would be interesting to see what X1900XTX doesOriginally Posted by perkam
would be interesting to see what X1900XTX does
---
UT has always been amd biased. Bah it sucks how the x1300p out performs the 6600gt im getting that does 11k in 03 :-/ Oh well, I dont really card, all I play is ut and css. When 07 comes out Ill go 1900methinks this benchie is just emulating how biased games released this year are going to be.example:ut2007 and to a lesser extent the latest quake4 patch.
Unapproved link in signature. Signature has been removed.
Please read the forums rules and guidelines. They are at the top of the forums.
Edited by IFMU
Probably more accurate of late 07 Unreal 3 engine based games at high detail.
Phenom II 940 BE / ASUS M4A79 / HD5770 Crossfire
3770mhz CPU 2600mhz NB | DDR1040 5-5-5-15 | 900/1250
So is it released yet???
interesting
Apparently 12pm est
Phenom II 940 BE / ASUS M4A79 / HD5770 Crossfire
3770mhz CPU 2600mhz NB | DDR1040 5-5-5-15 | 900/1250
Hm.. 6800U's whipping X800XT's because of SM3 support
One of the screenshots looks very nice
i5 750 4.20GHz @ NH-D14 | 8GB | P7P55DLE | 8800U | Indilinx SSD + Samsung F3 | HAF922 + CM750W
Past: Q6600 @ 3.60 E6400 @ 3.60 | E6300 @ 3.40 | O165 @ 2.90 | X2 4400+ @ 2.80 | X2 3800+ @ 2.70 | VE 3200+ @ 2.80 | WI 3200+ @ 2.75 | WI 3000+ no IHS @ 2.72 | TBB 1700+ @ 2.60 | XP-M 2500+ @ 2.63 | NC 2800+ @ 2.40 | AB 1.60GHz @ 2.60
i reckon thats going to change with ut2007.plus its sm3 and sm2 only so sm2.0b hardware is going to take a plunge performance wise just like what we are seeing in 3dmark06.
Last edited by RAMMAN; 01-17-2006 at 10:54 PM.
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650
Gigabyte ep45-ud3lr
Sapphire HD6970
Team Xtreem 2*1gb 1300
1TB Western Digital
hah, futuremark coders making code as efficient or representative of code done by epic? Hah
Unapproved link in signature. Signature has been removed.
Please read the forums rules and guidelines. They are at the top of the forums.
Edited by IFMU
Why would it change? Because futuremark said so? I don't see how this 1 "benchmark" is making people say intel p4's are the new good gaming cpu's
Unapproved link in signature. Signature has been removed.
Please read the forums rules and guidelines. They are at the top of the forums.
Edited by IFMU
I don't know what the problem is. I mean it seems fair to me. In that comparison that Perkam just posted the Intel platform was OCed, but the AMD one was not, so it's only fair that the Intel one has a better score.
As for the CPU, I would expect dual core to get 2x the performance because graphics is very parallisable.
Also, from EVA's chart it looks like dual core gets you a 75% boost, which is perfectly reasonable.
Last edited by DudeMiester; 01-17-2006 at 10:35 PM.
Forums are the Opiate of the Masses
no because intels involved.hence why intel cpus will mysteriously perform better in multithreaded apps starting with quake4,s latest patch
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650
Gigabyte ep45-ud3lr
Sapphire HD6970
Team Xtreem 2*1gb 1300
1TB Western Digital
6800 GT + Intel Pentium 4 3005 MHz
3DMark Score 2178 3DMarks
SM 2.0 Score 960 Marks
SM 3.0 Score 893 Marks
CPU Score 651 Marks
6800 GS + AMD Athlon(tm) 64 1800 MHz
3DMark Score 1933 3DMarks
SM 2.0 Score 807 Marks
SM 3.0 Score 766 Marks
CPU Score 705 Marks
Upon further review it looks like amd is better in 06
Unapproved link in signature. Signature has been removed.
Please read the forums rules and guidelines. They are at the top of the forums.
Edited by IFMU
Um, the quake patch is multithreaded, thus AMD X2's also got boostsno because intels involved.hence why intel cpus will mysteriously perform better in multithreaded apps starting with quake4,s latest patch
Unapproved link in signature. Signature has been removed.
Please read the forums rules and guidelines. They are at the top of the forums.
Edited by IFMU
yes but intels boosts were bigger than amd,s.something to do with sse instructions...anyway enough of this ot discussion.
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650
Gigabyte ep45-ud3lr
Sapphire HD6970
Team Xtreem 2*1gb 1300
1TB Western Digital
Link?
Also, is it just more or does 06 not seem that graphically impressive? Futuremark can suck a nut.
Unapproved link in signature. Signature has been removed.
Please read the forums rules and guidelines. They are at the top of the forums.
Edited by IFMU
One thing I think is ridiculous, the best CPU available can't even get 1 FPS in the CPU test. I mean what is this supposed to be indicating? Future performance for 2006? Try future performance for 10 years from now. This isn't telling you anything about current hardware performance. It would be one thing if this had a functional use, but now I think people are really starting to question the purpose 3DMark, especially in light of the fact that it was released so suddenly. Now it just looks like its whole purpose to is to keep hardware looking crappy.
There better be an insane amount of AI and physics (rivaling that of the PPU tech demos) for it to be performing that poorly. It's obvious the whole reason this released so fast is they didn't bother optimizing it, or making it widely compatible. Makes me wonder if holes are gonna be found later on, like 3DMark05's CPU-limit, because of the lack of testing and such.
Last edited by Cybercat; 01-17-2006 at 10:46 PM.
DFI LANParty DK 790FX-B
Phenom II X4 955 BE (1003GPMW) @ 3.8GHz (19x200) w/1.36v
-cooling: Scythe Mugen 2 + AC MX-2
XFX ATI Radeon HD 5870 1024MB
8GB PC2-6400 G.Skill @ 800MHz (1:2) 5-5-5-15 w/1.8v
Seagate 1TB 7200.11 Barracuda
Corsair HX620W
Support PC gaming. Don't pirate games.
The lighting is much better, but it looks like they didn't even touch the poly count! Maybe 10% more. Also, where's that big city thing?! That's what I want to see.
Forums are the Opiate of the Masses
qft. 06 is very dissapointing imo. This is no where near indicative of game performance. And it for sure wont be indicative of ut07
Unapproved link in signature. Signature has been removed.
Please read the forums rules and guidelines. They are at the top of the forums.
Edited by IFMU
After seeing the scores, this has to just be a ploy to sell more hardware...
We all run resolutions over 1200x1024, and none of us will even buy games that cant even get ~30fps minimum at that low of a resolution, let alone the ~14 fps our rigs will do, if this is really a good tool.
I feel sorry for you dual core Fx-60 guys. Only dual dual, or quad dual, or a serious SMP system is going to do well in this.
This is blasphemy, let's boycott futuremark until they can release a DECENT benchmark
Unapproved link in signature. Signature has been removed.
Please read the forums rules and guidelines. They are at the top of the forums.
Edited by IFMU
anyway quake4,s bias is barely noticeable compared to what will be seeing in ut2007 and what were seeing in 3dmark06.
for obvious reasons ut2007 will perform much, much better than 3dmark06 but it will be almost as biased towards nvidia/intel.
and yes the only real difference visually between 3dmark05 and 06 is because of the res and hdr
Last edited by RAMMAN; 01-17-2006 at 11:04 PM.
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650
Gigabyte ep45-ud3lr
Sapphire HD6970
Team Xtreem 2*1gb 1300
1TB Western Digital
It takes only 600$ of gfx cards to even get over 25fps in any of the tests.
1) 25fps @ 1200x1024 is too low to game on.
2) Half-Life 2 uses HDR and has playable framerates.
3) Every SM2.0 benchmark or game also gets better framerates...by about a factor of 2.
from PCPer using FX-55 , 2 x 512 MB Corsair 3200XL @ 2-2-2-5
Soon to be :
ASUS P8P67 Deluxe, Intel SB i7-2600k, G.Skill Rj-X F3-12800CL6D-4GBXH, MSI HD6950 2GB, Corsair 750AX, Intel 80GB G2 SSD, DELL U2410
Used to be: SaFrOuT
OK, I just looked at screenshots. In Return to Proxycon, they added more stationary light sources, and bloom (for brighter impact). In the Firefly Forest, all they did is add another pixie! Canyon Flight, added HDR, gave the captain a spanish face, added more junk in the background. It's like one person said in the description of the one of the tests: Yay for 3DMark05 + HDR!
But wait, what's this? Two new tests! At least we got that!
Definitely looks half-assed. No wonder they didn't call it 3DMark07. I'm surprised they're still charging to register this thing.
DFI LANParty DK 790FX-B
Phenom II X4 955 BE (1003GPMW) @ 3.8GHz (19x200) w/1.36v
-cooling: Scythe Mugen 2 + AC MX-2
XFX ATI Radeon HD 5870 1024MB
8GB PC2-6400 G.Skill @ 800MHz (1:2) 5-5-5-15 w/1.8v
Seagate 1TB 7200.11 Barracuda
Corsair HX620W
Support PC gaming. Don't pirate games.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks