Quote Originally Posted by DilTech View Post
Oh, I know full well crysis isn't poorly optimized. The engine was written for future cards, but sadly the following generations never delivered like CryTek had hoped for. I mean, at the rate hardware was going when crysis was being worked on, it would've hit the point required by now if it kept at that pace, ignoring dual-gpu cards.

9800xt to x800xt around a 100% increase, an even higher gain going with NVidia from fx5950 to 6800Ultra
6800Ultra to 7800GTX, again, roughly double, x1850xt to x1900xtx(I think we can all say the x1800 was to short lived to count, so we'll skip to the x1900xtx.)
7900GTX to 8800GTX... Do I even have to mention this one? ATi didn't make nearly as big of a leap on this one.
8800GTX to 9800GTX... Was this even an upgrade? I know in some cases the 8800GTX out-performed thanks to the higher rop and memory bus.
9800GTX to GTX 280? nowhere NEAR the same leap...

Basically, if we had stayed on the same course we were on, the GTX 280/4870's would've been 2 to 4x what we saw(making the dual-cards insanely fast), which would've put crysis playable at even 1920x1080p WITH 8xAA. Sadly, now we probably won't see that for another generation, unless NVidia has a serious trump card up their sleeves, which I wouldn't be surprised if they do. Many forget, during the "road to G80" not much was said other than it would be a DX10 part. Infact, NVidia just sat silent while sites like xbit labs claimed it would be a 48 PS/24 VS card. Silence means nothing from this company.

That said, I'm not placing any bets at all on this round, but the company that wins in crysis is likely to win the whole thing. Pretty much everything else is already playable maxed out anyway on current hardware... The fact that this card loses to the GTX 295(which granted, that card IS a beast and is dual-gpus) in crysis, and barely wins in crysis war head makes me sad though, very very sad.
I agree on both points. And we should keep in mind that the final retail of Crysis was actually watered-down when it comes to graphics relative to what it was in the development process.

5870's Crysis performance is nowhere as good as I hoped for.

But there's some serious discrepancy in these charts.

Look at LP Colonies 8xAA 16xAF in 285/295 vs 5870 charts.

In 285 vs 5870 chart, 5870 looks 2.6x faster than GTX 285 in LP Colonies 8xAA 16xAF

And in 295 vs 5870 chart, 5870 looks slower than 295 (0.8x of its performance)

So if we say 5870 is 1x, then GTX 285 is 0.38x, and GTX 295 is 1.25x?

How can 295 be 3.5 times faster than 285? Isn't this some serious discrepancy?