Let me quote you:
and you're still complaining about some "fake cores."
You said I was still complaining meaning you are lying... I haven't used that term in this thread.Period.I do not care who used it,I haven't.
Also "the many benchmark sites" are those that use mostly applications with poor MT optimizations(if at all) and games in their reviews?
How about techreport's word about 1090T and 930:
The scatter plot gives us a little more context and highlights another interesting matchup: that of the Phenom II X6 1090T versus the Core i7-930. While both processors perform roughly in the same ballpark in our test suite overall, the Intel chip requires relatively expensive X58 motherboards and triple-channel memory kits, while the AMD chip works happily in more affordable 890GX mobos (and even cheaper Socket AM3 offerings) with dual-channel RAM. The 1090T ends up looking somewhat more attractive as a result.
Lost Circuits tests can be found here.They also show Thuban performing between 930 and 940 in many tests.