http://translate.google.com/translat...lr%3D%26sa%3DG
Massive Development will be closed...
Bye Bye Aquamark, it was a great time with you...![]()
http://translate.google.com/translat...lr%3D%26sa%3DG
Massive Development will be closed...
Bye Bye Aquamark, it was a great time with you...![]()
Intel P-M 730
Asus P4GD1
Aopen 7800GTX
1024MB BH5
Personal Records:
P4@5400MHz, P-M@3,2GHz: BH5@289MHz 2225; FSB 350MHz; EB@396MHz 4228; Temp@ -189°C^^
=(
i always thought aquanox was popular on the international market...
1. Asus P5Q-E / Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 @~3612 MHz (8,5x425) / 2x2GB OCZ Platinum XTC (PC2-8000U, CL5) / EVGA GeForce GTX 570 / Crucial M4 128GB, WD Caviar Blue 640GB, WD Caviar SE16 320GB, WD Caviar SE 160GB / be quiet! Dark Power Pro P7 550W / Thermaltake Tsunami VA3000BWA / LG L227WT / Teufel Concept E Magnum 5.1 // SysProfile
2. Asus A8N-SLI / AMD Athlon 64 4000+ @~2640 MHz (12x220) / 1024 MB Corsair CMX TwinX 3200C2, 2.5-3-3-6 1T / Club3D GeForce 7800GT @463/1120 MHz / Crucial M4 64GB, Hitachi Deskstar 40GB / be quiet! Blackline P5 470W
Awwww and I had just installed Aquamark 3.
Originally Posted by IYP
I rather hated AQ3....way too easy to cheat on and no way to detect it.
I didn't like it because your score was just your FPS multiplied by 1000. That's the only reason, the score thing was just too dumb.
For those of you about to post:
Originally Posted by craig588
I think the same.
I prefer Futuremark´s tools
sad to see it go.
one of my favorite benchmarks ever.
it ran a mere 5203 FPS total, but it was just so damn easy to tell if a overclock was improving your score, cause the faster it ran, then better it was doing.
I like that simplicity.
was always one of my favorite benchmarks...
There goes one of my favorite quicky system benchmarks. Always loved how it just ran straight through and finished in about 2 minutes.
yea, I loved how fast it was.Originally Posted by speed bump
ya.. massive closed down a while ago and the site was still up for months
oh well its my favortie bench anyways..not so graphic card dependent like the 3dmark series and it shows system improvement overall and you can relate it to gaming performance more
Coolermaster 690 | OCZ Powerstream 600 | Gigabyte P35-DS3L | E2140 @ 375x8 1.31vcore | 2x1gb G.Skill DDR2 800 | ATI X850XT PE @ 576/600
Inspiron 9400 | T2500 | Nvidia Go7800 | 2x1gb DDR2 667 | WUXGA+ w/ Truelife
Heatware: vtx_
I agree , i guess it is the closest to the real world performanceOriginally Posted by vtx_
E6600@3.3Ghz
P5B-Dlx ( 0711 bios )
BBA X1900XTX
4x512 Corsair 5400UL
----------------------------------------------------
"They couldn't hit an elephant at
this distance" (last words of Gen.
John Sedgwick, Spotsylvania 1864) "
----------------------------------------------------
Pity about that, but I like the speed of the benchmark and the performance comparing with overclocking.
Bookmarks