Even if the temps are accurate, which i still doubt because i'm seeing a real lack of consistency with the results, the temps are out of the context we're used to.

If for years, we've only seen what the thermale diode gives us, and NOT the "true core temp" and now we see the "true core temp" then it's really two different readings, and these temps aren't comparable to anything we've had before. It's hard to swallow, coming from an AMD dual core Opteron where i got 39c load with watercooling to a C2D and get 70c load on watercooling, until i think HEY maybe the Coretemp of the Opteron was like 60c.

But what makes CoreTemp more important than the diode temps we've been using for years...