-
First of all, my condelances, that's more than just sad.
Without trying to be rude, wheter you're out on getting the best time or not is not the issue here, we're still talking the effect of this tweak.
I'm pointing out that if a system is starved for bandwidth, a tweak that gives a boost in data throughput for example will be executed with the handbrake on if you know what i mean.
Running 32M at 3.6GHz with 400FSB does well on a 965 chipset board (dividers are a must of course) but try this on a P35 based board and you'll be limited due to the "low" FSB speed.
Once limited on FSB, tightening the memory timings and subtimings does nothing untill one starts raising the FSB, gains wil reappear, from my own experience at least.
This is just an example and i don't know if this is relevant for the CDT tweak but i'd be rather safe than sorry.
That's why i suggested 514x7 1:1 which should be doable with 4-4-4 timings for 90% of the C2D owners around here.
Like Hipro said, some tweaks yield better results on older or other hardware, this C2D stuff might have a different way to handle system memory, sytem cache and pagefile than older stuff, hence different result outputs.
Not saying this is a fact but it's a possibilty one have to take into consideration.
Last edited by Zeus; 11-02-2007 at 03:58 AM.
Asus Crosshair V Formula-Z | FX 8350 | 2x4GB Trident-X 2600 C10 | 2x ATI HD5870 Crossfire | Enermax Revo 1050watt | OCZ Vertex 3 60GB | Samsung F1 1TB
Watercooling: XSPC Raystorm | EK 5870 Delrin fullcover | TFC X-changer 480 w/ 4x Gentle Typhoon | DDC2+ Delrin top | EK 200mm res | Primochill LRT 3/8 tubing
Case: Murdermodded TJ-07
sub 9 sec. SPi1M 940BE 955BE 965BE 1090T
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks