New WR DDR636 2.5-3-3-5 1T PI 32M

[bachus_anonym]

This is what I mean, look:

300x10=3000Mhz 5-3-3-2.5-1T; I tried to set all major timmings the way you had it set for fair comparison
The result is 24:14, only 25s slower than your 320x10. At this point, every 1HTT is ~4s, so 305Mhz would beat your 320Mhz... And i would still be 150Mhz slower than you were...

This run is with 2 CPU-Z windows open, Normal Priority and no registry tweaks... Just plain, fresh OS.

http://www.clockmehigh.com/cooler/sc...4_exposure.JPG
http://www.clockmehigh.com/cooler/sc...5_exposure.JPG
http://www.clockmehigh.com/cooler/sc...6_exposure.JPG
http://www.clockmehigh.com/cooler/sc...7_exposure.JPG
http://www.clockmehigh.com/cooler/sc...8_exposure.JPG
http://www.clockmehigh.com/cooler/sc...9_exposure.JPG
http://www.clockmehigh.com/cooler/sc...0_exposure.JPG
http://www.clockmehigh.com/cooler/sc...1_exposure.JPG
http://www.clockmehigh.com/cooler/sc...2_exposure.JPG
http://www.clockmehigh.com/cooler/sc...3_exposure.JPG
http://www.clockmehigh.com/cooler/sc...4_exposure.JPG
http://www.clockmehigh.com/cooler/sc...5_exposure.JPG
http://www.clockmehigh.com/cooler/sc...6_exposure.JPG

http://www.clockmehigh.com/cooler/sc...10_633_32M.png

Just as amrgb said.... Seeing results like yours and such bad times makes me for example wonder about it


Update: Scratch that 305Mhz I said above... 303Mhz will be just fine, If run with one CPU-Z window open...