Official Desktop Penryn Discussion Thread

[Donnie27]

Zytek_Fan ,never mind Donnie,he does it all the time,nothing new there.Although you made a good proposition about continuing the serious discussion about Penryn,we can't have that since now the main theme is not the Penryn but it sure is Hans,Kyle and others,who no doubt about it, are all amd paid pumpers(sarcasm) and they all work against intel in some grand scheme(sarcasm).
And we have some new MPU design geniuses here(Shintai) who are ready to give some lessons to poor Hans about modern x86 processors.

Yes, you are so full of it. Nothing's stopping you from your Penryn comments either. Sure, we know it will be something negative. Again, folks in Kyle's own forums disagreed with him big time. Many were banned as well. His comments like;

But, if you look at the amount of difference between the AMD and Intel CPUs, you will see that it isn’t enough to amount to anything. The only game that we saw any real-world difference in was Oblivion, and even that was tiny. A little overclocking would clear that difference up. Overall, the performance difference isn’t enough to amount to any gameplay experience differences in these games.

LOL, a "little overclocking" is all you can get with the AMD processor used for this review. Overclock the very overclockable C2D if you like and then the blowout gets worse. Just like a bunch of misinformed folks here. You can set up Games to bottleneck the Video card and Handicap Penryn the same way. Funny Kyle didn't do this when A64 ruled the roost.

Penryn doesn't hit the market in a Void. If folks cheated for AthlonFX when Conroe clearly kicked the crap out of, if Phenom and Penryn are neck and neck, most folks already know what most Webmasters getting paid more money by AMD will say. NO, not OFF topic and very frickin' relevant.