Results 1 to 25 of 40

Thread: Infineon CE-5 vs Samsung UCCC - 18 benchmarks compared!!!

Threaded View

  1. #1
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    4,734

    Exclamation Infineon CE-5 vs Samsung UCCC - 18 benchmarks compared!!!

    Yo XS!

    Have you ever wondered which 2GB kit would perform better in your setup? Or how much difference there is between them? This short write-up is an attempt to give one an idea how Infineon CE-5 based 2GB set stacks up against it counterpart built with Samsung UCCC.

    I "locked" my Opteron @ 3200MHz and tested each set of memory (CE-5 and UCCC) at it's max possible frequency that particular divider allows - div183 for UCCC @ 291MHz 7-4-4-3.0-1T and div166 for CE-5 @ 267 5-2-3-3.0-1T.
    I put as much effort as I could to run each type of memory "as tight" as I could. I decided to limit my test to CAS3.0 on CE-5 as well as TRCD=4 on UCCC only. Both kits have somewhat above average OC potential.

    Tests were run one at a time, screenshots taken, then PC was rebooted and next test was performed.

    Setup:
    AMD Opteron 146 @3200MHz
    DFI LP Ultra-D R.A02, BIOS 11/14 Official
    NForce4 drivers 6.70, USB, Network and Audio enabled.
    EVGA 7800GTX 256MB KO @ 500+40/1400 (low-power mode disabled thru BIOS-mod)
    Forceware 84.21, default driver settings (Quality)
    Windows XP SP2 fresh install, not tweaked
    2GB Corsair TWINX2048-4400PRO (Infineon CE-5)
    2GB G.Skill F1-4000USU2-2GBHZ (Samsung UCCC)

    There you are, here are the results - 1st column for CE-5 and 2nd for UCCC...



    3D Benchmarks

    3DMark2001 ------> 35371 ------- 35055

    3DMark03 ---------> 19687 ------- 19679

    3DMark05 ---------> 9173 --------- 9206

    3DMark06 ---------> 4681 --------- 4711

    Aquamark3 -------> 105792 ------ 105123

    X³: Reunion ------> 77.92 --------- 78.05


    Productivity/Pi/Synthetic Benchmarks

    PCMark04 --------> 6428 ---------- 6396

    PCMark05 --------> 5098 ---------- 5054

    SuperPi 32M -----> 22:57 --------- 23:08*

    PiFast 10M -------> 37.55 --------- 37.72

    WinRAR ----------> 787 ------------ 773

    Sandra Band. ---> 7902/7814 --- 8187/8133

    Everest Lat. -----> 38.8 ----------- 38.4

    SM2.0 L1 Band. -> 36848.43 ---- 36824.17

    SM2.0 L2 Band. -> 11678.01 ---- 11609.84

    SM2.0 Mem Band. -> 7482.55 -- 7918.02


    Game Benchmarks at 1600x1200

    DOOM 3 ----------> 107.0 --------- 106.8

    FarCry ------------> 134.47 ------- 133.10

    F.E.A.R -----------> 66 ------------- 65

    Quake 4 ----------> 112.3 -------- 112.5


    Game Benchmarks at 1024x768

    DOOM 3 ----------> 125.3 --------- 124.4

    FarCry ------------> 158.57 ------- 159.87

    F.E.A.R -----------> 125 ----------- 125

    Quake 4 ----------> 153.4 -------- 153.9

    I just thought this could be of use for some. I'm gonna leave conclusions to you guys...
    Questions, comments or requests welcomed
    Last edited by bachus_anonym; 03-25-2006 at 01:07 PM.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •