Results 1 to 25 of 85

Thread: 65nm presler 950es oc test on rad watercooling, 4.9G done !

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    292
    Quote Originally Posted by RoyaL
    big fight between Yonah and Presler/Cedar Mill

    IMO AMD is lost.
    I'll wait for benches before saying that
    E6400@3.2GHZ | P5B deluxe |8800GTS 512MB | 2*250GB Hitachi + 500GB WD|
    Aerocool masstige | Seasonic 600W |
    MX510@450HZ | 24" LG 245WP
    Cooled by: Swiftech storm - MCP 655 - Maze4/EK vodni block - Nexxos Dual Extreme

    A64 3000+@2.9ghz // XP M 2500+@2.5ghz // XP M 2600+@2.6ghz benchable at 2.9ghz superpi 35s //
    AMD opteron 146@3GHZ CABYE APMW batch 0076

  2. #2
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    USA /okla
    Posts
    2,103
    Quote Originally Posted by 187(V)URD@
    I'll wait for benches before saying that

    going off the slight improvements by these benches I don't think AMD has much to worry about.

    http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/20051010/


    Quote Originally Posted by anandtech
    Barring a miracle, the new Presler chips would need to have some new feature not listed on the roadmap to really make them outshine the existing Smithfield and Athlon 64 X2 chips. The smaller process might allow them to run slightly cooler, and we might even see 4.0GHz chips at some point, but that's about the only changes
    would be nice to see Intel get over that 4ghz hump they have been avoiding for awhile
    Last edited by iboomalot; 11-26-2005 at 06:04 PM.
    i7 6700K @4.8 ghz
    XSPC RayStorm (very nice block)
    Z170 Sabertooh ,, 32GB- Gskill (15-15-15-36 @3600 mhz) 1:1
    XFX-7970 with Swiftech Komodo nickel block
    Water Cooling - MO-RA3 Pro with 4 Silverstone 180mm @ 700 rpm, Twin Vario mcp-655 pumps
    Samsung 850-1TB SSD,, OCZ ZX-1250W (powerfull and silent)
    Crossfire 30" decent monitor for IPS too bad SED tech died

    Docsis2.0 Docsis3.0

    -- People who reject the idea that "government has a responsibility to reduce income inequality" give an average of four times more than people who accept that proposition.

  3. #3
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    L2
    Posts
    198
    Quote Originally Posted by iboomalot
    going off the slight improvements by these benches I don't think AMD has much to worry about.

    http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/20051010/
    well I think AMD is in big trouble.
    obviously with this new 0,065 chips Intel cpus will go even higher
    going over 7.5ghz@1M getting 16" or 15" who knows
    FX is stucked at 21" .. that's a shame

    Victor:put some dry ice on that baby!
    pcxtreme.it<-> ThuG Temple
    C.R.E.A.M.(Clock Rules Everything Around Me)

  4. #4
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Shanghai, P.R.China
    Posts
    1,648
    Quote Originally Posted by RoyaL
    well I think AMD is in big trouble.
    obviously with this new 0,065 chips Intel cpus will go even higher
    going over 7.5ghz@1M getting 16" or 15" who knows
    FX is stucked at 21" .. that's a shame

    Victor:put some dry ice on that baby!
    I think... 65nm single core can hit over 8.5Ghz for 1m benching
    Uni Hardware:
    http://www.unihw.com

    Team China

  5. #5
    Ebay Hater
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Denmark / UK
    Posts
    1,801
    Quote Originally Posted by VictorWang
    I think... 65nm single core can hit over 8.5Ghz for 1m benching
    If that would indeed be the case I think I better fire up them old DI containers and start saving
    In short, both AMD and NVIDIA discovered that their next-generation graphics cards are superior to each others' last-generation graphics cards.

  6. #6
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Shanghai, P.R.China
    Posts
    1,648
    Quote Originally Posted by perry_78
    If that would indeed be the case I think I better fire up them old DI containers and start saving
    I thinks LN2 is much preffered
    Uni Hardware:
    http://www.unihw.com

    Team China

  7. #7
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    1,692
    Quote Originally Posted by VictorWang
    I think... 65nm single core can hit over 8.5Ghz for 1m benching
    You might be able to get a Cedar Mill running at 8.5GHz speed (which I doubt), but Intel isn´t going to release a chipset anytime soon that can hit ~450MHz FSB with desent memory speed and timings. 975X isn´t going to bring much difference compared to 955X.

  8. #8
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Shanghai, P.R.China
    Posts
    1,648
    Quote Originally Posted by The Stilt
    You might be able to get a Cedar Mill running at 8.5GHz speed (which I doubt), but Intel isn´t going to release a chipset anytime soon that can hit ~450MHz FSB with desent memory speed and timings. 975X isn´t going to bring much difference compared to 955X.
    need you to give nb_chip some LN2 too

    I'll try what's the highest multi that 955xe can run.

    wish it can be okay at 25x
    Uni Hardware:
    http://www.unihw.com

    Team China

  9. #9
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    1,692
    Quote Originally Posted by VictorWang
    need you to give nb_chip some LN2 too

    I'll try what's the highest multi that 955xe can run.

    wish it can be okay at 25x
    Oh, your Presler has few more multipliers than I thought.
    Nice

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •