MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 167

Thread: Build log: storage-oriented SR-2

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Wichita, Ks
    Posts
    3,887
    you might also try disabling search functions as well...
    however, of note here, is the server drivers for raid cards are almost always better imo. i use the 2008 R2 drivers with my 9260, all the time, everytime, even though i am running win7. you might try reinstalling win7 and using the server drivers anyway, several others with this controller also get better results this way. i wish you had a non-nf board handy so you could slap that 9260 on there and check it out. once you see the difference you would RMA that board STAT. night and day difference.
    the high IOPS you are receiving may be nice, but what of the latency of those??? that is where you are getting killed. you might try running one of Gullars profiles that we ran to compare fastpath performance, then he will compare the IOPS/AccessTime against other single card results with these controllers, giving you a frame of reference on the acccesstime performance.
    also your chipset drivers are bound to help, at least some, i would recommend you try putting those to use as well.

    These comparisone here of iops/accesstime is quite ingenious and definitely denotes the QOS within the storage system, so i believe it would be there that the issue becomes more glaring. http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=185
    Last edited by Computurd; 06-25-2010 at 05:53 PM.
    "Lurking" Since 1977


    Jesus Saves, God Backs-Up
    *I come to the news section to ban people, not read complaints.*-[XC]Gomeler
    Don't believe Squish, his hardware does control him!

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •