NO!! You don't say!Originally Posted by aussie_guy00000
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Intel Core i7-3770K
ASUS P8Z77-I DELUXE
EVGA GTX 970 SC
Corsair 16GB (2x8GB) Vengeance LP 1600
Corsair H80
120GB Samsung 840 EVO, 500GB WD Scorpio Blue, 1TB Samsung Spinpoint F3
Corsair RM650
Cooler Master Elite 120 Advanced
OC: 5Ghz | +0.185 offset : 1.352v
heck, aussie is our guy![]()
![]()
Ryzen 9 3900X w/ NH-U14s on MSI X570 Unify
32 GB Patriot Viper Steel 3733 CL14 (1.51v)
RX 5700 XT w/ 2x 120mm fan mod (2 GHz)
Tons of NVMe & SATA SSDs
LG 27GL850 + Asus MG279Q
Meshify C white
LOL now now Tim, lets not get all sarcastic.Originally Posted by Tim
Aussie, it was announced quite a while ago that the FX-60 will be a dual core...the surprising thing is how well it clocks for a dual core proc.
Perkam
I wonder why they used at divider on the mem, when its a FX CPU....they could go x12
The whole world's hip and thats not cool !
Rip Van Hippy
Doesn't expecting the unexpected make the unexpected the expected ?
Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak
-------------------------
Heck yeah that's the spirit!Originally Posted by CrashOv3r1De
![]()
OC:Cpuz220139 Cpuz259146
#1.*DFI-VENUS*Opteron-185*XP-Pro*OCZ600SLI*2x1024KingstonHX*Audigy2zs*8800GTS@6 80/1030*|CustomChilled|
#2.*DFI-ULTRA-D*Opteron-180*Vista-Ult*GeilOne-S-2x512*OCZ600SLI*74gbRaptorx2*Audigy2zs*7900GT*Lian LiHtpc*
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Sorry mate, i'm already takenOriginally Posted by biohead
(by a chick just to clarify
)
So what are the main differences between the FX60 and an AMD X2 4800, apart from clock speed and unlocked multiplier?
Last edited by aussie_guy00000; 12-10-2005 at 06:58 PM.
I believe we saw that when the X2s came out...mem bandwith (and hence 05 score) is higher with divider + mem at cas 2 instead of 1:1 and mem at cas 2.5.Originally Posted by SIOUX
Perkam
mid-JanuaryOriginally Posted by k0nsl
The FX has better silicon. So it usually clocks better. And having better silicon is not a small thing either, while most san diego's out there get around 2.7-2.8ghz the FX57 hits around 3.2.Originally Posted by aussie_guy00000
And better memory controller.Originally Posted by Flak Monkey
BTW I thought people on XS are xtremely sexy.
damn thats impressive!
I think thats due to the better silicon but true none the less.Originally Posted by physics_geek
NOOOO! Don't cut my last line of hope.Originally Posted by freecableguy
BTW I thought people on XS are xtremely sexy.
*cough* whats the retail price again?![]()
you mean fx59 and thats the successor to the fx57 and will be 3GHz stock! Of course I hope it overclocks to like 3.5GHz on air!
3000+ Venice 240x9=2.16GHz(ondie controller limit) 2x512mb patriot tccd ram
9700pro at 325/310 runs all games buttery smooth!![]()
9700(8 pipe softmod, 128m) at 410/325 23821 at 325/310 21287 at 275/270 19159
9500(4 pipes, 128m) at 420/330 18454 at 275/270 13319
9500(8 pipe softmod, 64m) at 390/310 19201 at 275/270 16052
9500(4 pipes, 64m) at 400/310 16215 at 275/270 12560
3dmark scores with Ti4200 and Ti4800se
Ti4200 at 340/730 19558 at 300/650 18032 at 275/550 16494 at 250/500 15295
3dmark scores with older gpus
Ti500 at 275/620 14588 Ti200 at 260/540 13557 MX440 at 380/680 11551
from 8 FX60 only 3 can do 3G air stable, 4 2.9G and 1 2.8G
coolaler keeps the best one... 2nd and 3rd are in my hand now
guess, well then 77.78% of ur samples are doing 2.9ghz or better.. pretty dam good to me on air cooling. I can count the number of X2's on one hand that can do that.
today i sold my 2.9G 170 for 500 by mistake.... !!! and still ppl pm me so expensive.... i guess they don't undersatnd how hard for 2.9G +Originally Posted by MaxxxRacer
Whattt?? 500$ what happened? currency problem?
EDITED: realized it was the 2,9 170 opteron
Last edited by Always; 12-16-2005 at 07:08 AM.
So, the launch date is still Jan 10th? But I'm hoping that the inq is wrong. If it is released earlier, there is still hope for me to get it.
BTW I thought people on XS are xtremely sexy.
Bookmarks