Whats faster for SuperPI 1M Windows or Linux. I have a relic of a processor AMD Althon XP1800 (pally) and its about 7seconds quicker under Linux, compaired to windows. Is this the norm for higher end processors and computers.
My PI time was 64secs
Whats faster for SuperPI 1M Windows or Linux. I have a relic of a processor AMD Althon XP1800 (pally) and its about 7seconds quicker under Linux, compaired to windows. Is this the norm for higher end processors and computers.
My PI time was 64secs
how do you bench super PI under linux?
I think you can't compare the windows based one to a linux based one.
The linux based one uses maybe SSE2 etc. and an other way for calculating PI.
Or did you use Wine?
Opteron 144
DFI nf4
2x256MB Kingston HyperX3000 BH5
Antec TrueBlue480 w 120mm fan and modded rails
Here you can download the linux versionOriginally Posted by Flib
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...ad.php?t=36835
I'm not gonna try it out, I'm not familliar with linux and I don't like messing around with it.
Nahh I used the linux version, I dont think its that diffrent to the Windows version.
Its actually quite easy to run under linux and you dont need much knowledge to run it. I recon If I used gentoo with a good Kernel I might get even better.I'm not gonna try it out, I'm not familliar with linux and I don't like messing around with it.
Since you can't compare your scores anyway, what's the point, unless you need those digits of Pi of course...
[DFI nF4 Ultra-D @ 6/15 BIOS] // [Venice 3000+ @ 2.8GHz @ 1.472v] // [2x512MB SP BH-5 @ 2-2-2-8 200 MHz 2.63v... for the moment] // [Sapphire X800XL Ultimate] // [OCZ Powerstream 520W]
Super PI 1M record: 29.969 // Suicide screen record: 3 GHz // LBBLE 0517 DPMW batch ~300 on air // Stable enough?
TB 900 + Venice 2800 folding 24/7, TB 1200 folding whenever it's on, profile
How cant you compaire them?
I get about 10 seconds less using Linux SuperPi. In windows I get around 39 seconds for 1M, while in Linux I get 28 seconds.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks