Hi Sin,Originally Posted by sin0822
I wouldn't worry about that post, and LLC on the UD5 should be different as it was for B2 boards.
What do you want to see? The thing is that my temps are going to be much different, and temps and power draw especially monitored by software like that is prob going to be much different machine to machine. I can measure actual power draw fromt eh 8 pin connector through some device I bought, but unless you have that too it wouldn't matter.
You are asking if LLC level1 with teh same measurement on the DMM as LLC Level2 under load will be the same?
Honestly it you are staying under 1.5v from the trends of the DMM test I did you are going to be ok, i wouldn't worry about degradation over a months or a few months period. I don't know what you want me to do exactly? I am a bit confused lol
Yea i just saw that, i guess they removed it for P67, no idea why
just got up, ok what I meant was, if you can check the temps (and power draw with realtemp) with LLC2, with the vcore value as measured by the DMM (example: 4 ghz @ 1.35v hardware measured load DMM), and compare it with the temps and power draw (with realtemp) as measured with the vcore from software with LLC1 (4 ghz @ 1.35v software measured load hwinfo32; that would probably require 1.4v BIOS For LLC1 so the software reports 1.35v at load, and 1.25v BIOS for LLC2, so the DMM reports 1.35v at load). All under small fft prime95. I know that sounds odd and crazy, but I was just curious about the results.
So basically what I meant was, i wanted to see if the software target load voltage with LLC1, matching the hardware target load voltage with LLC2, gave the same temperatures and the same power draw.
The exact reason is: I've now found two posts that are making me think something funky is going on.
The person who did the DMM tests with the UD4 board, told me that if he got (example: i dont remember the FULL details), 1.35v load, hardware measured LLC, he was stable, however if he got hardware measured 1.35v load LLC OFF (standard), he BSOD 124....
The measured hardware load voltage is exactly the same, AND LLC off requires a higher voltage set in BIOS to compensate for the droop, yet he BSOD'd only with LLC off.
I hope this makes sense....
But yeah, the power draw of the LLC1 test, and the temps, should be higher, than the LLC2, since the software report of LLC1 vcore would be the same as the hardware report of LLC2 (which is what I want), but the hardware report of LLC1 would be much higher
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks