Results 1 to 25 of 48

Thread: |[UPDATED]|E6600 + P5B Dx & 402XTREME = 4.51GHz / 564MHz FSB --> 1M/16M/32M/3D...

Threaded View

  1. #12
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    4,734
    Quote Originally Posted by afireinside
    Is that sticky insulation tape that doesn't leave a mess or just neoprene sheet? Great 32m times!
    Virginia Foam Insulation Tape - I wouldn't say it doesn't leave a mess when removed though. Somehow, it doesn't play well with liquid electrical tape... Therefore what I did, I folded it in half and glued together. I have neoprene sheets, but I think they are a bit too thick.
    Quote Originally Posted by epox4life
    You beat my E6600 32M time! The FSB and memory is to much.
    ... just by a few seconds
    Quote Originally Posted by ^don.k's^
    So, as i can see, comparing with my p5w results, 965 is too slow. With 100mhz+ on the ram( 200ddr ), and about 30mhz more on the cpu, P5W still beats P5B times. Of course ram clocks are nice indeed, but i prefer P5W all the way
    By looking at eva2000's past results and few others' around with 975x mobos, I would say P5B Dlx is clock-for-clock a bit slower but it's nothing very dramatic - around 10-15s. But I can bet you, that in many scenarios, it can still put up a fierce fight and loose it just by a hair or maybe win it... I think that P5B Dlx is more "versatile" board, that allows to clock high all C2D CPUs, not only those with 9 and higher multiplier. On the other hand, I'm pretty sure, pair up P5B Dlx with E6700 or X6800 and some of the Pi times (not all, especially past ~4.4GHz on E6700) will be as good on P5B as on P5W...
    Last edited by bachus_anonym; 09-24-2006 at 05:02 PM.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •