As i'm sure you've seen, Sampsa got 705mhz by just raising his XL's gpu voltage to XT levels (1.05v-->1.31v) and using the XT cooler,that seems to be of much better quality, rather than the XL one. He also achieved 705(1410) on his mem keeping the voltage stock , without even changing the voltage to XT levels. I don't know if there is still contraversy about if Sampsa's card was "special" (hand-picked) or not, but Fugger reported (iirc) 1400-1500 being very possible on his XL as well...I don't recall if he has mentioned his cooling he was using though. Hopefully it was stock.![]()
Can't wait to see more people with XL's using aftermarket air/water on their cards as soon as we have a fully-working overclocking utility and voltage adjustment software (or even hard-mods for that matter.) They may truely be worth their equal price to a GTX after all things are considered.
Yay.![]()
I still don't get why the XL's, and even XT's to an extent, were held back so much though. It seems like the XT could do more easily with just a little more stock volts...and why the XL's have such a crappy hsf and outrageously low volts is just beyond my comprehension, especially when they keep being proven to be capable of so much more so easily.
Perhaps they wanted them to be defined at these spots so when R580 products come out they can raise the stock voltage/freq so they will be positioned both above R520 for the top-end refresh, and between the XL/XT for the "XL-like" R580 product? Even if that's so...I still don't get it. When playing catch-up you'd think they'd come in with guns blazing to make up time and ground.
Bookmarks