ATI Catalyst 5.11b vs XG Warcat 5.11XT on X1800XL

[spajdr]

Ok guys, since im addicted to overclocking and benching
and since i though it could be good to try XG Warcraft 5.11XT since i heard some good stuff about it i though i could give it a try.

All tests was done with AA6x AF16x HQ

So here we go

3D Mark 2003 with GPU/MEM 500/1000 and ATI Catalyst 5.11b


3D Mark 2003 with GPU/MEM 600/1200 and ATI Catalyst 5.11b


3D Mark 2003 with GPU/MEM 500/1000 and XG Warcat 5.11XT


3D Mark 2003 with GPU/MEM 600/1200 and XG Warcat 5.11XT


so far its looking good ..

Next we got 3D Mark 2005 which sadly didnt show much difference

3D Mark 2005 with GPU/MEM 500/1000 and ATI Catalyst 5.11b


3D Mark 2005 with GPU/MEM 600/1200 and ATI Catalyst 5.11b


3D Mark 2005 with GPU/MEM 500/1000 and XG Warcat 5.11XT


3D Mark 2005 with GPU/MEM 600/1200 and XG Warcat 5.11XT


And last for now is OpenGL benchie Aquamark 3.0

500/1000 ATI Catalyst 5.11b


500/1000 XG Warcat 5.11XT


600/1200 ATI Catalyst 5.11b


600/1200 XG Warcat 5.11XT


500/1000 ATI Catalyst 5.11b in DETAILS


500/1000 XG Warcat 5.11XT in DETAILS


600/1200 ATI Catalyst 5.11b in DETAILS


600/1200 XG Warcat 5.11XT in DETAILS


Thats all folks! for now

http://www.tweaksrus.com/index.php?o...d&ascdesc=DESC
here you can get Warcats :-)

[robin]

what about games?

[spajdr]

Dont have much games now, and im tired :-)
I hope someone will try some games, for example Quake IV or FEAR, if there is some difference :-)

[deathman20]

Cool.. Might try these out.

[WarAnakin]

Thx for your testing and your time spajdr.
I hope you like the drivers .

[eva2000]

yeah looks like these will help me crack 11k in 3dmark05 for X1800XT

[ahmad]

Damn! I am gonna try these. Hopefully I can beat my record of 9400 650/1500 . I downloaded the 5.11b but haven't had a chance to play with em. Now I'll play with these instead.

Great job on the testing, and thanks.

PS. Processor? I get around 92k in aquamark with my 2.7ghz venice.

[ahmad]

This is what I get now.



My previous record was 9373 but that was with ATITool beta9. It might be ATITool 10 thats doing this. Or it could be the memory timings I messed with. In either case, its close enough.

[cantankerous]

margin of error? It is only 4 points difference.

[Magnj]

these are not ORB legal I presume