Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Bye Bye Aquamark...

  1. #1
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Bavaria,Germany
    Posts
    279

    Bye Bye Aquamark...

    http://translate.google.com/translat...lr%3D%26sa%3DG

    Massive Development will be closed...

    Bye Bye Aquamark, it was a great time with you...
    Intel P-M 730
    Asus P4GD1
    Aopen 7800GTX
    1024MB BH5

    Personal Records:
    P4@5400MHz, P-M@3,2GHz: BH5@289MHz 2225; FSB 350MHz; EB@396MHz 4228; Temp@ -189°C^^

  2. #2
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,247
    =(

    i always thought aquanox was popular on the international market...
    1. Asus P5Q-E / Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 @~3612 MHz (8,5x425) / 2x2GB OCZ Platinum XTC (PC2-8000U, CL5) / EVGA GeForce GTX 570 / Crucial M4 128GB, WD Caviar Blue 640GB, WD Caviar SE16 320GB, WD Caviar SE 160GB / be quiet! Dark Power Pro P7 550W / Thermaltake Tsunami VA3000BWA / LG L227WT / Teufel Concept E Magnum 5.1 // SysProfile


    2. Asus A8N-SLI / AMD Athlon 64 4000+ @~2640 MHz (12x220) / 1024 MB Corsair CMX TwinX 3200C2, 2.5-3-3-6 1T / Club3D GeForce 7800GT @463/1120 MHz / Crucial M4 64GB, Hitachi Deskstar 40GB / be quiet! Blackline P5 470W

  3. #3
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    793
    Awwww and I had just installed Aquamark 3.
    Quote Originally Posted by IYP
    impecible reasoning....the jedi mind skills of the stupid people are overwhelming....but they shall not assimilate me!

  4. #4
    Admin
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Posts
    12,338
    I rather hated AQ3....way too easy to cheat on and no way to detect it.

  5. #5
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    the cold place Temp: 5C
    Posts
    2,928
    I didn't like it because your score was just your FPS multiplied by 1000. That's the only reason, the score thing was just too dumb.
    For those of you about to post:

  6. #6
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Santiago, Chile
    Posts
    681
    Quote Originally Posted by craig588
    I didn't like it because your score was just your FPS multiplied by 1000. That's the only reason, the score thing was just too dumb.

    I think the same.

    I prefer Futuremark´s tools

  7. #7
    Xtreme 3D Mark Team Staff
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Juneau Alaska
    Posts
    7,607
    sad to see it go.
    one of my favorite benchmarks ever.

    it ran a mere 5203 FPS total, but it was just so damn easy to tell if a overclock was improving your score, cause the faster it ran, then better it was doing.
    I like that simplicity.
    was always one of my favorite benchmarks...




    "The command and conquer model," said the EA CEO, "doesn't work. If you think you're going to buy a developer and put your name on the label... you're making a profound mistake."

  8. #8
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Imladris
    Posts
    967
    That sucks.... I like Aquamark.... oh well time to update my sig.....
    The little air system that could.


  9. #9
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Butte MT home of the worlds largest body of contaminated water
    Posts
    514
    There goes one of my favorite quicky system benchmarks. Always loved how it just ran straight through and finished in about 2 minutes.

  10. #10
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Northern VA
    Posts
    1,556
    Quote Originally Posted by speed bump
    There goes one of my favorite quicky system benchmarks. Always loved how it just ran straight through and finished in about 2 minutes.
    yea, I loved how fast it was.

  11. #11
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    5,931
    not going to stop me from using it as a tool...

  12. #12
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    MA, USA
    Posts
    182
    ya.. massive closed down a while ago and the site was still up for months

    oh well its my favortie bench anyways..not so graphic card dependent like the 3dmark series and it shows system improvement overall and you can relate it to gaming performance more
    Coolermaster 690 | OCZ Powerstream 600 | Gigabyte P35-DS3L | E2140 @ 375x8 1.31vcore | 2x1gb G.Skill DDR2 800 | ATI X850XT PE @ 576/600
    Inspiron 9400 | T2500 | Nvidia Go7800 | 2x1gb DDR2 667 | WUXGA+ w/ Truelife

    Heatware: vtx_

  13. #13
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Brazil
    Posts
    401
    Quote Originally Posted by vtx_
    ya.. massive closed down a while ago and the site was still up for months

    oh well its my favortie bench anyways..not so graphic card dependent like the 3dmark series and it shows system improvement overall and you can relate it to gaming performance more
    I agree , i guess it is the closest to the real world performance
    E6600@3.3Ghz
    P5B-Dlx ( 0711 bios )
    BBA X1900XTX
    4x512 Corsair 5400UL


    ----------------------------------------------------
    "They couldn't hit an elephant at
    this distance" (last words of Gen.
    John Sedgwick, Spotsylvania 1864) "

    ----------------------------------------------------

  14. #14
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Tasmania, Australia
    Posts
    186
    Pity about that, but I like the speed of the benchmark and the performance comparing with overclocking.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •