3DMark 11 out on 30th November

[massman]

PS.: Yes people, I know that you despise me for having the brassiness to citisize your glorious hobby.

Come again when you have used more than TWO benchmarks to 'prove' 3DMark's performance measurements are inherently incorrect.

Your attitude and statements actually make Computerbase.de look like an unreliable and untrustworthy as you jump to conclusions based on very preliminary data and incorrect comparisons. First of all, you post a comparison using different resolutions and then you come with average numbers based on two benchmarks. If one of those two benchmarks are biased, your results are biased as well.

In addition, this is not about definding some kind of 'glorious hobby' but rather about the correct interpretation of numbers. For some reason, you make it sound as if those who defend the 3DMark performance measurements are taking this discussion too personal. I'm actually starting to believe the opposite is true and you're just trying to enforce your own opinion about the validity and value of a benchmark like 3DMark upon other people.