drfedja
BD will be very good if IPC per module will be 15-25% higher than 10h, frequency 15-20% with same or lower power envelope.
I agree. Llano is also better by 6-7% and those were just some minor tweaks with doubled L2 cache.
Now BD has an Integer cluster bigger by 15% than Llano and the whole module except the second integer is bigger by 60%. I think we will see a healthy increase in IPC.

Compared to previous AMD x86-64 cores, project goals reduce the number of F04 inverter delays per cycle by more than 20%, while maintaining constant IPC, to achieve higher frequency and performance in the same power envelope, even with increased core counts.
IF its true, that would be great for notebook Trinity, because honestly Llano APU for notebooks is too much limited by TDP and thats why the frequency of cpu is so low.