other settings....and DQS

    i must have worst luck with my FF sticks.....310MHz 2.5-4-3-7 1T stable and only 260-263 for 2.5-3-3-7 1T..........i've tried very hard but it's just not cooperating

    also interesting comment on the strongest perfoming stick closest to memory controller.....actually happened to me last night.....i couldn't finish even 1M at 310Mhz for some reason and after swapping sticks around 32M was OK.....big difference there


    my 440 LE sticks are only good to 280MHz 2.5-3-3-6 1T and 290MHz 2.5-4-3-7 1T so no chance there......
    Team.AU
    Got tube?
    GIGABYTE Australia
    Need a GIGABYTE bios or support?



  10. #10
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    104
    Nice guide. Going to work on my LE's right now .

  11. #11
    XS_THE_MACHINE
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Long Island
    Posts
    4,678
    Really nice guide kakaroto. I just have one question: Wouldn't putting the WEAKEST stick in the first dimm slot work better?? Somewhere on the forums, someone did a test where they tested each stick in a different dimm slot, and I think the one closest to the motherboard is the strongest, so putting the weakest mem stick in the strongest dimm slot would make up for its lack of OC?? Just a thought.
    "Victory is always possible for the person who refuses to stop fighting"

    clicks to save kids

  12. #12
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Canada, Québec
    Posts
    648
    Nice guide again Kakaroto!

    I would like that you do one another test with the TCCD please, one with a dual core, if the timmings could be the same, wich settings to use..etc!

  13. #13
    Bandwidth Freak
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    967
    Quote Originally Posted by moddolicous
    Really nice guide kakaroto. I just have one question: Wouldn't putting the WEAKEST stick in the first dimm slot work better?? Somewhere on the forums, someone did a test where they tested each stick in a different dimm slot, and I think the one closest to the motherboard is the strongest, so putting the weakest mem stick in the strongest dimm slot would make up for its lack of OC?? Just a thought.
    Thanks!
    That is what I mean, put the weakest in the first orange bank (bank2).
    And the strongest close to the CPU and that is the second orange bank (bank 4).

    Quote Originally Posted by Charloz24
    Nice guide again Kakaroto!

    I would like that you do one another test with the TCCD please, one with a dual core, if the timmings could be the same, wich settings to use..etc!
    Thanks!
    I don't have a Dual Core atm, sorry man...
    Last edited by kakaroto; 02-16-2006 at 12:28 AM.

  14. #14
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Mumbai, India
    Posts
    1,090

    Windows is Problem for Me

    Hi,
    Thanks for such a nice guide, Kakaroto. I know mine are not TCCD and question ris not related to 300 24x7 but if you can give me some pointers, I will be greatful. I have problem stabalizin' windows with my OCZ Plat 4800 (TCC5, SPD rated 303@2.5-4-4-10) @ 310 with either 8 or 9X multi.
    305 is smooth with relaxed settings 24x7
    Tcl: 2.5
    Trc: 16
    Trfc: 20
    Trcd: 3
    Trrd: 3
    Tras: 6/7
    Trp: 3
    Twr: 2
    Twtr: 2
    Trtw: 2
    Tref: 200MHz 3.95us (AUTO)
    Twcl: 1

    DQS Skew mode: off
    DQS Skew: 0
    R/W Bypass: 16x
    Bypass Max: 7x
    Max. Async. Lat.: 8ns
    Read Preamble: 5.5ns
    Idle Cycle Limit: 128
    Drive strength: 7
    Data strength: 2

    Vddr: 2.7v

    Is there a way to get it stable for windows?? I have tried with setting read Max Async Lat to 9... but no go. Even tried 2.8 but then it craps out faster then anything with SP2004-LargeFFTs. To see if it was time to try rated timings I set it but windows is still not stable.
    Thanks.
    Last edited by Harshal; 02-16-2006 at 01:27 AM.

  15. #15
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Albuquerque,NM
    Posts
    234
    swesome i will have to try this on my new le's
    DFI NF4 Ultra D/3800 x2 @ 2.5ghz/2x512 BH-5/ EVGA 7800 GT /OCZ 600W PowerStream

  16. #16
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    DK
    Posts
    1,026
    You mention some different tref settings...

    Could you tell us the corrosponding BIOS values?

    Awsome guide!

  17. #17
    Bandwidth Freak
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    967
    Quote Originally Posted by stryg
    You mention some different tref settings...

    Could you tell us the corrosponding BIOS values?

    Awsome guide!
    I updated the topic. Thanks!

  18. #18
    XS_THE_MACHINE
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Exton, PA
    Posts
    1,462
    Quote Originally Posted by moddolicous
    Really nice guide kakaroto. I just have one question: Wouldn't putting the WEAKEST stick in the first dimm slot work better?? Somewhere on the forums, someone did a test where they tested each stick in a different dimm slot, and I think the one closest to the motherboard is the strongest, so putting the weakest mem stick in the strongest dimm slot would make up for its lack of OC?? Just a thought.
    The one closest to the CPU is strongest, I have to put my weak HZ stick in there (slot 4) or I can't do 258MHz. It errors out after 2 passes of test 5 if I have the weak stick in slot 2
    Rig #1 | Opteron 165 (2898 @ 1.35v) | DFI nF4 Ultra-D | GSkill ZX 2x1GB | HIS X1900XT 512MB | Seasonic S12 550w in Antec P160

    http://www.last.fm/user/repoman0/

  19. #19
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    394
    Makes me wish I didn't go for the G.Skill HZs. Been wishing I could get 300Mhz it would be perfect for my CPU.

    What would be my best bet for 300Mhz with 2x1GB sticks?
    Last edited by foodfightr; 02-22-2006 at 01:24 AM.

  20. #20
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    394
    Quote Originally Posted by moddolicous
    Really nice guide kakaroto. I just have one question: Wouldn't putting the WEAKEST stick in the first dimm slot work better?? Somewhere on the forums, someone did a test where they tested each stick in a different dimm slot, and I think the one closest to the motherboard is the strongest, so putting the weakest mem stick in the strongest dimm slot would make up for its lack of OC?? Just a thought.
    I know this sounds weird... but my ram will OC a lot better having the stronger ram in the slot closer to the CPU.... I still don't know why but I can't argue with the results.

  21. #21
    Bandwidth Freak
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    967
    Quote Originally Posted by foodfightr
    Makes me wish I didn't go for the G.Skill HZs. Been wishing I could get 300Mhz it would be perfect for my CPU.

    What would be my best bet for 300Mhz with 2x1GB sticks?
    You can buy the TEAMGROUP PC4000 with Micron F chips or if you can find one the CRUCIAL BALLISTIX PC4000 with Micron B.

  22. #22
    Tyler Durden
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Massachusetts, USA
    Posts
    5,623
    Quote Originally Posted by kakaroto
    You can buy the TEAMGROUP PC4000 with Micron F chips or if you can find one the CRUCIAL BALLISTIX PC4000 with Micron B.
    Both of these sets use the -5B die chips, but different revisions. Ballistix in 2x1GB form use "D" revision die chips, in 2x512MB form they use "G" revision die chips. The Teamgroup use "F" revision die chips, which are the newest. Also, for reference, the OCZ EB series of DDR used to use -5B "C" die chips.
    Formerly XIP, now just P.

  23. #23
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    394
    Ballistix has been dieing often lately though and crucial is pulling them...

    I may have to search for that teamgroup ram in the U.S. and see what I can find.

  24. #24
    Bandwidth Freak
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    967
    Quote Originally Posted by EnJoY
    Both of these sets use the -5B die chips, but different revisions. Ballistix in 2x1GB form use "D" revision die chips, in 2x512MB form they use "G" revision die chips. The Teamgroup use "F" revision die chips, which are the newest. Also, for reference, the OCZ EB series of DDR used to use -5B "C" die chips.
    Thanks for your wisdom

  25. #25
    Tyler Durden
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Massachusetts, USA
    Posts
    5,623
    Quote Originally Posted by kakaroto
    Thanks for your wisdom
    Heh, I do what I can.


    Quote Originally Posted by foodfightr
    Ballistix has been dieing often lately though and crucial is pulling them...

    I may have to search for that teamgroup ram in the U.S. and see what I can find.
    Tankguys.biz has the entire line of TeamGroup memory.
    Formerly XIP, now just P.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •