From the looks of this discrepancy, I have a feeling that you'll have to get a little more specific with the details of the cpu. It's usually safe to assume that cpu's built on better wafers are binned higher. So taking that theory, I'd imagine the difference between Ben's cpu and Dumo's is roughly the difference between a CABNE Opty 146/48 and either one of Dumo's FX57's or an exceptional Opty 150+ cpu. Also, there's a HUGE difference between RUNNING @ a certain temperature vs. taking a screenshot at that temp. Try to narrow down the specifics and your results should group themselves
Originally Posted by s7e9h3n
From the looks of this discrepancy, I have a feeling that you'll have to get a little more specific with the details of the cpu. It's usually safe to assume that cpu's built on better wafers are binned higher. So taking that theory, I'd imagine the difference between Ben's cpu and Dumo's is roughly the difference between a CABNE Opty 146/48 and either one of Dumo's FX57's or an exceptional Opty 150+ cpu. Also, there's a HUGE difference between RUNNING @ a certain temperature vs. taking a screenshot at that temp. Try to narrow down the specifics and your results should group themselvesI'll leave that to someone else. I'm just trying to test your theory a little and see what we get for negative temp cpu's. give it a couple days so we have a larger look at it.
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks