hIOmon SSD Performance Monitor - Understanding desktop usage patterns.

[Ao1]

that cannot be correct, because you are assuming that the latency is always the same here. it isnt. it changes with QD, and also with the type of access that you are doing. mixed read/write kills latency.

I only consider average latency as this was the only easy way I could compare. There are of course fluctuations on either side.

what are you talking about? look at the numbers here...how can you say that it is the same level? they arent even close!! this is from the graphic above where you posted this, if you look at the numbers....

Again I only consider average values.

you have .0239 v .0051 that is over twice as fast! also, you have 474.8354ms v 132.0012ms that is a 3x difference!
can you highlight the numbers that show where average response time for a single SSD drops to the average level of an SSD Raid 0 array?? i mean not to be incredulous or anything, but i am .

With page file on my average response time was 0.5101.ms

of course not. do the processes even max out the sequential read capability of your HDD? nope. again, not the amount, the latency is why they are faster. there are many programs that do not max out the speed of your hdd which are way faster with SSD. latency.

Before I started this I did not think my CPU being bottled neck was a problem, but now I relise that the CPU would clap out before the hard drive when pushed hard.

your thoughts on post 93? and this post? they both cover much the same info. maybe we are looking at different numbers.

I think I covered everything?

Comp, I do not try to say that raid is not faster (it clearly is ). What I try to establish is how well do I utilise my SSD based on my usage patterns. My CPU is a bit dated now (QX6850) and different results might arise with a faster set up. (hint, hint )