Hey Guys,
Here is test of my rig
If I understand the GREAT KNOWLEDGE that has been shared in here.The INTEL 4c/8t 2600 is doing 5.48, this is 4 REAL cores @ 4.00 and 4 (FAKE) SMT cores @ 1.48. The real cores are probably doing more but to make it simple math, Each SMT core is doing .37% additional work as compared to a real core.
If AMD's BD can do as chew said earlier (think of it as a 4c/8t proc) 4 real cores @ 4.00 and if each of the 4 CMT cores can work at 50% or better then I think AMD does have a winner.
But back to my original thought, a PH II moved to 32nm process with some good optimizations should still have some life left in it's arch???? I think that my test shows that this arch can still compete if AMD can do a small respin on it.
Let the debate begin.
And yes I am A AMD LOVER
MaddMutt
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks