Results 1 to 25 of 185

Thread: Calculating the key OC points on the 7800

Threaded View

  1. #1
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Minnesota, USA
    Posts
    302

    Calculating the key OC points on the 7800

    After some testing, the best points on the core clock of the nVidia 7800 series cards are whole multiples of the core frequency oscillation of 27 MHz. That calculates to the following root core clocks:

    (17 x 27) - 40 = 419
    (18 x 27) - 40 = 446
    (19 x 27) - 40 = 473
    (20 x 27) - 40 = 500
    (21 x 27) - 40 = 527
    (22 x 27) - 40 = 554
    (23 x 27) - 40 = 581

    And, here is how a single MHz below the whole number threshold affects 3Dmark05 scores:

    445 8052
    446 8222

    472 8404
    473 8508

    499 8669
    500 8753

    Now, what about the other two cores. How are those controlled?

    Well, when you adjust the root clock, you actually adjust all three clocks.

    The root clock gets bumped by 40 MHz to represent the real geometry or vertex core clock. So, lets pick 450 core, which so many vendors use. 486 is the best vertex clock value (18*27), which translates to 446 root (486-40). So, we would actually have 490 using a 450 root clock, a 4 Mhz pad on the required frequency.

    But, the shader and ROP cores start at 415 (really 418.5) in low power, and jump in whole frequency values (ie, 17 x 27 = 459) to a value that is less than 13.5 MHz over or equal to the root frequency. In this case the root frequency is 450 which is 18 MHz over 432 (16 x 27) and 9 MHz shy of 459 (17x 27), so 459 is the ROP/Shader clock.

    So, a little confusing, but you do have some control over the other two clocks.

    So, here is a list of primary - vertex based (red) and secondary - ROP and shader based (blue) root clock OC targets. The red will yield the larger gain, and you will see a second, albeit smaller gain on the blue clocks where the optimal memory frequency matches the root clock.

    419
    432 - the nVidia spec root clock
    446 - so many vendors use 450
    459 - why BFG uses 460
    473
    486 - why eVGA, XFX, and BFG use 490 on limited cards
    500
    513
    527
    540 - How I got 9539 on 3DMark05 with a lowly 3200+ and one 7800 GTX
    554
    567
    581
    594
    608
    621
    Last edited by HeavyH20; 09-15-2005 at 09:13 PM.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •