View Poll Results: Do you consider your intel 45nm CPU (wolfdale E8x00) to be Degraded

Voters
280. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes, after supplying 1.300v - 1.349v to the vcore

    12 4.29%
  • Yes, after supplying 1.350v - 1.399v to the vcore

    14 5.00%
  • Yes, after supplying 1.400v - 1.449v to the vcore

    26 9.29%
  • Yes, after supplying 1.450v - 1.499v to the vcore

    23 8.21%
  • Yes, after supplying 1.500v - 1.599v to the vcore

    15 5.36%
  • Yes, after supplying 1.600v or more to the vcore

    26 9.29%
  • No, and I run my vcore at 1.300v - 1.349v 24/7

    49 17.50%
  • No, and I run my vcore at 1.350v - 1.399v 24/7

    49 17.50%
  • No, and I run my vcore at 1.400v - 1.449v 24/7

    33 11.79%
  • No, and I run my vcore at 1.450v or more 24/7

    33 11.79%
Results 1 to 25 of 403

Thread: E8400/8500 degradation myth possibly busted?

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    1,377
    Quote Originally Posted by sfdmalex View Post
    Yep, you just need a rock solid system. This chip just doesnt like instabilities.

    The case might be that your Vcore graph is stable, but you check your voltages and thats spiking or dipping, even though that might not reflect in your Vcore graph it still might or will cause a crash.

    My suggestion to anyone suffering from "degradation" inspect your voltage and Vcore graphs. I bet they are nothing like this

    http://www.is-mad.com/upload/userfil...h05-Volt12.png
    http://www.is-mad.com/upload/userfil...0h05-VCore.png
    Here are my OCCT charts from today with the best stable clock 4.25ghz at 1.325vcore set in bios -

    12v

    5v

    3v

    Vcore


    Here is what I could get in Feb - same clock 4.25ghz 1.28vcore, now requires 1.325vcore with exact same settings -

    Last edited by mrcape; 04-02-2008 at 09:03 PM.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •