Results 1 to 25 of 1265

Thread: AMD Shanghai/Deneb Review Thread

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    211

    Lightbulb

    Quote Originally Posted by Macadamia View Post
    C2 45nm jumped a lot in Cinebench... thanks to the caches.
    The main contributor was the Fast Radix-16 divider which speeds up its FPU operations.

    Quote Originally Posted by Macadamia View Post
    And yes, I'm suspecting what you said. That score was 32 while the Tech Report always benches in 64.

    EDIT: Still seems low. Way too low.

    http://www.techwarelabs.com/reviews/.../index_5.shtml
    http://www.sharkyextreme.com/hardwar...261_3756681__5
    Those are 32-bit ones..

    Quote Originally Posted by Macadamia View Post
    We know clock-for-clock that these Denebs are REALLY close to the Xeons in single core rendering... so wtf.
    Tech Report 2.7Ghz Opteron Cinebench x64: Single core 3156

    If we take this score, scale clock linearly to 3Ghz, times 3.9 (Phenom I speedup), we get 13676. The 32 bit scores are WAY too low.
    Nope, you can't scale them up like that. Shanghai scaling probably a bit different in CB10 and this may also apply to Deneb.

    TR shows 18616 for 8 cores. Thus speedup is (18616 / 3156 ) = 5.90

    Thus scaling per core becomes (5.90 / 8) = 73.7%

    Speedup for 4 cores is (73.7% * 4) = 2.95

    Thus per core CB10 score hypothethically is (9746 / 2.95) = 3303

    Hypothethically speaking, a 3GHz Phenom II scores 3303 per core.

    For some odd reason, Shanghai/Deneb doesn't scale well in CB10.. unlike Phenom I...
    Last edited by Ghostbuster; 12-10-2008 at 05:32 PM.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •