Results 1 to 25 of 219

Thread: Nehalem Info from hkepc

Threaded View

  1. #11
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Little Rock
    Posts
    7,204
    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    You just replace it with a higher performing CSI link to the southbridge. So no. Also the FSB itself uses very very little power.
    Wouldn't that be a DMI link to the south bridge? Intel has used DMI since at least i875/65. IIRC DMI is already a Serialized CSI like BUS/Link or whatever you like to call it. I only saw Higher end Bloomfield using CSI or Quick Path to a DT-IOH (Tylersberg), then DMI to the ICH-10 (South Bridge). That is unless PC Watch blew it and the first link here missed that too, I'll check.

    http://pc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/2.../kaigai397.htm
    Last edited by Donnie27; 01-05-2008 at 11:24 AM.
    Quote Originally Posted by Movieman
    With the two approaches to "how" to design a processor WE are the lucky ones as we get to choose what is important to us as individuals.
    For that we should thank BOTH (AMD and Intel) companies!


    Posted by duploxxx
    I am sure JF is relaxed and smiling these days with there intended launch schedule. SNB Xeon servers on the other hand....
    Posted by gallag
    there yo go bringing intel into a amd thread again lol, if that was someone droping a dig at amd you would be crying like a girl.
    qft!

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •